DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. White, 219 N.W.2d 89.

39 citing documents.

  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
    For example, in State v. White, the supreme court unequivocally stated that “the prohibition against double punishment cannot be waived.” 300 Minn. 99, 106
  • Derrick Trevor Griffin v. State of Minnesota 883 N.W.2d 282 Minn. 2016
  • Derrick Trevor Griffin v. State of Minnesota 883 N.W.2d 282 Minn. 2016
    See State v. White, 300 Minn. 99, 106, (“[T]he prohibition against double punishment cannot be waived .
  • State of Minnesota v. Troy Gary Benjamin Minn. Ct. App. 2016
  • State of Minnesota v. Troy Gary Benjamin Minn. Ct. App. 2016
    But “the prohibition against double punishment [under Minn. Stat. § 609.035] cannot be waived.” State v. White, 300 Minn. 99, 105-06
  • State v. Osborne 715 N.W.2d 436 Minn. 2006
  • State v. Osborne 715 N.W.2d 436 Minn. 2006
    State v. White, 300 Minn. 99, 105-106
  • State v. Henderson 706 N.W.2d 758 Minn. 2005
  • State v. Henderson 706 N.W.2d 758 Minn. 2005
    (allowing challenge to durational sentencing departure following revocation of stayed sentence); State v. White, 300 *760 Minn. 99, 105-06, (holding that statutory prohibition against double punishment for offenses committed in single behavioral incident cannot be waived); Minn. R.Crim.
  • State v. Allen 706 N.W.2d 40 Minn. 2005
  • State v. Allen 706 N.W.2d 40 Minn. 2005
    9 (allowing district court to correct unlawful sentence at any time); (allowing challenge to dura-tional sentencing departure following revocation of stayed sentence); State v. White, 300 Minn. 99, 105-06 , (holding that statutory prohibition against double punishment for offenses committed in single behavioral incident cannot be waived).
  • State v. Johnson 653 N.W.2d 646 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
  • State v. Johnson 653 N.W.2d 646 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
    White, 300 Minn. 99, 105-06
  • State v. Rojas 569 N.W.2d 418 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
  • State v. Rojas 569 N.W.2d 418 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
    See State v. White, 300 Minn. 99, 105 , (statutory protection against double punishment may not be waived by failure to object even when constitutional immunity from double jeopardy was waived by guilty plea).
  • State v. Hodges 384 N.W.2d 175 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Hodges 384 N.W.2d 175 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
    State v. White, 300 Minn. 99
  • State v. Erickson 367 N.W.2d 539 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Erickson 367 N.W.2d 539 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    State v. White, 300 Minn. 99, 102-03
  • State v. Olson 361 N.W.2d 899 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Olson 361 N.W.2d 899 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Howard 360 N.W.2d 637 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Howard 360 N.W.2d 637 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    State v. White, 300 Minn. 99, 102-03 , see also City of St.
  • STATE, CITY OF WOOD LAKE v. Johnson 358 N.W.2d 127 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
  • STATE, CITY OF WOOD LAKE v. Johnson 358 N.W.2d 127 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
    State v. Krech, 312 Minn. 461 , 464 n. 2, , 272 n. 2 (1977) (citing State v. White, 300 Minn. 99 , ).
  • Ture v. State 353 N.W.2d 518 Minn. 1984
  • Ture v. State 353 N.W.2d 518 Minn. 1984
    State v. White, 300 Minn. 99 , the latter ease holding that the prohibition against double punishment in section 609.035 cannot be waived.
  • State v. Zuehlke 320 N.W.2d 79 Minn. 1982
  • State v. Zuehlke 320 N.W.2d 79 Minn. 1982
    The state in this case does not claim that defense counsel failed to adequately raise the issue in a timely fashion —see State v. White, 300 Minn. 99 , —or that the prosecutor was unaware of the dual charges.
  • State v. Mendoza 297 N.W.2d 286 Minn. 1980
  • State v. Mendoza 297 N.W.2d 286 Minn. 1980
    White v. State, 309 Minn. 476 , State v. White, 300 Minn. 99
  • State v. Clement 277 N.W.2d 411 Minn. 1979
  • State v. Clement 277 N.W.2d 411 Minn. 1979
    State v. White, 300 Minn. 99
  • State v. Krech 252 N.W.2d 269 Minn. 1977
  • State v. Krech 252 N.W.2d 269 Minn. 1977
    State v. White, 300 Minn. 99
  • White v. State 248 N.W.2d 281 Minn. 1976
  • White v. State 248 N.W.2d 281 Minn. 1976
    The facts of this ease are stated in State v. White, 300 Minn. 99 , the opinion disposing of defendant’s direct appeal.
  • City of St. Paul v. DiBucci 229 N.W.2d 507 Minn. 1975
  • City of St. Paul v. DiBucci 229 N.W.2d 507 Minn. 1975