Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Carlson-Lang Realty Co. v. City of Windom, 240 N.W.2d 517.

71 citing documents.

Holden v. City of Eagan 393 N.W.2d 526 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Carlson-Lang Realty Co. v. City of Windom, 307 Minn. 368, 373 , (citing G.C.
Bohm v. L.B. Hartz Wholesale Corp. 370 N.W.2d 901 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Bohm v. L.B. Hartz Wholesale Corp. 370 N.W.2d 901 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
See Carlson-Lang Realty Co. v. City of Windom, 307 Minn. 368
Sigurdson v. Isanti County 363 N.W.2d 476 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Sigurdson v. Isanti County 363 N.W.2d 476 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Carlson-Lang Realty Co. v. City of Windom, 307 Minn. 368
Tri-State Land Co. v. City of Shoreview 290 N.W.2d 775 Minn. 1980
Tri-State Land Co. v. City of Shoreview 290 N.W.2d 775 Minn. 1980
Carlson-Lang Realty Co. v. City of Windom, 307 Minn. 368, 369-70
Appeal of Ewert v. City of Winthrop 278 N.W.2d 545 Minn. 1979
Appeal of Ewert v. City of Winthrop 278 N.W.2d 545 Minn. 1979
Carlson-Lang Realty Co. v. City of Windom, 307 Minn. 368, 370
Buettner v. City of St. Cloud 277 N.W.2d 199 Minn. 1979
Buettner v. City of St. Cloud 277 N.W.2d 199 Minn. 1979
This is the basis of our opinion in Carlson-Lang Realty Co. v. City of Windom, 307 Minn. 368
Southview Country Club v. City of Inver Grove Heights, Dakota County 263 N.W.2d 385 Minn. 1978
Southview Country Club v. City of Inver Grove Heights, Dakota County 263 N.W.2d 385 Minn. 1978
2 In Carlson-Lang Realty Co. v. City of Windom, 307 Minn. 368, 369 , we reviewed the limitations on the power of special assessment as follows: “*** (a) The land must receive a special benefit from the improvement being constructed, (b) the assessment must be uniform upon the same class of property, and (c) the assessment may not exceed the special be
Joint Independent School District No. 287 v. City of Brooklyn Park 256 N.W.2d 512 Minn. 1977
Nelson v. City of St. Paul 256 N.W.2d 639 Minn. 1977
Joint Independent School District No. 287 v. City of Brooklyn Park 256 N.W.2d 512 Minn. 1977
The restraints upon a municipality’s power of special assessment were adequately summarized in Carlson-Lang Realty Co. v. City of Windom, Minn., : “We have stated the limitations on a city’s power of special assessment to be these: (a) The land must receive a special benefit from the improvement being constructed, (b) the assessment must be uniform upon the same class of property, and (c) the assessment may not exceed the special benefit.
Nelson v. City of St. Paul 256 N.W.2d 639 Minn. 1977
See, Gibbish v. Village of Burnsville, 294 Minn. 313 , Carlson-Lang Realty Co. v. City of Windom, Minn.
Nyquist v. Town Center, Crow Wing County 251 N.W.2d 695 Minn. 1977
Nyquist v. Town Center, Crow Wing County 251 N.W.2d 695 Minn. 1977
This difference in market value should be computed by determining “what a willing buyer would pay a willing seller for the property before, and then after, the improvement has been constructed.” Carlson-Lang Realty Co. v. City of Windom, 307 Minn. 368, 369
Edward Kraemer & Sons, Inc. v. Village of Burnsville 245 N.W.2d 445 Minn. 1976
Edward Kraemer & Sons, Inc. v. Village of Burnsville 245 N.W.2d 445 Minn. 1976
In Carlson-Lang Realty Co. v. City of Windom, 307 Minn. 368, 369 , we fully discussed how special benefit is to be determined, concluding that “[s] pedal benefit is measured by the increase in the market value of the land owing to the improvement.” In the case at bar, the trial court made no findings concerning special benefit.