Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Ramsay v. Ramsay, 233 N.W.2d 729.

33 citing documents.

Marriage of Peterka v. Peterka 675 N.W.2d 353 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Marriage of Peterka v. Peterka 675 N.W.2d 353 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
303.06(d) (same); see generally Ramsay v. Ramsay, 305 Minn. 321, 323 , (reversing district court’s termination of maintenance obligation, stating, among other things, “[n]or is the fact of [obligor’s] remarriage ...
In Re Marriage of McNattin v. McNattin 450 N.W.2d 169 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
In Re Marriage of McNattin v. McNattin 450 N.W.2d 169 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Ramsay v. Ramsay, 305 Minn. 321, 323-24
Marriage of Erickson v. Erickson 435 N.W.2d 145 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Marriage of Erickson v. Erickson 435 N.W.2d 145 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
( Ramsay v. Ramsay, 305 Minn. 321, 322 , ).
Marriage of Karon v. Karon 435 N.W.2d 501 Minn. 1989
Marriage of Schroeder v. Schroeder 405 N.W.2d 267 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Schroeder v. Schroeder 405 N.W.2d 267 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
See Ramsay v. Ramsay, 305 Minn. 321, 324
Marriage of Halvorson v. Halvorson 402 N.W.2d 168 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Halvorson v. Halvorson 402 N.W.2d 168 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
See Ramsay v. Ramsay, 305 Minn. 321, 323
Marriage of James v. James 397 N.W.2d 587 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of James v. James 397 N.W.2d 587 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Ramsay v. Ramsay, 305 Minn. 321, 322
Marriage of Wildtraut v. Wildtraut 391 N.W.2d 550 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Wildtraut v. Wildtraut 391 N.W.2d 550 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
See Zieman v. Zieman, 265 Minn. 190, 192 , -80 (1963) (alimony obligation did not end following obligor’s remarriage but extenuating circumstances found); see also Ramsay v. Ramsay, 305 Minn. 321, 323 , (involving alimony only).
Marriage of O'Connor v. O'Connor 386 N.W.2d 395 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of O'Connor v. O'Connor 386 N.W.2d 395 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Ramsay v. Ramsay, 305 Minn. 321, 323-24
Moylan v. Moylan 384 N.W.2d 859 Minn. 1986
Moylan v. Moylan 384 N.W.2d 859 Minn. 1986
n marriage dissolution cases, “when a stipulation fixing the respective rights and obligations of the parties is central to the award, the trial court reviewing the original order or decree should view it as an important element because it represents the parties’ voluntary acquiescence in an equitable settlement.” see also Ramsay v. Ramsay, 305 Minn. 321, 323-24
Marriage of Sand v. Sand 379 N.W.2d 119 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Sand v. Sand 379 N.W.2d 119 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Appellant relies on Ramsay v. Ramsay, 305 Minn. 321 , to support her claim that rehabilitation or retraining is not an obligation that co-exists with permanent maintenance.
State on Behalf of Johnson v. Howell 359 N.W.2d 629 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State on Behalf of Johnson v. Howell 359 N.W.2d 629 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Ramsay v. Ramsay, 305 Minn. 321, 322
Claybaugh v. Claybaugh 312 N.W.2d 447 Minn. 1981
Claybaugh v. Claybaugh 312 N.W.2d 447 Minn. 1981
Ramsay v. Ramsay, 305 Minn. 321
Wiese v. Wiese 295 N.W.2d 371 Minn. 1980
Wiese v. Wiese 295 N.W.2d 371 Minn. 1980
Ramsay v. Ramsay, 305 Minn. 321 , Bissell v. Bissell, 291 Minn. 348 , Kaiser v. Kaiser, 290 Minn. 173
Abbott v. Abbott 282 N.W.2d 561 Minn. 1979
Abbott v. Abbott 282 N.W.2d 561 Minn. 1979
Ramsay v. Ramsay, 305 Minn. 321
Epstein v. Epstein 268 N.W.2d 50 Minn. 1978
Epstein v. Epstein 268 N.W.2d 50 Minn. 1978
Ramsay v. Ramsay, 305 Minn. 321 , Kaiser v. Kaiser, 290 Minn. 173
Sieber v. Sieber 258 N.W.2d 754 Minn. 1977
Sieber v. Sieber 258 N.W.2d 754 Minn. 1977
See, Ramsay v. Ramsay, 305 Minn. 321 , Rubenstein v. Rubenstein, 295 Minn. 29 , 6A Dunnell, Dig.