Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Stolp v. Scrimshaw, 220 N.W.2d 811.

42 citing documents.

Soyka v. Commissioner of Revenue 842 N.W.2d 682 Minn. 2014
State v. Williams 842 N.W.2d 308 Minn. 2014
State v. Williams 842 N.W.2d 308 Minn. 2014
This constitutional grant of appellate power is a “grant of independent power to the judiciary free from encroachment by the governor or the legislature, except only as there or elsewhere limited by the constitution.” In re O’Rourke, 300 Minn. 158, 165
Sanchez v. State 816 N.W.2d 550 Minn. 2012
Carlton v. State 816 N.W.2d 590 Minn. 2012
Carlton v. State 816 N.W.2d 590 Minn. 2012
See Spann, d at 491 (recognizing that convicted defendants do "not have a constitutional right to appeal under either the United States Constitution or the Minnesota Constitution”); cf. In re O’Rourke, 300 Minn. 158, 164 , ("We hold that the Minnesota Constitution does not, either expressly or by necessary implication, guarantee to the individual a right of appeal....”).
State v. Lessley 779 N.W.2d 825 Minn. 2010
State v. Lessley 779 N.W.2d 825 Minn. 2010
We have referred to article I of the Minnesota Constitution as a “Bill of Rights for the individual.” In re Appeal of O'Rourke, 300 Minn. 158, 165
In Re the Civil Commitment of Giem 742 N.W.2d 422 Minn. 2007
In Re the Civil Commitment of Giem 742 N.W.2d 422 Minn. 2007
This case does not involve a situation where “the legislature, in creating a substantive right by statute, may, as an element of that substantive right, circumscribe the adjudication of that right more strictly than in other cases.” In re O'Rourke, 300 Minn. 158 , 175 n. 11, , 821 n. 11 (1974); see also Carlson v. Indep.
State v. Losh 721 N.W.2d 886 Minn. 2006
State v. Losh 721 N.W.2d 886 Minn. 2006
While in the past we have recognized that “the legislature may enact reasonable regulation of the conditions under which this court’s jurisdiction shall be invoked,” In re O’Rourke, 300 Minn. 158, 163 , such regulations are recognized as a matter of comity.
Meath v. Harmful Substance Compensation Board 550 N.W.2d 275 Minn. 1996
Meath v. Harmful Substance Compensation Board 550 N.W.2d 275 Minn. 1996
While judicial review of a judicial branch decision is not constitutionally required, see Appeal of O’Rourke, 300 Minn. 158 , judicial review of an executive branch’s quasi-judicial decision is constitutionally mandated.
Arbitration Between Metropolitan Airports Commission v. Metropolitan Airports Police Federation 443 N.W.2d 519 Minn. 1989
Arbitration Between Metropolitan Airports Commission v. Metropolitan Airports Police Federation 443 N.W.2d 519 Minn. 1989
In re O’Rourke, 300 Minn. 158, 169
In Re the Occupational License of Haymes 444 N.W.2d 257 Minn. 1989
In Re the Occupational License of Haymes 444 N.W.2d 257 Minn. 1989
While judicial review of a judicial branch decision is not constitutionally required, see Appeal of O’Rourke, 300 Minn. 158 , judicial review of an executive branch’s quasi-judicial decision is constitutionally mandated.
Knudson v. Commissioner of Public Safety 438 N.W.2d 423 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Knudson v. Commissioner of Public Safety 438 N.W.2d 423 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
In re O’Rourke, 300 Minn. 158, 164
In Re State & Regents Building Asbestos Cases 435 N.W.2d 521 Minn. 1989
State v. Seifert 423 N.W.2d 368 Minn. 1988
Bahr v. City of Litchfield 404 N.W.2d 381 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Bahr v. City of Litchfield 404 N.W.2d 381 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
See In re Appeal of O’Rourke, 300 Minn. 158, 170-71 , -19 (1974) (explaining County of Brown v. Winona & St.
Ellis v. Minneapolis Commission on Civil Rights 295 N.W.2d 523 Minn. 1980
Berndt v. Berndt 292 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1980
Berndt v. Berndt 292 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1980
See In re Appeal of O’Rourke, 300 Minn. 158 , Rosenfeld v. Rosenfeld, 311 Minn. 76
State v. Welfare of M. A. P. 281 N.W.2d 334 Minn. 1979
State v. MAP 281 N.W.2d 334 Minn. 1979
State v. Welfare of M. A. P. 281 N.W.2d 334 Minn. 1979
In In re Appeal of O’Rourke, 300 Minn. 158 , while addressing the issue whether under the County Court Act, Minn.St.
State v. MAP 281 N.W.2d 334 Minn. 1979
In In re Appeal of O'Rourke, 300 Minn. 158 , while addressing the issue whether under the County Court Act, Minn.St.
State v. Wingo 266 N.W.2d 508 Minn. 1978
State v. Wingo 266 N.W.2d 508 Minn. 1978
1, which contains the following proscription: “Such rules shall not abridge, enlarge, or modify the substantive rights of any person.” The district court took its premise that the right of appeal is a substantive right from our decision in In re Appeal of O’Rourke, 300 Minn. 158, 175, note 11
Oster & Pederson, Inc. v. Commissioner of Taxation 266 N.W.2d 162 Minn. 1978
Oster & Pederson, Inc. v. Commissioner of Taxation 266 N.W.2d 162 Minn. 1978
In re Appeal of O'Rourke, 300 Minn. 158
STATE DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETY v. Ogg 246 N.W.2d 560 Minn. 1976
STATE DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETY v. Ogg 246 N.W.2d 560 Minn. 1976
12 In re Appeal of O’Rourke, 300 Minn. 158, 174
In Re Appeal of O'Rourke 246 N.W.2d 461 Minn. 1976
In Re Appeal of O'Rourke 246 N.W.2d 461 Minn. 1976
In re Appeal of O’Rourke, 300 Minn. 158, 182 , .
State v. Reps 223 N.W.2d 780 Minn. 1974
State v. Reps 223 N.W.2d 780 Minn. 1974
See, In re Appeal of O’Rourke, 300 Minn. 158
Appeal of O'Rourke 220 N.W.2d 811 Minn. 1974