Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite MILBANK MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. Kluver, 225 N.W.2d 230.
- Scheibel v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. 615 N.W.2d 34 Minn. 2000
-
Scheibel v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co.
615 N.W.2d 34
Minn. 2000
Co. v. Kluver, 302 Minn. 310, 313-15 , -33 (1974)).
- Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance Co. v. Metropolitan Transit Commission 526 N.W.2d 628 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
-
Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance Co. v. Metropolitan Transit Commission
526 N.W.2d 628
Minn. Ct. App. 1995
v. Kluver, 302 Minn. 310, 313
- In re Proposed Locke Lake Project 528 N.W.2d 875 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
-
In re Proposed Locke Lake Project
528 N.W.2d 875
Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Co. v. Kluver, 302 Minn. 310, 313 , (prohibits statutory construction creating absurd result).
- Park Towers Ltd. Partnership v. County of Hennepin 498 N.W.2d 450 Minn. 1993
-
Park Towers Ltd. Partnership v. County of Hennepin
498 N.W.2d 450
Minn. 1993
Co. v. Kluver, 302 Minn. 310
- Preferred Risk Mutual Insurance Co. v. Pagel 439 N.W.2d 755 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
-
Preferred Risk Mutual Insurance Co. v. Pagel
439 N.W.2d 755
Minn. Ct. App. 1989
See Mohs v. Parrish’s Bar, Milbank Mutual Insurance Co. v. Kluver, 302 Minn. 310, 315-16 , Peters v. B.P.
- Gross v. General Casualty Insurance Co. 438 N.W.2d 378 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
-
Gross v. General Casualty Insurance Co.
438 N.W.2d 378
Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Milbank Mutual Insurance Co. v. Kluver, 302 Minn. 310, 313 , (emphasis added).
- O'DONNELL v. Brodehl 435 N.W.2d 68 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
-
O'DONNELL v. Brodehl
435 N.W.2d 68
Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Brodehl cites the case of Milbank Mutual Insurance Co. v. Kluver, 302 Minn. 310 , to argue that there *71 are no subrogation rights when the insured has not been fully compensated.
- Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. v. Wright 391 N.W.2d 519 Minn. 1986
-
Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. v. Wright
391 N.W.2d 519
Minn. 1986
at 568 , quoting Milbank Mutual Insurance Co. v. Kluver, 302 Minn. 310, 315-16
- Hedlund v. Citizens Security Mutual Insurance Co. 377 N.W.2d 460 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
-
Hedlund v. Citizens Security Mutual Insurance Co.
377 N.W.2d 460
Minn. Ct. App. 1985
See Milbank Mutual Insurance Co. v. Kluver, 302 Minn. 310
- Milbradt v. American Legion Post of Mora 354 N.W.2d 499 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
-
Milbradt v. American Legion Post of Mora
354 N.W.2d 499
Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Co. v. Kluver, 302 Minn. 310 , (interpreting pre-No Fault statute with reference to purpose of uninsured motorist insurance).
- Spaeth v. City of Plymouth 344 N.W.2d 815 Minn. 1984
-
Spaeth v. City of Plymouth
344 N.W.2d 815
Minn. 1984
Milbank Mutual Insurance Co. v. Kluver, 302 Minn. 310, 313 , Schoening v. United States Aviation Underwriters, Inc., 265 Minn. 119, 127 , Merritt v. Stuve, 215 Minn. 44, 50
- Schmidt v. Clothier 338 N.W.2d 256 Minn. 1983
- Flanery v. Total Tree, Inc. 332 N.W.2d 642 Minn. 1983
-
Flanery v. Total Tree, Inc.
332 N.W.2d 642
Minn. 1983
See Milbank Mutual Insurance Co. v. Kluver, 6 302 Minn. 310, 313-15 , -33 (1974) (right of uninsured motorist insurer to subrogation exists to extent insured will achieve a double recovery).
- Westendorf Ex Rel. Westendorf v. Stasson 330 N.W.2d 699 Minn. 1983
-
Westendorf Ex Rel. Westendorf v. Stasson
330 N.W.2d 699
Minn. 1983
Neither do we think Milbank Mutual Insurance Co. v. Kluver, 302 Minn. 310 , and Pfeffer v. State Automobile & Casualty Underwriters Insurance Co., cited by appellants, are helpful here.
- Tuenge v. Konetski 320 N.W.2d 420 Minn. 1982
-
Tuenge v. Konetski
320 N.W.2d 420
Minn. 1982
d, 564 (Minn.1982); Milbank Mutual Insurance Co. v. Kluver, 302 Minn. 310
- State Farm Insurance Companies v. Galajda 316 N.W.2d 564 Minn. 1982
-
State Farm Insurance Companies v. Galajda
316 N.W.2d 564
Minn. 1982
As this court emphasized in Milbank Mutual Insurance Co. v. Kluver, 302 Minn. 310, 315-16 , : [An] uninsured-motorist liability carrier does not have the right to be subrogated to the proceeds of a settlement its policyholder makes with liquor vendors allegedly liable under the Civil Damage Act for illegal sales to the uninsured motorist *568 where the policyholder has not
- Pfeffer v. State Automobile & Casualty Underwriters Insurance Co. 292 N.W.2d 743 Minn. 1980
-
Pfeffer v. State Automobile & Casualty Underwriters Insurance Co.
292 N.W.2d 743
Minn. 1980
The case most relied on for this argument is Milbank Mutual Insurance Co. v. Kluver, 302 Minn. 310
- Paine v. Water Works Supply Co. 269 N.W.2d 725 Minn. 1978
-
Paine v. Water Works Supply Co.
269 N.W.2d 725
Minn. 1978
Co. v. Kluver, 302 Minn. 310 , we held that an uninsured-motorist insurance carrier may not claim a credit against its insurance liability for proceeds received by the insured in a dram shop settlement with a third party where the insured had not recovered to the full extent of her losses.