Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Hendry v. Conner, 226 N.W.2d 921.

29 citing documents.

In the Matter of Minnesota Living Assistance, Inc., d/b/a Baywood Home Care. Minn. 2019
at 236 (Tomljanovich, J., dissenting) (“ ‘Minnesota has never recognized, either by legislative or court action, a cause of action for invasion of privacy.’ ”).
Dickhoff ex rel. Dickhoff v. Green 836 N.W.2d 321 Minn. 2013
Dickhoff ex rel. Dickhoff v. Green 836 N.W.2d 321 Minn. 2013
Bodah v. Lakeville Motor Express, Inc. 663 N.W.2d 550 Minn. 2003
Bodah v. Lakeville Motor Express, Inc. 663 N.W.2d 550 Minn. 2003
1518, 1520-21 (D.Utah 1997); see also Hendry v. Conner, 303 Minn. 317, 319 , -23 (1975) (concluding, pre-Lafce, that statement made by hospital credit department employee in loud voice in the presence of people in waiting room that plaintiffs child could not be admitted to the hospital unless an outstanding bill was paid would not constitute “publicity”).
Bodah v. Lakeville Motor Express, Inc. 649 N.W.2d 859 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Bodah v. Lakeville Motor Express, Inc. 649 N.W.2d 859 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Although the supreme court addressed the question of publicity in Hendry v. Conner, 303 Minn. 317 , its status post Lake is doubtful.
Lake v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 582 N.W.2d 231 Minn. 1998
Lake v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 582 N.W.2d 231 Minn. 1998
Hendry v. Conner, 303 Minn. 317, 319
Lake v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 566 N.W.2d 376 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Lake v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 566 N.W.2d 376 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Hendry v. Conner, 303 Minn. 317, 319
Richie v. Paramount Pictures Corp. 544 N.W.2d 21 Minn. 1996
Richie v. Paramount Pictures Corp. 544 N.W.2d 21 Minn. 1996
However, this court “has never recognized, either by legislative or court action, a cause of action for invasion of privacy, even though many other states have done so.” Hendry v. Conner, 303 Minn. 317 , To allow emotional harm as the basis of a defamation action would be inconsistent with this court’s rejection of invasion of privacy claims.
Estate of Benson Ex Rel. Benson v. Minnesota Board of Medical Practice 526 N.W.2d 634 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Estate of Benson Ex Rel. Benson v. Minnesota Board of Medical Practice 526 N.W.2d 634 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
See Restatement (Second) of Torts § 6521 (privacy right is purely personal); Hendry v. Conner, 303 Minn. 317, 319 , (Minnesota has never recognized an action for invasion of privacy); (same).
Copeland v. Hubbard Broadcasting, Inc. 526 N.W.2d 402 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Copeland v. Hubbard Broadcasting, Inc. 526 N.W.2d 402 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
See Hendry v. Conner, 303 Minn. 317, 319 , House v. Sports Films & Talents, Inc., -81 (Minn.App.1989).
Robbinsdale Clinic, P.A. v. Pro-Life Action Ministries 515 N.W.2d 88 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Robbinsdale Clinic, P.A. v. Pro-Life Action Ministries 515 N.W.2d 88 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Hendry v. Conner, 303 Minn. 317, 319 , -81 (Minn.App.1989) (invasion of privacy action not allowed against physician who published “before” and “after” photographs of patient), pet.
Markgraf v. Douglas Corp. 468 N.W.2d 80 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Markgraf v. Douglas Corp. 468 N.W.2d 80 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
See Hendry v. Conner, 303 Minn. 317, 319
Stubbs v. North Memorial Medical Center 448 N.W.2d 78 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Stubbs v. North Memorial Medical Center 448 N.W.2d 78 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Hendry v. Conner, 303 Minn. 317, 319
Bohdan v. Alltool Mfg., Co. 411 N.W.2d 902 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Bohdan v. Alltool Mfg., Co. 411 N.W.2d 902 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Hendry v. Conner, 303 Minn. 317, 319 , House v. Sports Films & Talents, Inc.
Tibbetts v. Crossroads, Inc. 411 N.W.2d 535 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Tibbetts v. Crossroads, Inc. 411 N.W.2d 535 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
See Hendry v. Conner, 303 Minn. 317
House v. Sports Films & Talents, Inc. 351 N.W.2d 684 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
House v. Sports Films & Talents, Inc. 351 N.W.2d 684 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Hendry v. Conner, 303 Minn. 317, 319