Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Cooper v. Cooper, 214 N.W.2d 682.

24 citing documents.

Marriage of Coffel v. Coffel 400 N.W.2d 371 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Coffel v. Coffel 400 N.W.2d 371 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
See Cooper v. Cooper, 298 Minn. 247, 250
Marriage of Musielewicz v. Musielewicz 400 N.W.2d 100 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Otte v. Otte 368 N.W.2d 293 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Otte v. Otte 368 N.W.2d 293 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Cooper v. Cooper, 298 Minn. 247, 250
Marriage of Peterson v. Peterson 367 N.W.2d 90 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Abuzzahab v. Abuzzahab 359 N.W.2d 12 Minn. 1984
Krick v. Krick 349 N.W.2d 350 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Krick v. Krick 349 N.W.2d 350 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Cooper v. Cooper, 298 Minn. 247
Marriage of Smoot v. Smoot 329 N.W.2d 829 Minn. 1983
Marriage of Smoot v. Smoot 329 N.W.2d 829 Minn. 1983
Cooper v. Cooper, 298 Minn. 247, 249
Marriage of Erlandson v. Erlandson 318 N.W.2d 36 Minn. 1982
Marriage of Erlandson v. Erlandson 318 N.W.2d 36 Minn. 1982
Cooper v. Cooper, 298 Minn. 247
Marriage of Otis v. Otis 299 N.W.2d 114 Minn. 1980
Amplatz v. Amplatz 289 N.W.2d 164 Minn. 1980
Amplatz v. Amplatz 289 N.W.2d 164 Minn. 1980
Cooper v. Cooper, 298 Minn. 247
Arundel v. Arundel 281 N.W.2d 663 Minn. 1979
Arundel v. Arundel 281 N.W.2d 663 Minn. 1979
See, Cooper v. Cooper, 298 Minn. 247 , Botkin v. Botkin, 247 Minn. 25
Bogen v. Bogen 261 N.W.2d 606 Minn. 1977
Bogen v. Bogen 261 N.W.2d 606 Minn. 1977
Based on less significant contributions than those of Martha Bogen, we have affirmed awards to the wife of one-half of the marital assets, Cloutier v. Cloutier, 261 Minn. 324 , and one-third of the marital assets, Krohn v. Krohn, 284 Minn. 95 , Cooper v. Cooper, 298 Minn. 247
McGough v. McGough 249 N.W.2d 885 Minn. 1977
McGough v. McGough 249 N.W.2d 885 Minn. 1977
Cooper v. Cooper, 298 Minn. 247
Felsheim v. Felsheim 214 N.W.2d 696 Minn. 1974
Felsheim v. Felsheim 214 N.W.2d 696 Minn. 1974
The law applicable to custody, property division, alimony, and support has, in addition to the statutory provisions, 1 already been expressed adequately and exhaustively in Cooper v. Cooper, 298 Minn. 247 , Ryg v. Kerkow, 296 Minn. 265 , LaBelle v. LaBelle, 296 Minn. 173 , ; Reiland v. Reiland, 290 Minn. 497 , Messer v. Messer, 289 Minn. 449 , Bollenbach v. Bollenbach, 285 Minn. 418 , d