Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Peterson v. Peterson, 231 N.W.2d 85.

30 citing documents.

Head v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. 449 N.W.2d 449 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Head v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. 449 N.W.2d 449 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Peterson v. Peterson, 304 Minn. 578
Marriage of Kruschel v. Kruschel 419 N.W.2d 119 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Marriage of Kruschel v. Kruschel 419 N.W.2d 119 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Peterson v. Peterson, 304 Minn. 578, 580
Marriage of Quaid v. Quaid 403 N.W.2d 904 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Quaid v. Quaid 403 N.W.2d 904 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
e pursuant to a dissolution decree); *907 (although obligor’s employment had been sporadic since the sale of his business, it was appropriate to continue his $300 support obligation when he was receiving $1500 per month under an installment contract for the sale of the business and showed no change in his standard of living); Peterson v. Peterson, 304 Minn. 578, 579-80 , -87 (1975) (trial court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to reduce obligor’s $350 support obligation, despite obligor’
Marriage of James v. James 397 N.W.2d 587 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of James v. James 397 N.W.2d 587 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Peterson v. Peterson, 304 Minn. 578, 580 , (per curiam).
Sulzbach v. Sulzbach 395 N.W.2d 451 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Sulzbach v. Sulzbach 395 N.W.2d 451 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
ANALYSIS 1.Denial of Motion to Forgive Arrearages The trial court’s decision on motions to terminate alimony obligations and cancel arrearages will not be reversed “absent a clear showing of abuse of discretion.” Peterson v. Peterson, 304 Minn. 578, 580 , (citing Schmidt v. Schmidt, 275 Minn. 268 , ).
Marriage of Sand v. Sand 379 N.W.2d 119 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Sand v. Sand 379 N.W.2d 119 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Peterson v. Peterson, 304 Minn. 578
Marriage of Erickson v. Erickson 367 N.W.2d 685 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Erickson v. Erickson 367 N.W.2d 685 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
(citing Peterson v. Peterson, 304 Minn. 578 , and Hennessy v. Stelton, 302 Minn. 550 , ).
Marriage of Nelson v. Nelson 371 N.W.2d 19 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Nelson v. Nelson 371 N.W.2d 19 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Peterson v. Peterson, 304 Minn. 578
Packer v. Holm 364 N.W.2d 506 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Packer v. Holm 364 N.W.2d 506 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
(citing Peterson v. Peterson, 304 Minn. 578 , Hennessy v. Stelton, 302 Minn. 550 , ).
In Re the Marriage of Tell v. Tell 359 N.W.2d 298 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
In Re the Marriage of Abuzzahab v. Abuzzahab 359 N.W.2d 329 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
In Re the Marriage of Tell v. Tell 359 N.W.2d 298 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
(citing Peterson v. Peterson, 304 Minn. 578 , and Hennessy v. Shelton, 302 Minn. 550 , ).
In Re the Marriage of Abuzzahab v. Abuzzahab 359 N.W.2d 329 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Kaiser v. Kaiser, 290 Minn. 173, 179 , Peterson v. Peterson, 304 Minn. 578, 580
Marriage of Kelzenberg v. Kelzenberg 352 N.W.2d 845 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Marriage of Kelzenberg v. Kelzenberg 352 N.W.2d 845 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Peterson v. Peterson, 304 Minn. 578, 580
In Re the Marriage of Braun v. Braun 350 N.W.2d 492 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
In Re the Marriage of Braun v. Braun 350 N.W.2d 492 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Peterson v. Peterson, 304 Minn. 578 , Hennessy v. Stelton, 302 Minn. 550
Reck v. Reck 346 N.W.2d 675 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Reck v. Reck 346 N.W.2d 675 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Peterson v. Peterson, 304 Minn. 578 , Hennessy v. Stelton, 302 Minn. 550
Wiese v. Wiese 295 N.W.2d 371 Minn. 1980
Wiese v. Wiese 295 N.W.2d 371 Minn. 1980
Peterson v. Peterson, 304 Minn. 578 , Rubenstein v. Rubenstein, 295 Minn. 29