Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Bergstedt, Wahlberg, Berquist Associates, Inc. v. Rothchild, 225 N.W.2d 261.

56 citing documents.

Michael Fosness, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Bergstedt, Wahlberg, Berquist Assocs.
Oehlerts & Sons Construction, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
v. Rothchild, (“[N]o legal distinction can be made in the effect of a promise whether it is expressed in writing, orally, in the acts of the parties, or in a combination of means.”).3 Perhaps the more important question is on what theory the company tried the case to the district court.
Leslie E. Sheehy Lee v. Travis W. Kalis, County of Le Sueur Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Leslie E. Sheehy Lee v. Travis W. Kalis, County of Le Sueur Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Bergstedt, Wahlberg, Berquist Assocs., Inc. v. 7 Rothschild
Minn. 2022
Bergstedt, Wahlberg, Berquist Assocs.
Andrew Brewer, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Bergstedt, Wahlberg, Berquist Assocs.
Richard J. Hartfiel v. Raymond Wilburn Allison, T. J. Potter Trucking, Inc., Westfield Insurance Company, intervenor Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Richard J. Hartfiel v. Raymond Wilburn Allison, T. J. Potter Trucking, Inc., Westfield Insurance Company, intervenor Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“Generally, the existence of a contract, as well as the terms of that contract, are questions of fact to be determined by the fact-finder.” TNT Props., (citing Bergstedt, Wahlberg, Berquist Assocs., Inc. v. Rothchild, 302 Minn. 476, 480, ).
David Dennis Schroer v. Thomas Redmond Minn. Ct. App. 2015
David Dennis Schroer v. Thomas Redmond Minn. Ct. App. 2015
The terms of a “contract are questions of fact to be determined by the factfinder.” Bergstedt, Wahlberg, Berquist Assocs., Inc. v. Rothchild, 302 Minn. 476, 480
George E. Antrim, III, PLLC v. Samar Sabri a/k/a Samar M. Tomala a/k/a Samar Meri Tomala a/k/a Samar … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
George E. Antrim, III, PLLC v. Samar Sabri a/k/a Samar M. Tomala a/k/a Samar Meri Tomala a/k/a Samar … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
v. Rothchild, 302 Minn. 476, 479, d 261, 263 (1975).
County of Hennepin v. 1010 Metrodome Square, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2014
County of Hennepin v. 1010 Metrodome Square, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In the absence of an express agreement, “the law may imply a contract from the circumstances or acts of the parties.” Bergstedt, Wahlberg, Berquist Assocs., Inc. v. Rothchild, 302 Minn. 476, 479
TNT Properties, Ltd. v. Tri-Star Developers LLC 677 N.W.2d 94 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
TNT Properties, Ltd. v. Tri-Star Developers LLC 677 N.W.2d 94 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Bergstedt, Wahlberg, Berquist Assocs., Inc. v. Rothchild, 302 Minn. 476
Modern Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc. v. Loop Belden Porter 493 N.W.2d 296 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Modern Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc. v. Loop Belden Porter 493 N.W.2d 296 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Bergstedt, Wahlberg, Berquist Assocs., Inc. v. Rothchild, 302 Minn. 476, 479-80
Stubbs v. North Memorial Medical Center 448 N.W.2d 78 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Stubbs v. North Memorial Medical Center 448 N.W.2d 78 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Bergstedt, Wahlberg, Berquist Associates, Inc. v. Rothchild, 802 Minn. 476 , 480
Kilton v. RICHARD G. NADLER & ASSOCIATES 447 N.W.2d 468 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Kilton v. RICHARD G. NADLER & ASSOCIATES 447 N.W.2d 468 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Bergstedt, Wahlberg, Berquist Associates, Inc. v. Rothchild, 302 Minn. 476, 479
Peters v. Mutual Benefit Life Insurance Co. 420 N.W.2d 908 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Peters v. Mutual Benefit Life Insurance Co. 420 N.W.2d 908 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
1, 1984) (citing Bergstedt, Wahlberg, Berquist Associates, Inc. v. Rothchild, 302 Minn. 476, 480 , ).
Georgens v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. 406 N.W.2d 95 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Georgens v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. 406 N.W.2d 95 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Bergstedt, Waklberg, Berquist Associates, Inc. v. Rothchild, 302 Minn. 476, 479
Lynn Beechler Realty Co. v. Warnygora 396 N.W.2d 717 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Lynn Beechler Realty Co. v. Warnygora 396 N.W.2d 717 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Bergstedt, Wahlberg, Bergquist Associates, Inc. v. Rothchild, 302 Minn. 476, 479-80
House v. Baxter 383 N.W.2d 717 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
House v. Baxter 383 N.W.2d 717 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
See Bergstedt, Wahlberg, Berquist Associates, Inc. v. Rothchild, 302 Minn. 476, 479-80
Paving Plus, Inc. v. Professional Investment, Inc. 382 N.W.2d 912 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Paving Plus, Inc. v. Professional Investment, Inc. 382 N.W.2d 912 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Bergstedt, Wahlberg, Berquist Associates, Inc. v. Rothchild, 302 Minn. 476, 479
Brookshaw v. South St. Paul Feed, Inc. 381 N.W.2d 33 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Brookshaw v. South St. Paul Feed, Inc. 381 N.W.2d 33 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Bergstedt, Wahlberg, Berquist Associates, Inc. v. Rothchild, 302 Minn. 476, 480
Spearman v. Salminen 379 N.W.2d 627 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Spearman v. Salminen 379 N.W.2d 627 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
See Bergstedt, Wahlberg, Berquist Associates, Inc. v. Rothchild, 302 Minn. 476, 479 , (“It is the objective thing, the manifestation of mutual assent, which is essential to the making of a contract”).
In Re Estate of Beecham 378 N.W.2d 800 Minn. 1985
In Re Estate of Beecham 378 N.W.2d 800 Minn. 1985
Bergstedt, Wahlberg, Berquist Associates, Inc. v. Rothchild, 302 Minn. 476, 479-80
Weber Ex Rel. Sanft v. Goetzke 371 N.W.2d 611 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Weber Ex Rel. Sanft v. Goetzke 371 N.W.2d 611 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Bergstedt, Wahlberg, Berquist, and Rothchild, 302 Minn. 476, 479
Eklund v. Vincent Brass and Aluminum Co. 351 N.W.2d 371 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Eklund v. Vincent Brass and Aluminum Co. 351 N.W.2d 371 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
“Not only the existence of a contract, but also the terms and construction of that contract are questions of fact to be determined by the factfinder.” Bergstedt, Wahlberg, Berquist Associates, Inc. v. Rothchild, 302 Minn. 476, 480
Frost v. COM'R OF PUBLIC SAFETY FOR STATE 348 N.W.2d 803 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Frost v. COM'R OF PUBLIC SAFETY FOR STATE 348 N.W.2d 803 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
v. Rothchild, 302 Minn. 476
R & T Equipment v. Nasers 346 N.W.2d 678 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
R & T Equipment v. Nasers 346 N.W.2d 678 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Bergstedt, Wahlberg, Berquist Assoc., Inc. v. Rothchild, 302 Minn. 476
AFSCME Councils 6, 14, 65 & 96, AFL-CIO v. Sundquist 338 N.W.2d 560 Minn. 1983
AFSCME Councils 6, 14, 65 & 96, AFL-CIO v. Sundquist 338 N.W.2d 560 Minn. 1983
See Bergstedt, Wahlberg, Berquist Associates, Inc. v. Rothchild, 302 Minn. 476, 479-80
Holman Erection Co. v. Orville E. Madsen & Sons, Inc. 330 N.W.2d 693 Minn. 1983
Holman Erection Co. v. Orville E. Madsen & Sons, Inc. 330 N.W.2d 693 Minn. 1983
See Bergstedt, Wahlberg, Berquist Associates, Inc. v. Rothchild, 302 Minn. 476, 479

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by