Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Har-Mar, Incorporated v. Thorsen & Thorshov, Inc., 218 N.W.2d 751.

61 citing documents.

Spira v. American Standard Insurance Co. 361 N.W.2d 454 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Har-Mar, Inc. v. Thorsen & Thorshov, Inc., 300 Minn. 149, 152-55 , -55 (1974).
Valentine v. Conticommodity SVS, Inc. 344 N.W.2d 405 Minn. 1984
Valentine v. Conticommodity SVS, Inc. 344 N.W.2d 405 Minn. 1984
See Har-Mar, Inc. v. Thorsen & Thorshov, Inc., 300 Minn. 149, 153
Brothers Jurewicz, Inc. v. Atari, Inc. 296 N.W.2d 422 Minn. 1980
Brothers Jurewicz, Inc. v. Atari, Inc. 296 N.W.2d 422 Minn. 1980
We identified this jurisdictional issue in Har-Mar, Inc. v. Thorsen & Thorshov, Inc., 300 Minn. 149, 156
In Re Arbitration Between Hennen & St. Paul Mercury Insurance 250 N.W.2d 840 Minn. 1977
In Re Arbitration Between Hennen & St. Paul Mercury Insurance 250 N.W.2d 840 Minn. 1977
See, also, Atcas v. Credit Clearing Corp. of America, 292 Minn. 334 , Har-Mar, Inc. v. Thorsen & Thorshov, Inc. 300 Minn. 149
Milwaukee Mutual Insurance v. Currier 245 N.W.2d 248 Minn. 1976
Milwaukee Mutual Insurance v. Currier 245 N.W.2d 248 Minn. 1976
In Har-Mar, Inc. v. Thorsen & Thorshov, Inc. 300 Minn. 149, 155 , we held that the statute of limitations did not preclude arbitration proceedings “solely because [the underlying] claim would be barred [by the statute of limitations] if asserted in an action in court.” Similarly, since the scope of arbitration is based upon private agreement rath
Dunshee v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 228 N.W.2d 567 Minn. 1975
Dunshee v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 228 N.W.2d 567 Minn. 1975
1(3, 5), to challenge such determination subsequent to any award.” This rule was reaffirmed in our subsequent decisions in Atcas v. Credit Clearing Corp. of America, 292 Minn. 334 , and Har-Mar, Inc. v. Thorsen & Thorshov, Inc. 300 Minn. 149