Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite City of Minneapolis v. Buschette, 240 N.W.2d 500.

37 citing documents.

Victor Cortez Shelton, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
But “the issue of discriminatory enforcement does not go to the guilt or innocence of the particular defendant.” d 500, 503 (Minn. 1976).
In the Matter of the Welfare of: N. R. C.-A., Child. Minn. Ct. App. 2021
The Fourteenth Amendment “forbids the discriminatory enforcement of nondiscriminatory laws.” City of Minneapolis v. Buschette
State of Minnesota v. Danyelle Raymon Williams Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Danyelle Raymon Williams Minn. Ct. App. 2014
City of Minneapolis v. Buschette, 307 Minn. 60, 64
In re the Welfare of B.A.H. 845 N.W.2d 158 Minn. 2014
In re the Welfare of B.A.H. 845 N.W.2d 158 Minn. 2014
In particular, as relevant here, “the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment forbids the discriminatory enforcement of nondiscriminatory laws.” City of Minneapolis v. Buschette, 307 Minn. 60, 64
In re the Welfare of B.A.H. 829 N.W.2d 431 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
In re the Welfare of B.A.H. 829 N.W.2d 431 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
City of Minneapolis v. Buschette, 307 Minn. 60, 69
State v. Fellegy 819 N.W.2d 700 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
State v. Fellegy 819 N.W.2d 700 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
220 (1886); City of Minneapolis v. Buschette, 307 Minn. 60, 64 , (confirming that equal protection is an “unenumer-ated” constitutional right found in the state constitution (quotation omitted)).
Thul v. State 657 N.W.2d 611 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Thul v. State 657 N.W.2d 611 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
City of Minneapolis v. Buschette, 307 Minn. 60, 64 , (citation omitted).
State v. Krotzer 548 N.W.2d 252 Minn. 1996
State v. Jones 451 N.W.2d 55 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
State v. Jones 451 N.W.2d 55 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
ANALYSIS I. Generally, “[T]he equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment forbids the discriminatory enforcement of nondiscriminatory laws.” City of Minneapolis v. Buschette, 307 Minn. 60, 64
State v. Hyland 431 N.W.2d 868 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
State v. Hyland 431 N.W.2d 868 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
City of Minneapolis v. Buschette, 307 Minn. 60, 66
State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Ri-Mel, Inc. 417 N.W.2d 102 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Ri-Mel, Inc. 417 N.W.2d 102 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
497 (1944)); City of Minneapolis v. Buschette, 307 Minn. 60, 66
State v. Turner 382 N.W.2d 252 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Turner 382 N.W.2d 252 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
451, 457 , 50 L.Ed.2d 397 (1976); City of Minneapolis v. Buschette, 307 Minn. 60
State v. Woodard 378 N.W.2d 32 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
State v. Woodard 378 N.W.2d 32 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Two major Minnesota cases discuss the defense of discriminatory enforcement: and City of Minneapolis v. Busckette, 307 Minn. 60
State v. Waterston 371 N.W.2d 650 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
State v. Waterston 371 N.W.2d 650 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
See City of Minneapolis v. Buschette, 307 Minn. 60, 66
State v. L'ITALIEN 363 N.W.2d 490 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
State v. L'ITALIEN 363 N.W.2d 490 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
LTtalien argued at trial, although it should have been raised earlier, City of Minneapolis v. Buschette, 307 Minn. 60, 66 , that he was the victim of discriminatory prosecution.
State v. Russell 343 N.W.2d 36 Minn. 1984
State v. Russell 343 N.W.2d 36 Minn. 1984
In City of Minneapolis v. Buschette, 307 Minn. 60, 66 , this court’s leading case on discriminatory enforcement, we held that the defense of discriminatory enforcement by law enforcement officials applies, not only to a charge of common prostitution, as in that case, but on all levels of state criminal laws and municipal penal ordinances.
State Ex Rel. Spannaus v. Lutsen Resorts, Inc. 310 N.W.2d 495 Minn. 1981
State Ex Rel. Spannaus v. Lutsen Resorts, Inc. 310 N.W.2d 495 Minn. 1981
See City of Minneapolis v. Buschette, 307 Minn. 60
State v. Herme 298 N.W.2d 454 Minn. 1980
State v. Herme 298 N.W.2d 454 Minn. 1980
at 668-69 ; City of Minneapolis v. Buschette, 307 Minn. 60, 64-65 , State v. Andrews , 282 Minn, at 392, d at 532 .
State v. Olson 297 N.W.2d 297 Minn. 1980
State v. Olson 297 N.W.2d 297 Minn. 1980
Under City of Minneapolis v. Buschette, 307 Minn. 60 , a defendant charged with prostitution is entitled to a dismissal if he or she can *298 prove, at a pretrial hearing and by a clear preponderance of the evidence, intentional and purposeful discrimination in enforcement of the law.
State v. Larson Transfer & Storage, Inc. 246 N.W.2d 176 Minn. 1976
State v. Larson Transfer & Storage, Inc. 246 N.W.2d 176 Minn. 1976
City of Minneapolis v. Buschette, 307 Minn. 60