DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Prudhomme, 228 N.W.2d 243.

80 citing documents.

  • Walker v. State 394 N.W.2d 192 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
    y. In remanding for resentencing, consistent with this opinion, we note that under State v. Prudhomme, 303 Minn. 376 , the trial court is limited to the sentence originally imposed and may not “increase the penalty for any of the offenses on which it will sentence” Walker.
  • State v. Carver 390 N.W.2d 431 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Carver 390 N.W.2d 431 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
    In State v. Prudhomme, 303 Minn. 376 , the supreme court extended the rule of Holmes to a case in which multiple sentences were set aside as arising out of one behavioral incident under Minn.Stat.
  • State v. Dooley 380 N.W.2d 582 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Dooley 380 N.W.2d 582 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
    See, State v. Prudhomme, 303 Minn. 376
  • State v. Beito 332 N.W.2d 645 Minn. 1983
  • State v. Beito 332 N.W.2d 645 Minn. 1983
    In this respect, and State v. Prudhomme, 303 Minn. 376 , cases indicating that kidnapping and rape are part of a single behavioral incident where the kidnapping is committed for the purpose of facilitating the rape.
  • State v. Wallace 327 N.W.2d 85 Minn. 1982
  • State v. Wallace 327 N.W.2d 85 Minn. 1982
    State v. Prudhomme, 303 Minn. 376, 380
  • State v. Blue 327 N.W.2d 7 Minn. 1982
  • State v. Blue 327 N.W.2d 7 Minn. 1982
    State v. Prudhomme, 303 Minn. 376, 378-79 , (in one behavioral incident with three victims, three sentences could be imposed).
  • State v. Olson 291 N.W.2d 203 Minn. 1980
  • State v. Olson 291 N.W.2d 203 Minn. 1980
    State v. Prudhomme, 303 Minn. 376 , State ex rel.
  • State v. Alexander 290 N.W.2d 745 Minn. 1980
  • State v. Rieck 286 N.W.2d 724 Minn. 1979
  • State v. Rieck 286 N.W.2d 724 Minn. 1979
    Stangvik v. Tahash, 281 Minn. 353, 360 , where we stated that “the legislature did not intend in every case to immunize offenders from the consequences of separate crimes intentionally committed in a single episode against more than one individual.” See also State v. Prudhomme, 303 Minn. 376
  • Bangert v. State 282 N.W.2d 540 Minn. 1979
  • Bangert v. State 282 N.W.2d 540 Minn. 1979
    Stangvik v. Tahash, 281 Minn. 353 , see, State v. Prudhomme, 303 Minn. 376
  • State v. DeFoe 280 N.W.2d 38 Minn. 1979
  • State v. DeFoe 280 N.W.2d 38 Minn. 1979
    Stangvik v. Tahash, 281 Minn. 353, 360 , where we stated that “the legislature did not intend in every case to immunize offenders from the consequences of separate crimes intentionally committed in a single episode against more than one individual.” See, also, State v. Prudhomme, 303 Minn. 376
  • State v. Koonsman 281 N.W.2d 487 Minn. 1979
  • State v. Koonsman 281 N.W.2d 487 Minn. 1979
    See, State v. Prudhomme, 303 Minn. 376
  • State v. Hamilton 268 N.W.2d 56 Minn. 1978
  • State v. Hamilton 268 N.W.2d 56 Minn. 1978
    Stangvik v. Tahash, 281 Minn. 353 , and State v. Prudhomme, 303 Minn. 376 , to avoid this conclusion is misplaced.
  • State v. Gilbert 262 N.W.2d 334 Minn. 1977
  • State v. Gilbert 262 N.W.2d 334 Minn. 1977
    State v. Prudhomme, 303 Minn. 376 , State v. Johnson, 273 Minn. 394
  • State v. Briggs 256 N.W.2d 305 Minn. 1977
  • State v. Briggs 256 N.W.2d 305 Minn. 1977
    See, also, State v. Prudhomme, 303 Minn. 376 , (consecutive sentences, one for each victim, approved).
  • State v. Krech 252 N.W.2d 269 Minn. 1977
  • State v. Krech 252 N.W.2d 269 Minn. 1977
    4 See, e. g., State v. Prudhomme, 303 Minn. 376 , (rape, indecent liberties, and assault); State v. Shevchuk, 282 Minn. 182 , (assault, robbery, and unauthorized use of motor vehicle); State v. Murphy, 277 Minn. 355 , (drunkenness and unauthorized use of motor vehicle).