Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Foesch v. Independent School District No. 646, 223 N.W.2d 371.

69 citing documents.

Liffrig v. Independent School Dist. No. 442 292 N.W.2d 726 Minn. 1980
State Ex Rel. Lucas v. BOARD OF ED., ETC. 277 N.W.2d 524 Minn. 1979
State Ex Rel. Lucas v. BOARD OF ED., ETC. 277 N.W.2d 524 Minn. 1979
Jerviss v. Independent School District No. 294 273 N.W.2d 638 Minn. 1978
Jerviss v. Independent School District No. 294 273 N.W.2d 638 Minn. 1978
No. 646, 300 Minn. 478 , ” The 1974 amendments to the teacher tenure law were directed at the problem of declining enrollments.
Mpls. Fed. of Tchrs. v. Mpls. Spec. Sch. Dist. 270 N.W.2d 773 Minn. 1978
Minneapolis Federation of Teachers, Local 59 v. Minneapolis Special School District No. 1 270 N.W.2d 773 Minn. 1978
Minneapolis Federation of Teachers, Local 59 v. Minneapolis Special School District No. 1 270 N.W.2d 773 Minn. 1978
No. 646, 300 Minn. 478 , where we remanded to the board of education to make such a determination in light of modern educational practices.
Mpls. Fed. of Tchrs. v. Mpls. Spec. Sch. Dist. 270 N.W.2d 773 Minn. 1978
No. 646, 300 Minn. 478 , where we remanded to the board of education to make such a determination in light of modern educational practices.
Independent School District No. 621 v. Public Employment Relations Board 268 N.W.2d 410 Minn. 1978
Independent School District No. 621 v. Public Employment Relations Board 268 N.W.2d 410 Minn. 1978
No. 646, 300 Minn. 478 , State ex rel.
Hudson v. Independent School District No. 77 258 N.W.2d 594 Minn. 1977
Hudson v. Independent School District No. 77 258 N.W.2d 594 Minn. 1977
Skeim v. Independent School District No. 115 234 N.W.2d 806 Minn. 1975
Skeim v. Independent School District No. 115 234 N.W.2d 806 Minn. 1975
No. 646, 300 Minn. 478 , Webster v. Marshall, 270 Minn. 292
Hendrickson v. Independent School District No. 319 228 N.W.2d 126 Minn. 1975
Hendrickson v. Independent School District No. 319 228 N.W.2d 126 Minn. 1975
No. 646, 300 Minn. 478 , insofar as it classified “position” as primary, intermediate, or grammar school divisions.
Keller v. Independent School District No. 742 224 N.W.2d 749 Minn. 1974
Keller v. Independent School District No. 742 224 N.W.2d 749 Minn. 1974
In Foesch v. Independent *329 School District No. 646, 300 Minn. 478, 485 , we stated: “A board of education, when deciding whether to hire or to terminate a teacher, is acting in an administrative capacity, and a reviewing court on appeal can set aside that decision only when the determination of the administrative agency is fraudulent, arbitrary, unreaso

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by