Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite McCarthy v. McCarthy, 222 N.W.2d 331.

27 citing documents.

In re the Marriage of: Rebecca Ellen Bender, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
In re the Marriage of: Sharon Alice Gribble v. William Daniel Gribble Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Sharon Alice Gribble v. William Daniel Gribble Minn. Ct. App. 2015
See McCarthy v. McCarthy, 301 Minn. 270, 272, 275, (affirming spousal-maintenance award including a percentage of bonus income).
Maki v. Hansen 694 N.W.2d 78 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Maki v. Hansen 694 N.W.2d 78 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Appellant and respondent both quote discussion in McCarthy v. McCarthy, 301 Minn. 270 , as relevant in determining the timeliness of respondent’s motion.
Marriage of Krech v. Krech 624 N.W.2d 310 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Marriage of Krech v. Krech 624 N.W.2d 310 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
McCarthy v. McCarthy, 301 Minn. 270, 274
Marriage of Schultz v. Schultz 495 N.W.2d 463 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Marriage of Schultz v. Schultz 495 N.W.2d 463 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
See McCarthy v. McCarthy, 301 Minn. 270, 274
Marriage of Austin v. Austin 481 N.W.2d 884 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Marriage of Austin v. Austin 481 N.W.2d 884 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Also, were Mabel Austin the legal custodian at this time, she would have standing to bring this action under McCarthy v. McCarthy, 301 Minn. 270
Borich v. Borich 450 N.W.2d 645 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Borich v. Borich 450 N.W.2d 645 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Did the trial court have power to extend the duration of child support payments under McCarthy v. McCarthy, 301 Minn. 270 , ?
Welsh v. Welsh 446 N.W.2d 191 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Welsh v. Welsh 446 N.W.2d 191 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
McCarthy v. McCarthy, 301 Minn. 270, 274
Marriage of Anderson v. Anderson 410 N.W.2d 370 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Anderson v. Anderson 410 N.W.2d 370 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
See e.g., McCarthy v. McCarthy, 301 Minn. 270, 274 , (applying statute); Kiesow v. Kiesow, 270 Minn. 374, 385 , (applying statute).
Higgins Ex Rel. Higgins v. J.C. Penney Casualty Insurance Co. 388 N.W.2d 429 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Higgins Ex Rel. Higgins v. J.C. Penney Casualty Insurance Co. 388 N.W.2d 429 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Appellants rely on McCarthy v. McCarthy, 301 Minn. 270, 274 , a marital dissolution case in which the supreme court stated that maintenance may be extended past the date upon which children reach the age of majority if the children are physically or mentally deficient or unable to support themselves.
Marriage of Krogstad v. Krogstad 388 N.W.2d 376 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Krogstad v. Krogstad 388 N.W.2d 376 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
McCarthy v. McCarthy, 301 Minn. 270, 272
Kleinhuizen v. Kleinhuizen 354 N.W.2d 588 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Kleinhuizen v. Kleinhuizen 354 N.W.2d 588 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
See McCarthy v. McCarthy, 301 Minn. 270, 274 , Kiesow v. Kiesow, 270 Minn. 374, 385
In Re the Marriage of DuBois v. DuBois 335 N.W.2d 503 Minn. 1983
In Re the Marriage of DuBois v. DuBois 335 N.W.2d 503 Minn. 1983
McCarthy v. McCarthy, 301 Minn. 270 , Messer v. Messer, 289 Minn. 449
Sherlock v. Stillwater Clinic 260 N.W.2d 169 Minn. 1977
Sherlock v. Stillwater Clinic 260 N.W.2d 169 Minn. 1977
See, McCarthy v. McCarthy, 301 Minn. 270

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by