Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State, Department of Public Safety v. Mulvihill, 227 N.W.2d 813.

33 citing documents.

State v. Lemmer 736 N.W.2d 650 Minn. 2007
State v. Lemmer 736 N.W.2d 650 Minn. 2007
Safety v. Mulvihill, 303 Minn. 361, 368 , (noting that license revocation is imposed by the commissioner “regardless of the outcome of the criminal proceeding”); House, 291 Minn, at 425-26, d at 95 (concluding that the county attorney has no authority to litigate implied consent proceedings without receiving permissi
State v. Wagner 637 N.W.2d 330 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
State v. Wagner 637 N.W.2d 330 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Safety v. Mulvihill, 303 Minn. 361, 368 , State, Dep’t of Pub.
State v. Victorsen 627 N.W.2d 655 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
State v. Victorsen 627 N.W.2d 655 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Safety v. Mulvihill, 303 Minn. 361, 368 , -18 (1975)).
Howard v. City of St. Louis Park 466 N.W.2d 759 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Howard v. City of St. Louis Park 466 N.W.2d 759 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Safety v. Mulvihill, 303 Minn. 361, 368
McDonnell v. Commissioner of Public Safety 460 N.W.2d 363 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Vang v. Commissioner of Public Safety 432 N.W.2d 203 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Vang v. Commissioner of Public Safety 432 N.W.2d 203 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
See State, Department of Public Safety v. Mulvihill, 303 Minn. 361, 368 , -18 (1975).
Wolle v. Commissioner of Public Safety 413 N.W.2d 258 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Wolle v. Commissioner of Public Safety 413 N.W.2d 258 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In State, Department of Public Safety v. Mulvihill, 303 Minn. 361 , the supreme court held a person claiming to have reasonable grounds for refusal under Schlief would have to meet a three-part test showing: (1) At the time of the refusal, he must intend to plead guilty to a charge of violating Minn.St.
Smisek v. Commissioner of Public Safety 400 N.W.2d 766 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Smisek v. Commissioner of Public Safety 400 N.W.2d 766 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State, Department of Public Safety v. Mulvihill, 303 Minn. 361, 367-68
Omdahl v. Commissioner of Public Safety 383 N.W.2d 720 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Omdahl v. Commissioner of Public Safety 383 N.W.2d 720 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
The court relied on two prior cases, State, Department of Highways v. Schlief, 289 Minn. 461 , and State, Department of Public Safety v. *722 Mulvihill, 303 Minn. 361
State v. Hanson 356 N.W.2d 689 Minn. 1984
State v. Hanson 356 N.W.2d 689 Minn. 1984
See, e.g., State, Dept. of Public Safety v. Mulvihill, 303 Minn. 361
Complaint Concerning Kirby 354 N.W.2d 410 Minn. 1984
Complaint Concerning Kirby 354 N.W.2d 410 Minn. 1984
5 (1969), and our prior decision in Dept. of Public Safety v. Mulvihill, 303 Minn. 361, 368 , -18 (1975), a trial court had the right to stay the revocation of drivers' licenses.
Goblisch v. Commissioner of Public Safety 348 N.W.2d 76 Minn. 1984
Goblisch v. Commissioner of Public Safety 348 N.W.2d 76 Minn. 1984
We applied the same analysis used in Schlief to the case of State, Department of Public Safety v. Mulvihill, 303 Minn. 361
State of Minn., City of Burnsville v. Juarez 345 N.W.2d 801 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State of Minn., City of Burnsville v. Juarez 345 N.W.2d 801 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Safety v. Mulvihill, 303 Minn. 361, 368 , -18 (1975) (emphasis in original).
State, Department of Public Safety v. Juncewski 308 N.W.2d 316 Minn. 1981
State, Department of Public Safety v. Juncewski 308 N.W.2d 316 Minn. 1981
See, e. g., (the primary thrust of such laws “is remedial and intended to protect public safety on the highway”); State v. Mulvihill, 303 Minn. 361, 363 , (decisions restricting application of implied consent law to be narrowly construed); State v. Beckey, 291 Minn. 483, 487 , (“our implied consent law is designed to aid the proper enforcement of our driving-while-under-the-influence statute”); State v. Halvor
Novak v. Kirby 287 N.W.2d 621 Minn. 1979
Novak v. Kirby 287 N.W.2d 621 Minn. 1979
It is triggered by the outcome of the criminal proceeding and is imposed through the judicial system.” State, Dep’t of Public Safety v. Mulvihili, 303 Minn. 361, 368 , -18 (1975).
State, Department of Public Safety v. Lang 227 N.W.2d 821 Minn. 1975
State, Department of Public Safety v. Stavaas 227 N.W.2d 819 Minn. 1975
State, Department of Public Safety v. Stavaas 227 N.W.2d 819 Minn. 1975
The second issue raised by defendant is controlled by our decision in State, Department of Public Safety v. Mulvihill, 303 Minn. 361
State, Department of Public Safety v. Lang 227 N.W.2d 821 Minn. 1975
The instant case is controlled by our decision in State, Department of Public Safety, v. Mulvihill, 303 Minn. 361

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by