Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Carlson v. Smogard, 215 N.W.2d 615.

30 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent/Cross-Appellant v. Bonnie Ann Lindquist, Appellant/Cross-Respondent. 869 N.W.2d 863 Minn. 2015
State of Minnesota, Respondent/Cross-Appellant v. Bonnie Ann Lindquist, Appellant/Cross-Respondent. 869 N.W.2d 863 Minn. 2015
See, e.g., id.; Carlson v. Smogard, 298 Minn. 362, 369
Hallas v. Naegele Outdoor Advertising, Inc. 541 N.W.2d 594 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Hallas v. Naegele Outdoor Advertising, Inc. 541 N.W.2d 594 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
The Minnesota Supreme Court has stated that the Workers’ Compensation Act “was clearly intended to control only the rights between employer and employee * * Carlson v. Smogard, 298 Minn. 362
M.W. Ettinger Transfer & Leasing Co. v. Schaper Manufacturing, Inc. 494 N.W.2d 29 Minn. 1992
M.W. Ettinger Transfer & Leasing Co. v. Schaper Manufacturing, Inc. 494 N.W.2d 29 Minn. 1992
Carlson v. Smogard, 298 Minn. 362, 369
Hahn v. Tri-Line Farmers Co-Op 478 N.W.2d 515 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Hahn v. Tri-Line Farmers Co-Op 478 N.W.2d 515 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
In Carlson v. Smogard, 298 Minn. 362 , the supreme court found that Minn.Stat.
Willette v. the Mayo Foundation 458 N.W.2d 120 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Willette v. the Mayo Foundation 458 N.W.2d 120 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Carlson v. Smogard, 298 Minn. 362, 366 , Minneapolis Gas Co. v. Zimmerman, 253 Minn. 164, 173
Parson v. Holman Erection Co., Inc. 428 N.W.2d 72 Minn. 1988
Parson v. Holman Erection Co., Inc. 428 N.W.2d 72 Minn. 1988
Carlson v. Smogard, 298 Minn. 362
Shore v. Minneapolis Auto Auction, Inc. 410 N.W.2d 862 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Shore v. Minneapolis Auto Auction, Inc. 410 N.W.2d 862 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Carlson v. Smogard, 298 Minn. 362 , reaffirmed Hendrickson with regard to the exceptional situations in which indemnification applies.
Kaluza v. Home Insurance Co. 403 N.W.2d 230 Minn. 1987
Kaluza v. Home Insurance Co. 403 N.W.2d 230 Minn. 1987
See Carlson v. Smogard, 298 Minn. 362, 368
Rehnelt v. Stuebe 397 N.W.2d 563 Minn. 1986
Rehnelt v. Stuebe 397 N.W.2d 563 Minn. 1986
See Carlson v. Smogard, 298 Minn. 362, 368
Calder v. City of Crystal 318 N.W.2d 838 Minn. 1982
Calder v. City of Crystal 318 N.W.2d 838 Minn. 1982
Carlson v. Smogard, 298 Minn. 362
Tri-State Ins. Co. of Minn. v. Bouma 306 N.W.2d 564 Minn. 1981
Tri-State Ins. Co. of Minn. v. Bouma 306 N.W.2d 564 Minn. 1981
Plaintiff relies on Carlson v. Smogard, 298 Minn. 362 , in which this court held that by extinguishing a third-party tortfeasor’s common-law right of indemnity against a negligent employer without providing a reasonable substitute Minn.Stat.
Tracy v. Streater/Litton Industries 283 N.W.2d 909 Minn. 1979
Tracy v. Streater/Litton Industries 283 N.W.2d 909 Minn. 1979
See, Carlson v. Smogard, 298 Minn. 362 , Haney v. International Harvester Co., 294 Minn. 375
Hake v. Soo Line Railway Co. 258 N.W.2d 576 Minn. 1977
Hake v. Soo Line Railway Co. 258 N.W.2d 576 Minn. 1977
Carlson v. Smogard, 298 Minn. 362
Lambertson v. Cincinnati Corp. 257 N.W.2d 679 Minn. 1977
Lambertson v. Cincinnati Corp. 257 N.W.2d 679 Minn. 1977
In Carlson v. Smogard, 298 Minn. 362 , the court struck down § 176.061, subd.
Anstine v. Lake Darling Ranch, Inc. 233 N.W.2d 723 Minn. 1975
Anstine v. Lake Darling Ranch, Inc. 233 N.W.2d 723 Minn. 1975
See, Carlson v. Smogard, 298 Minn. 362