Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Bisbee v. Ruppert, 235 N.W.2d 364.

66 citing documents.

Pietrzak v. Eggen 295 N.W.2d 504 Minn. 1980
Pietrzak v. Eggen 295 N.W.2d 504 Minn. 1980
Bisbee v. Ruppert, 306 Minn. 39
Sorenson v. Kruse 293 N.W.2d 56 Minn. 1980
Sorenson v. Kruse 293 N.W.2d 56 Minn. 1980
See Thill v. Modern Erecting Co., 272 Minn. 217 , Bisbee v. Ruppert, 306 Minn. 39 , Sandt v. Hylen, 301 Minn. 475
Robin v. Royal Improvement Co. 289 N.W.2d 76 Minn. 1979
Robin v. Royal Improvement Co. 289 N.W.2d 76 Minn. 1979
Accordingly, it seems advisable to suggest that the legislature amend the law to prevent a result which is not only unfair to employers but detrimental to those employees the statute is designed to protect.” 305 Minn. 397 , .
Busch v. Busch Construction, Inc. 262 N.W.2d 377 Minn. 1977
Busch v. Busch Construction, Inc. 262 N.W.2d 377 Minn. 1977
Bisbee v. Ruppert, 306 Minn. 39 , Hagen v. Swenson, 306 Minn. 527 , In re Petition of Sandt v. Hylen, 301 Minn. 475 , Stenzel v. Bach, 295 Minn. 257
Hake v. Soo Line Railway Co. 258 N.W.2d 576 Minn. 1977
Hake v. Soo Line Railway Co. 258 N.W.2d 576 Minn. 1977
Bisbee v. Ruppert, 306 Minn. 39 , Patton v. Minneapolis Street Ry.
Kalpin v. Helgeson 254 N.W.2d 378 Minn. 1977
Kalpin v. Helgeson 254 N.W.2d 378 Minn. 1977
Adrian v. Edstrom, 304 Minn. 52 , Cameron v. Evans, 241 Minn. 200 , Bisbee v. Ruppert, 306 Minn. 39
Lambertson v. Cincinnati Corp. 257 N.W.2d 679 Minn. 1977
Lambertson v. Cincinnati Corp. 257 N.W.2d 679 Minn. 1977
Bisbee v. Ruppert, 306 Minn. 39
State v. Schneider 249 N.W.2d 720 Minn. 1977
State v. Schneider 249 N.W.2d 720 Minn. 1977
Compare State v. Hicks, 301 Minn. 350 , with Bisbee v. Rupert, 306 Minn. 39