Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Nygaard v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance, 221 N.W.2d 151.

57 citing documents.

Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. v. Marvin 707 N.W.2d 747 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. v. Marvin 707 N.W.2d 747 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
American National Property & Casualty Co. v. Loren 597 N.W.2d 291 Minn. 1999
American National Property & Casualty Co. v. Loren 597 N.W.2d 291 Minn. 1999
Co., 301 Minn. 10, 18-19 , ).
Norton v. Tri-State Insurance Co. of Minnesota 590 N.W.2d 649 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Norton v. Tri-State Insurance Co. of Minnesota 590 N.W.2d 649 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Ka Ying Vue v. State Farm Insurance Companies 582 N.W.2d 264 Minn. 1998
Ka Ying Vue v. State Farm Insurance Companies 582 N.W.2d 264 Minn. 1998
Co., 301 Minn. 10, 18-19
Wintz v. Colonial Ins. Co. of California 542 N.W.2d 625 Minn. 1996
Wintz v. Colonial Ins. Co. of California 542 N.W.2d 625 Minn. 1996
Co., 301 Minn. 10 , to determine the outcome of such cases.
LaFave v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 510 N.W.2d 16 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
LaFave v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 510 N.W.2d 16 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Co., 301 Minn. 10, 19 , Sobania v. Integrity Mut.
Perfetti v. Fidelity & Cas. Co. of New York 486 N.W.2d 440 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Perfetti v. Fidelity & Cas. Co. of New York 486 N.W.2d 440 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Co., 301 Minn. 10 , the supreme court addressed two consolidated cases in which children of the named insureds, while operating their own uninsured motorcycles, were injured by uninsured drivers..
Petersen v. Croft 447 N.W.2d 903 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Petersen v. Croft 447 N.W.2d 903 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Nygaard v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 301 Minn. 10, 19 , (emphasis added).
Roering v. Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Co. 444 N.W.2d 829 Minn. 1989
Vieths v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. 441 N.W.2d 575 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Vieths v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. 441 N.W.2d 575 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Citing Nygaard v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 301 Minn. 10 , the Viethses’ position is that uninsured motorist protection is not coverage for vehicles but for persons.
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Zurich Insurance Co. 439 N.W.2d 751 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Zurich Insurance Co. 439 N.W.2d 751 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
See Nygaard v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 301 Minn. 10, 18-19 , -57 (1974)
Petrich Ex Rel. Lee v. Hartford Fire Insurance Co. 427 N.W.2d 244 Minn. 1988
Petrich Ex Rel. Lee v. Hartford Fire Insurance Co. 427 N.W.2d 244 Minn. 1988
Co., 301 Minn. 10, 18-19 , -57 (1974); American Motorist Ins.
Mutual Service Casualty Insurance Co. v. VanDoren 424 N.W.2d 791 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Mutual Service Casualty Insurance Co. v. VanDoren 424 N.W.2d 791 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Petrich Ex Rel. Lee v. Hartford Fire Insurance Co. 414 N.W.2d 558 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Petrich Ex Rel. Lee v. Hartford Fire Insurance Co. 414 N.W.2d 558 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
See, Nygaard v. State Farm, 301 Minn. 10 , American Motorist Ins.
Hanson v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 417 N.W.2d 94 Minn. 1987
Hanson v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 417 N.W.2d 94 Minn. 1987
While the certified question is straightforward, the underlying question is the extent recent amendments to the No-Fault Act alter the principle, recognized in Nygaard v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 301 Minn. 10 , that uninsured motorist protection follows the person and not the vehicle.
Calvert v. Farmers Ins. Co. of Arizona 697 P.2d 684 Ariz. 1985
Calvert v. Farmers Insurance 697 P.2d 707 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
Mohs v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. 349 N.W.2d 580 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Mohs v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. 349 N.W.2d 580 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Co., 301 Minn. 10, 19 , and Northland Ins.
Doerner v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 337 N.W.2d 394 Minn. 1983
Doerner v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 337 N.W.2d 394 Minn. 1983
See Integrity Mutual Insurance Co. v. State Farm Automobile & Casualty Underwriters Insurance Co., 307 Minn. 173 , (resident relative insured); Nygaard v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 301 Minn. 10 , (resident relative insured); Pleitgen v. Farmers Insurance Exchange, 296 Minn. 191 , (named insured); Van Tassel v. Horace Mann Insurance Co., 296 Minn. 181 , (named insured).
American Motorist Insurance Co. v. Sarvela 327 N.W.2d 77 Minn. 1982
American Motorist Insurance Co. v. Sarvela 327 N.W.2d 77 Minn. 1982
See Nygaard v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 301 Minn. 10 , (court voided exclusionary clause which precluded stacking of uninsured coverage when insured injured on motorcycle); Van Tassel v. Horace Mann Insurance Co., 296 Minn. 181 , (court voided exclusionary clause in permitting stacking of uninsured benefits under the previous
Rosenberger v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 309 N.W.2d 305 Minn. 1981
Rosenberger v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 309 N.W.2d 305 Minn. 1981
This case is close to Nygaard v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 301 Minn. 10 , in which the court held that an insured, riding an uninsured motorcycle when struck by an uninsured motor vehicle, could obtain uninsured motorist benefits.
Toomey Ex Rel. Burtson v. Krone 306 N.W.2d 549 Minn. 1981
Toomey Ex Rel. Burtson v. Krone 306 N.W.2d 549 Minn. 1981
In Nygaard v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 301 Minn. 10 , we held that a similar policy exclusion was invalid with regard to uninsured motorist coverage.
Iverson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 295 N.W.2d 573 Minn. 1980
Iverson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 295 N.W.2d 573 Minn. 1980
Gudvangen v. Austin Mutual Insurance Co. 284 N.W.2d 813 Minn. 1979
Gudvangen v. Austin Mutual Insurance Co. 284 N.W.2d 813 Minn. 1979
Halseth v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 268 N.W.2d 730 Minn. 1978
Halseth v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 268 N.W.2d 730 Minn. 1978
Co., 301 Minn. 10 , Brunmeier v. Farmers Insurance Exchange, 296 Minn. 328 , In re Pleitgen v. Farmers Insurance Exchange, 296 Minn. 191 , Van Tassel v. Horace Mann Mutual Ins.
Kaysen v. Federal Insurance Co. 268 N.W.2d 920 Minn. 1978
Kaysen v. Federal Insurance Co. 268 N.W.2d 920 Minn. 1978
Co., 301 Minn. 10, 19 , and Northland Ins.
Anderson v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. 269 N.W.2d 702 Minn. 1978