Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Del Hayes & Sons, Inc. v. Mitchell, 230 N.W.2d 588.

98 citing documents.

Frey v. Ramsey County Community Human Services 517 N.W.2d 591 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Frey v. Ramsey County Community Human Services 517 N.W.2d 591 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Del Hayes & Sons, Inc. v. Mitchell, 304 Minn. 275, 283
Estate of Riedel Ex Rel. Mirick v. Life Care Retirement Communities, Inc. 505 N.W.2d 78 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Estate of Riedel Ex Rel. Mirick v. Life Care Retirement Communities, Inc. 505 N.W.2d 78 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Del Hayes & Sons, Inc. v. Mitchell, 304 Minn. 275, 280 , -92 (1975).
Modern Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc. v. Loop Belden Porter 493 N.W.2d 296 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Modern Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc. v. Loop Belden Porter 493 N.W.2d 296 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Del Hayes & *299 Sons, Inc. v. Mitchell, 304 Minn. 275, 278-79 , (citing McAllister v. Independent Sch.
Minneapolis Teachers Retirement Fund Ass'n v. State 490 N.W.2d 124 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Minneapolis Teachers Retirement Fund Ass'n v. State 490 N.W.2d 124 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
(quoting Del Hayes & Sons, Inc. v. Mitchell, 304 Minn. 275, 283 , ).
Rural American Bank of Greenwald v. Herickhoff 473 N.W.2d 361 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Rural American Bank of Greenwald v. Herickhoff 473 N.W.2d 361 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
See Del Hayes & Sons, Inc. v. Mitchell, 304 Minn. 275, 284-85 , (promissory estoppel may be used to remove an oral contract from the statute of frauds).
Zimprich v. Stratford Homes, Inc. 453 N.W.2d 557 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Zimprich v. Stratford Homes, Inc. 453 N.W.2d 557 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Del Hayes & Sons, Inc. v. Mitchell, 304 Minn. 275, 281
McElwain v. Van Beek 447 N.W.2d 442 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
McElwain v. Van Beek 447 N.W.2d 442 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
26, 1988) (citing Del Hayes & Sons, Inc. v. Mitchell, 304 Minn. 275, 280 , -92 (1975)).
Federal Land Bank of Saint Paul v. Obermoller 429 N.W.2d 251 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Federal Land Bank of Saint Paul v. Obermoller 429 N.W.2d 251 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Del Hayes & Sons, Inc. v. Mitchell, 304 Minn. 275, 280 , -92 (1975).
Franklin Auto Body Co. v. Wicker 414 N.W.2d 509 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Franklin Auto Body Co. v. Wicker 414 N.W.2d 509 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Del Hayes & Sons, Inc. v. Mitchell, 304 Minn. 275, 280 , -92 (1975).
Wurm v. John Deere Leasing Co. 405 N.W.2d 484 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Wurm v. John Deere Leasing Co. 405 N.W.2d 484 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Respondents argue that appellant was not prejudiced by the lack of notice, and therefore, the motion was properly granted, citing Del Hayes & Sons, Inc. v. Mitchell, 304 Minn. 275
Wikert v. Northern Sand and Gravel, Inc. 402 N.W.2d 178 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Wikert v. Northern Sand and Gravel, Inc. 402 N.W.2d 178 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
However, in Del Hayes & Sons, Inc. v. Mitchell, 304 Minn. 275 , the court approved the trial court’s granting summary judgment sua sponte on the day of trial without notice to the parties and affirmed dismissal of defendant’s counterclaim.
Marriage of Shandorf v. Shandorf 401 N.W.2d 439 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Shandorf v. Shandorf 401 N.W.2d 439 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Del Hayes & Sons, Inc., v. Mitchell, 304 Minn. 275, 280 , -92 (1975).
Ruddy v. Ford Motor Co. 399 N.W.2d 634 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Ruddy v. Ford Motor Co. 399 N.W.2d 634 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
See Del Hayes & Sons, Inc. v. Mitch *637 ell, 304 Minn. 275 , (court has inherent power to enter summary judgment on its own motion when there remains no genuine issue of material fact and where one party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law).
Kessel v. Kessel 370 N.W.2d 889 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Kessel v. Kessel 370 N.W.2d 889 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
See Del Hayes & Sons, Inc. v. Mitchell, 304 Minn. 275, 285-86 , -95 (1975).
MTS CO. v. Taiga Corp. 365 N.W.2d 321 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
MTS CO. v. Taiga Corp. 365 N.W.2d 321 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
One of the elements of equitable estop-pel is “conduct — acts, language, or silence — amounting to a representation or concealment of material facts.” Del Hayes & Sons, Inc. v. Mitchell, 304 Minn. 275, 285 , quoting from 3 Pomeroy, Equity Jurisprudence (5 ed.), § 805.
Schatz v. Davis 354 N.W.2d 522 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Schatz v. Davis 354 N.W.2d 522 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Del Hayes & Sons, Inc. v. Mitchell, 304 Minn. 275, 288 , , 355 n. 2 (Minn.1979).
Christensen v. Minneapolis Municipal Employees Retirement Board 331 N.W.2d 740 Minn. 1983
Christensen v. Mpls. Mun. Emp. Retire. Bd. 331 N.W.2d 740 Minn. 1983
Explained Christensen v. Minneapolis Municipal Employees Retirement Board 331 N.W.2d 740 Minn. 1983
In Del Hayes & Sons, Inc. v. Mitchell, 304 Minn. 275, 283 , we explained that: Promissory estoppel is the name applied to a contract implied in law where no contract exists in fact.
Explained Christensen v. Mpls. Mun. Emp. Retire. Bd. 331 N.W.2d 740 Minn. 1983
In Del Hayes & Sons, Inc. v. Mitchell, 304 Minn. 275, 283 , we explained that: Promissory estoppel is the name applied to a contract implied in law where no contract exists in fact.
Sigler v. First American National Bank of St. Cloud 325 N.W.2d 136 Minn. 1982
Sigler v. First American National Bank of St. Cloud 325 N.W.2d 136 Minn. 1982
Del Hayes & Sons, Inc. v. Mitchell, 304 Minn. 275 , Ehmke v. Hill, 236 Minn. 60
Grouse v. Group Health Plan, Inc. 306 N.W.2d 114 Minn. 1981
Grouse v. Group Health Plan, Inc. 306 N.W.2d 114 Minn. 1981
Del Hayes & Sons, Inc. v. Mitchell, 304 Minn. 275
Lunning v. Land O'Lakes 303 N.W.2d 452 Minn. 1980
Lunning v. Land O'Lakes 303 N.W.2d 452 Minn. 1980
We acknowledged in Del Hayes & Sons, Inc. v. Mitchell, 304 Minn. 275 , that there are currently two views of promissory es-toppel, one restrictive, one expansive.
W. H. Barber Co. v. McNamara-Vivant Contracting Co. 293 N.W.2d 351 Minn. 1979
W. H. Barber Co. v. McNamara-Vivant Contracting Co. 293 N.W.2d 351 Minn. 1979
Del Hayes & Sons, Inc. v. Mitchell, 304 Minn. 275, 285
Jurek v. Thompson 241 N.W.2d 788 Minn. 1976
Jurek v. Thompson 241 N.W.2d 788 Minn. 1976
Elevator *203 v. Johnson, 305 Minn. 324 , Del Hayes & Sons, Inc. v. Mitchell, 304 Minn. 275
Sacred Heart Farmers Cooperative Elevator v. Johnson 232 N.W.2d 921 Minn. 1975
Sacred Heart Farmers Cooperative Elevator v. Johnson 232 N.W.2d 921 Minn. 1975
Regarding our recent decision in Del Hayes & Sons, Inc. v. Mitchell, *326 304 Minn. 275 , as controlling, we hold that defendant is not estopped to assert the statute of frauds as a complete defense to this action and reverse.