45140
Precedential
Affirmed
Processed
Hovel v. Hovel
The holding in the court’s own words
We conclude that the underlying findings of the trial court are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears.
Quoted verbatim from the opinion — no paraphrase, nothing generated. Not yet human-reviewed. How we find the holding.
Opinion text
Per Curiam. We have carefully considered the records, briefs, and oral arguments of the parties on this appeal challenging the division of property adjudged below in a divorce action. We conclude that the underlying findings of the trial court are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. Since our decision would have no precedential value, we affirm without extended opinion. Affirmed.