Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Sullivan v. F. D. Chapman Construction Co., 231 N.W.2d 87.
- Zinnel v. Berghuis Construction Co. 274 N.W.2d 495 Minn. 1979
- Cobb v. Aetna Life Insurance Co. 274 N.W.2d 911 Minn. 1979
-
Zinnel v. Berghuis Construction Co.
274 N.W.2d 495
Minn. 1979
v. F. D. Chapman Const. Co., 304 Minn. 334
-
Cobb v. Aetna Life Insurance Co.
274 N.W.2d 911
Minn. 1979
v. F. D. Chapman Const Co., 304 Minn. 334
- PMH PROPERTIES v. Nichols 263 N.W.2d 799 Minn. 1978
-
PMH PROPERTIES v. Nichols
263 N.W.2d 799
Minn. 1978
rant a motion for a directed verdict— “* * * only in those unequivocal cases where (1) in the light of the evidence as a whole, it would clearly be the duty of the trial court to set aside a contrary verdict as being manifestly against the entire evidence, or where (2) it would be contrary to the law applicable to the case.” J. N. Sullivan & Associates, Inc. v. F. D. Chapman Construction Co., 304 Minn. 334, 336
- Frey v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc. 258 N.W.2d 782 Minn. 1977
-
Frey v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc.
258 N.W.2d 782
Minn. 1977
v. F. D. Chapman Const. Co., 304 Minn. 334
- Hirman v. Rogers 257 N.W.2d 563 Minn. 1977
-
Hirman v. Rogers
257 N.W.2d 563
Minn. 1977
Usher v. Allstate Insurance Co., 300 Minn. 52 , J. N. Sullivan & Assoc, v. F. D. Chapman Const. Co., 304 Minn. 334