Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Sylvestre v. State, 214 N.W.2d 658.

27 citing documents.

Michelle MacDonald v. Steve Simon, Minnesota Secretary of State Minn. 2024
Michelle MacDonald v. Steve Simon, Minnesota Secretary of State Minn. 2024
12 requirement that judges be “learned in the law” was referenced, and citing Daly, it was explained that the “term means that in order to hold a judicial position a person must be admitted to practice law and in good standing.” (emphasis added).
Renee C. Kinzer v. CitiMortgage, Inc., Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, David Kinzer, Parmount Title, LLC, Kelly Potratz Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Renee C. Kinzer v. CitiMortgage, Inc., Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, David Kinzer, Parmount Title, LLC, Kelly Potratz Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Cf. Sylvester v. State, 298 Minn. 142, 157, d 6 658, 667 (1973) (“A change in the terms of the offer which reduces the terms of the original offer is, of course, tantamount to a revocation of the offer and the substitution of a new offer.” (emphasis added)).
State of Minnesota v. Jaimiah Lamar Irby 848 N.W.2d 515 Minn. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Jaimiah Lamar Irby 848 N.W.2d 515 Minn. 2014
Sylvestre v. State, 298 Minn. 142, 147 , (“The legislature may not abolish the position [of judge of the district court] nor, under the present statutes, remove a judge from office except by impeachment.”).
In Re Conduct of Ginsberg 690 N.W.2d 539 Minn. 2004
In Re Conduct of Ginsberg 690 N.W.2d 539 Minn. 2004
This preservation of the right to receive disability retirement benefits is consistent with the contractual nature of judicial retirement benefits generally that we recognized in Sylvestre v. State, 298 Minn. 142, 155 , (explaining "retirement compensation constitutes deferred payment of part of the judge’s salaiy, if he is willing to retire, which cannot be diminished during his continuance in office; and upon his retirement the contract is fully performed.
Jacobson v. Board of Trustees 627 N.W.2d 106 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Jacobson v. Board of Trustees 627 N.W.2d 106 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Bd., -52 (Minn.1983); Sylvestre v. State, 298 Minn. 142, 154-55
Page v. Carlson 488 N.W.2d 274 Minn. 1992
Page v. Carlson 488 N.W.2d 274 Minn. 1992
See Sylvestre v. State, 298 Minn. 142, 150
Feges v. Perkins Restaurants, Inc. 483 N.W.2d 701 Minn. 1992
Feges v. Perkins Restaurants, Inc. 483 N.W.2d 701 Minn. 1992
An offerer of a unilateral contract always retains the power to modify or revoke the offer so long as the offeree has not begun performance, Sylvestre v. State, 298 Minn. 142, 157 , but retention of that power does not preclude the offer from becoming a contract once accepted by the offeree by tender of performance.
Peters v. Mutual Benefit Life Insurance Co. 420 N.W.2d 908 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Peters v. Mutual Benefit Life Insurance Co. 420 N.W.2d 908 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Sylvestre v. State, 298 Minn. 142, 157
Saetre v. State 398 N.W.2d 538 Minn. 1986
Saetre v. State 398 N.W.2d 538 Minn. 1986
The increased benefits 3 would have been available to him had a claim been necessary and, more significantly, our decisions in Sylvestre v. State, 298 Minn. 142 , and Anderson v. State, 298 Minn. 158 , are dispositive.
AFSCME Council 96 v. Arrowhead Regional Corrections Board 356 N.W.2d 295 Minn. 1984
AFSCME Councils 6, 14, 65 & 96, AFL-CIO v. Sundquist 338 N.W.2d 560 Minn. 1983
AFSCME Councils 6, 14, 65 & 96, AFL-CIO v. Sundquist 338 N.W.2d 560 Minn. 1983
See, e.g., Sylvestre v. State, 298 Minn. 142, 156-57
Christensen v. Minneapolis Municipal Employees Retirement Board 331 N.W.2d 740 Minn. 1983
Christensen v. Mpls. Mun. Emp. Retire. Bd. 331 N.W.2d 740 Minn. 1983
Christensen v. Minneapolis Municipal Employees Retirement Board 331 N.W.2d 740 Minn. 1983
Paul Police Relief Ass’n, 306 Minn. 262 , Sylvestre v. State, 298 Minn. 142 , State ex rel.
Christensen v. Mpls. Mun. Emp. Retire. Bd. 331 N.W.2d 740 Minn. 1983
Paul Police Relief Ass'n, 306 Minn. 262 , Sylvestre v. State, 298 Minn. 142 , State ex rel.
Anderson v. State 214 N.W.2d 668 Minn. 1973
Anderson v. State 214 N.W.2d 668 Minn. 1973
Except as hereinafter discussed, the relief sought is governed by our decision in Sylvestre v. State, 298 Minn. 142 , filed herewith.