Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Dean v. Weisbrod, 217 N.W.2d 739.

25 citing documents.

Langeslag v. KYMN Inc. 664 N.W.2d 860 Minn. 2003
Langeslag v. KYMN Inc. 664 N.W.2d 860 Minn. 2003
To determine whether the district court erred in submitting Eddy’s intentional infliction of emotional distress counterclaim to the jury, “the same rule is applicable whether the question be raised by motion for a directed verdict or by motion for [JNOV].” Dean v. Weisbrod, 300 Minn. 37, 41
Louis v. Louis 636 N.W.2d 314 Minn. 2001
Louis v. Louis 636 N.W.2d 314 Minn. 2001
Dean v. Weisbrod, 300 Minn. 37, 43 , (citations omitted).
Blatz v. Allina Health System 622 N.W.2d 376 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Blatz v. Allina Health System 622 N.W.2d 376 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Dean v. Weisbrod, 300 Minn. 37, 41
Obst v. Microtron, Inc. 614 N.W.2d 196 Minn. 2000
Obst v. Microtron, Inc. 614 N.W.2d 196 Minn. 2000
Dean v. Weisbrod, 300 Minn. 37, 41-42
Pouliot v. Fitzsimmons 582 N.W.2d 221 Minn. 1998
Pouliot v. Fitzsimmons 582 N.W.2d 221 Minn. 1998
Dean v. Weisbrod, 300 Minn. 37, 41-42
Mertes v. Estate of King 501 N.W.2d 660 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Mertes v. Estate of King 501 N.W.2d 660 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Dean v. Weisbrod, 300 Minn. 37, 41
Huyen v. Driscoll 479 N.W.2d 76 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Huyen v. Driscoll 479 N.W.2d 76 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Diesen, d at 452 ; Dean v. Weisbrod, 300 Minn. 37, 42 , -43 (1974).
Diesen v. Hessburg 455 N.W.2d 446 Minn. 1990
Diesen v. Hessburg 455 N.W.2d 446 Minn. 1990
Granting JNOV is also proper when the jury’s findings are “contrary to the law applicable in the case.” Dean v. Weisbrod, 300 Minn. 37, 41-42 , -43 (1974).
Maschenik v. Park Nicollet Medical Center 385 N.W.2d 362 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Maschenik v. Park Nicollet Medical Center 385 N.W.2d 362 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
See also Dean v. Weisbrod, 300 Minn. 37, 41 , (motion for directed verdict must be governed by same rules that govern a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict).
Lane Ex Rel. Lane v. Skyline Family Medical Center 363 N.W.2d 318 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Lane Ex Rel. Lane v. Skyline Family Medical Center 363 N.W.2d 318 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
50.02; see also Dean v. Weisbrod, 300 Minn. 37, 41
American MacHine & Tool Co. v. Strite-Anderson Manufacturing Co. 353 N.W.2d 592 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
American MacHine & Tool Co. v. Strite-Anderson Manufacturing Co. 353 N.W.2d 592 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Such motions should be granted “only in those unequivocal cases where, in the light of the evidence as a whole, it would clearly be the duty of the trial court to set aside a contrary verdict as being manifestly against the entire evidence, or where it would be contrary to the law applicable to the ease.” Dean v. Weisbrod, 300 Minn. 37 , (quoting from Hanrahan).
Hage v. Stade 304 N.W.2d 283 Minn. 1981
Evanson v. Jerowski 241 N.W.2d 636 Minn. 1976
Evanson v. Jerowski 241 N.W.2d 636 Minn. 1976
Dean v. Weisbrod, 300 Minn. 37 , 2 Hetland & Adamson, Minnesota Practice, Civil Rules Ann., p. 326.