Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Rathbun v. WT Grant Company, 219 N.W.2d 641.
- Forcier v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 310 N.W.2d 124 Minn. 1981
-
Forcier v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
310 N.W.2d 124
Minn. 1981
In Rathbun v. W. T. Grant Co., 300 Minn. 223 , we said that where potential recovery is too small to justify individual litigation, a class action is proper: “All members of the class are entitled to recover the interest charged them.
- Minnesota Education Ass'n v. Independent School District No. 495 290 N.W.2d 627 Minn. 1980
-
Minnesota Education Ass'n v. Independent School District No. 495
290 N.W.2d 627
Minn. 1980
Rathbun v. W. T. Grant Co., 300 Minn. 223
- Delgado v. Lohmar 289 N.W.2d 479 Minn. 1979
-
Delgado v. Lohmar
289 N.W.2d 479
Minn. 1979
Rathbun v. W. T. Grant Co., 300 Minn. 223
- Eakman v. Brutger 285 N.W.2d 95 Minn. 1979
-
Eakman v. Brutger
285 N.W.2d 95
Minn. 1979
Rathbun v. W. T. Grant Co., 300 Minn. 223
- Fingerhut Products Co. v. Commissioner of Revenue 258 N.W.2d 606 Minn. 1977
-
Fingerhut Products Co. v. Commissioner of Revenue
258 N.W.2d 606
Minn. 1977
See, Elwell v. County of Hennepin, 301 Minn. 63 , Rathbun v. W. T. Grant Co. 300 Minn. 223
- Bryan v. Itasca County 228 N.W.2d 249 Minn. 1975
-
Bryan v. Itasca County
228 N.W.2d 249
Minn. 1975
Rathbun v. W. T. Grant Co. 300 Minn. 223 , Tourville v. Tourville, 292 Minn. 489