Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Strouth v. Wilkison, 224 N.W.2d 511.

33 citing documents.

Lynn Peterson, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
(applying the rule that damages are limited to “actual out-of-pocket loss”).
Willow Run Partners, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
TCI Business Capital, Inc. v. Five Star American Die Casting, LLC, Brian T. Flynn 890 N.W.2d 423 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
TCI Business Capital, Inc. v. Five Star American Die Casting, LLC, Brian T. Flynn 890 N.W.2d 423 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“In Minnesota, damages for misrepresentation are limited to the actual out-of-pocket loss sustained by the plaintiff as a proximate result of the defendant’s fraud and the purchaser’s reliance thereon.” Strouth v. Wilkison, 302 Minn. 297, 300
Star Centers, Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P. 644 N.W.2d 72 Minn. 2002
Star Centers, Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P. 644 N.W.2d 72 Minn. 2002
(stating that whether misrepresentations are material in securities fraud prosecution is a question of fact); Strouth v. Wilkison, 302 Minn. 297, 299 , (stating that whether defendant misrepresented a material fact is a question of fact).
B.F. Goodrich Co. v. Mesabi Tire Co. 430 N.W.2d 180 Minn. 1988
B.F. Goodrich Co. v. Mesabi Tire Co. 430 N.W.2d 180 Minn. 1988
2d 499, 501-02 (1957); Strouth v. Wilkinson, 302 Minn. 297, 300
Anderson v. Hunter, Keith, Marshall & Co. 417 N.W.2d 619 Minn. 1988
Anderson v. Hunter, Keith, Marshall & Co. 417 N.W.2d 619 Minn. 1988
See Strouth v. Wilkison, 302 Minn. 297, 299 , -14 (1974).
Nave v. Dovolos 395 N.W.2d 393 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Nave v. Dovolos 395 N.W.2d 393 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Strouth v. Wilkison, 302 Minn. 297, 299 , -14 (1974); Witzig v. Philips, 274 Minn. 406, 410
Hughes v. Sinclair Marketing, Inc. 389 N.W.2d 194 Minn. 1986
Hughes v. Sinclair Marketing, Inc. 389 N.W.2d 194 Minn. 1986
Strouth v. Wilkison, 302 Minn. 297, 300
Delinquent Taxes of Carney v. Murray County Board of Commissioners 384 N.W.2d 920 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Delinquent Taxes of Carney v. Murray County Board of Commissioners 384 N.W.2d 920 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Moreover, in a trial without a jury, “due regard shall be given to the opportunity of the trial court to judge the credibility of the witnesses.” Strouth v. Wilkison, 302 Minn. 297, 299 , -14 (1974) (citation omitted).
Marriage of Landwehr v. Landwehr 380 N.W.2d 136 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Landwehr v. Landwehr 380 N.W.2d 136 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Strouth v. Wilkison, 302 Minn. 297, 299 , -14 (1974).
Wood v. Schlagel 375 N.W.2d 561 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Wood v. Schlagel 375 N.W.2d 561 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
“[D]ue regard shall be given to the opportunity of the trial court to judge the credibility of the witnesses.” Strouth v. Wilkison, 302 Minn. 297, 299 , -14 (1974).
Johnson Building Co. v. River Bluff Development Co. 374 N.W.2d 187 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Johnson Building Co. v. River Bluff Development Co. 374 N.W.2d 187 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
52.01; Strouth v. Wilkison, 302 Minn. 297, 299 , -14 (1974).
In Re the Welfare of R.B. 369 N.W.2d 353 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In Re the Welfare of R.B. 369 N.W.2d 353 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
See Strouth v. Wilkison, 302 Minn. 297, 299 , -14 (1974).
Lewis v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States 361 N.W.2d 875 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Doty v. Brueckner 352 N.W.2d 827 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Doty v. Brueckner 352 N.W.2d 827 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
See Strouth v. Wilkison, 302 Minn. 297, 299 , -14 (1974) (citing Davis v. Re-trac Mfg.
Barr/Nelson, Inc. v. Tonto's, Inc. 336 N.W.2d 46 Minn. 1983
Barr/Nelson, Inc. v. Tonto's, Inc. 336 N.W.2d 46 Minn. 1983
Strouth v. Wilkison, 302 Minn. 297 , Davis v. Re-trac Manufacturing Corp., 276 Minn. 116
State v. Stith 292 N.W.2d 269 Minn. 1980
State v. Stith 292 N.W.2d 269 Minn. 1980
Strouth v. Wilkison, 302 Minn. 297 , .
Lewis v. Citizens Agency of Madelia, Inc. 235 N.W.2d 831 Minn. 1975
Lewis v. Citizens Agency of Madelia, Inc. 235 N.W.2d 831 Minn. 1975
Strouth v. Wilkison, 302 Minn. 297 , Weise v. Red Owl Stores, Inc. 286 Minn. 199 , Tysk v. Griggs, 253 Minn. 86 , Lehman v. Hansord Pontiac Co. Inc. 246 Minn. 1