Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Dawley v. Thisius, 231 N.W.2d 555.

25 citing documents.

Rebecca A. Niebuhr, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
14 coemployee immunity) ( ).
Stringer v. Minnesota Vikings Football Club, LLC 705 N.W.2d 746 Minn. 2005
Stringer v. Minnesota Vikings Football Club, LLC 705 N.W.2d 746 Minn. 2005
The term “coemployee” includes a “corporate officer, general supervisor, or foreman.” Dawley v. Thisius, 304 Minn. 453, 455
Stringer v. Minnesota Vikings Football Club, LLC 686 N.W.2d 545 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Stringer v. Minnesota Vikings Football Club, LLC 686 N.W.2d 545 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Prior to the codification of co-employee immunity at section 176.061, the Minnesota Supreme Court considered the scope of this immunity in Dawley v. Thisius, 304 Minn. 453, 455 , holding: The acts of negligence for which a co-employee may be held liable must be acts constituting direct negligence toward the plaintiff, tortious acts in which he participated, or which he specifically directed others to do.
Buck v. Freeman 619 N.W.2d 793 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Buck v. Freeman 619 N.W.2d 793 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
5(c) (1998); Dawley v. Thisius, 304 Minn. 453, 456
Stelling v. Hanson Silo Co. 563 N.W.2d 286 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Stelling v. Hanson Silo Co. 563 N.W.2d 286 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Dawley v. Thisius, 304 Minn. 453, 456
Dayton Hudson Corp. v. Johnson 528 N.W.2d 260 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Dayton Hudson Corp. v. Johnson 528 N.W.2d 260 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
See Dawley v. Thisius, 304 Minn. 453, 456
Wicken v. Morris 527 N.W.2d 95 Minn. 1995
Wicken v. Morris 527 N.W.2d 95 Minn. 1995
Dawley v. Thisius, 304 Minn. 453, 455
Wicken v. Morris 510 N.W.2d 246 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Wicken v. Morris 510 N.W.2d 246 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Dawley v. Thisi-us, 304 Minn. 453, 456 , (indicating that the requirements of both Minn.Stat.
Wood v. Korn 503 N.W.2d 523 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Wood v. Korn 503 N.W.2d 523 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
In Dawley v. Thisius, 304 Minn. 453 , the supreme court limited instances in which an employee may sue a co-employee: The acts of negligence for which a co-employee may be held liable must be acts constituting direct negligence toward the plaintiff, tortious acts in which he participated, or which he specifically directed others t
Weber v. Gerads Development 442 N.W.2d 807 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Weber v. Gerads Development 442 N.W.2d 807 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Dawley v. Thisius, 304 Minn. 453
Ackerman v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 435 N.W.2d 835 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Ackerman v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 435 N.W.2d 835 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Prior to 1979, if a co-employee breached a personal duty “an employee injured in the course of employment * * * [could] bring an action against a co-employee for the latter’s negligence.” Dawley v. Thisius, 304 Minn. 453, 455 , (citation omitted).
Terveer v. Norling Bros. Silo Co., Inc. 365 N.W.2d 279 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Terveer v. Norling Bros. Silo Co., Inc. 365 N.W.2d 279 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Appellants argue based on Dawley v. Thisius, 304 Minn. 453 , that Palmer Norling violated a personal duty toward them by improperly designing and maintaining the scaffold.
Nelson v. Rodgers Hydraulic Inc. 351 N.W.2d 36 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Nelson v. Rodgers Hydraulic Inc. 351 N.W.2d 36 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Any right appellant may have to sue Whetstone is rooted in Dawley v. Thisius, 304 Minn. 453