Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Steinhaus v. Adamson, 228 N.W.2d 865.

29 citing documents.

Steiner v. Beaudry Oil & Service, Inc. 545 N.W.2d 39 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Steiner v. Beaudry Oil & Service, Inc. 545 N.W.2d 39 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
See Steinhaus v. Adamson, 304 Minn. 14, 22-23 , (no prejudicial error when trial court explained to jury that damage award of $100,-000 would be reduced by $40,000 if plaintiff found 40% at fault).
Lieser v. Sexton 441 N.W.2d 805 Minn. 1989
Lieser v. Sexton 441 N.W.2d 805 Minn. 1989
See Busch v. Busch Const., Inc., -96 (Minn.1977); Steinhaus v. Adamson, 304 Minn. 14, 21
Olsen v. Special School Dist. No. 1 427 N.W.2d 707 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Olsen v. Special School Dist. No. 1 427 N.W.2d 707 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
See Steinhaus v. Adamson, 304 Minn. 14, 21 , (“it was error for the trial court to refuse to instruct the jury that any amount it awarded for loss of future earnings capacity must be reduced to its present value”); Busch, d at 396 (a jury instruction which stated “damages must be discounted to present cash value” fairly
Clark v. Johnson Bros. Construction 370 N.W.2d 896 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Clark v. Johnson Bros. Construction 370 N.W.2d 896 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
See Steinhaus v. Adamson, 304 Minn. 14, 21 , -70 (1975); Ahlstrom v. Minneapolis, St.
Yates v. Hanna Min. Co., Inc. 365 N.W.2d 783 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Yates v. Hanna Min. Co., Inc. 365 N.W.2d 783 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Steinhaus v. Adamson, 304 Minn. 14, 20
Independent School District No. 14 v. AMPRO Corp. 361 N.W.2d 138 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Independent School District No. 14 v. AMPRO Corp. 361 N.W.2d 138 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
See, e.g., Steinhaus v. Adamson, 304 Minn. 14, 20
Jones v. Fleischhacker 325 N.W.2d 633 Minn. 1982
Jones v. Fleischhacker 325 N.W.2d 633 Minn. 1982
Steinhaus v. Adamson, 304 Minn. 14, 20
Sandhofer v. Abbott-Northwestern Hospital 283 N.W.2d 362 Minn. 1979
Sandhofer v. Abbott-Northwestern Hospital 283 N.W.2d 362 Minn. 1979
See, Steinhaus v. Adamson, 304 Minn. 14, 20 , Riley v. Lake, 295 Minn. 43, 58
Woodrow v. Tobler 269 N.W.2d 910 Minn. 1978
Woodrow v. Tobler 269 N.W.2d 910 Minn. 1978
Riley v. Lake, 295 Minn. 43, 58 , See, also, Steinhaus v. Adamson, 304 Minn. 14
Lamke v. Louden 269 N.W.2d 53 Minn. 1978
Lamke v. Louden 269 N.W.2d 53 Minn. 1978
Riley v. Lake, supra; Steinhaus v. Adamson, 304 Minn. 14 , Cooper v. Friesen, 296 Minn. 160
Sikes v. Garrett 262 N.W.2d 681 Minn. 1977
Ossenfort Ex Rel. Ossenfort v. Associated Milk Producers, Inc. 254 N.W.2d 672 Minn. 1977
Ossenfort Ex Rel. Ossenfort v. Associated Milk Producers, Inc. 254 N.W.2d 672 Minn. 1977
Steinhaus v. Adamson, 304 Minn. 14
Meinke v. Lewandowski 237 N.W.2d 387 Minn. 1975
Meinke v. Lewandowski 237 N.W.2d 387 Minn. 1975
This is supposed to be your decision.” Steinhaus v. Adamson, 304 Minn. 14, 19
Rosenthal v. Kolars 231 N.W.2d 285 Minn. 1975
Distinguished Rosenthal v. Kolars 231 N.W.2d 285 Minn. 1975
This is so despite our recent decision of Steinhaus v. Adamson, 304 Minn. 14 , where a similar occurrence took place and where we held it was not prejudicial.
Ramirez v. Miska 228 N.W.2d 871 Minn. 1975
Ramirez v. Miska 228 N.W.2d 871 Minn. 1975
We have expressly so held in Steinhaus v. Adamson, 304 Minn. 14