Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Lewis v. Citizens Agency of Madelia, Inc., 235 N.W.2d 831.

32 citing documents.

Bryan v. Kissoon 767 N.W.2d 491 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Bryan v. Kissoon 767 N.W.2d 491 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Lewis v. Citizens Agency of Madelia, Inc., 306 Minn. 194, 200
Radel v. Bloom Lake Farms 553 N.W.2d 109 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Radel v. Bloom Lake Farms 553 N.W.2d 109 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Lewis v. Citizens Agency of Madelia, Inc., 306 Minn. 194, 199
Hanks v. Hubbard Broadcasting, Inc. 493 N.W.2d 302 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Hanks v. Hubbard Broadcasting, Inc. 493 N.W.2d 302 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
See Lewis v. Citizens Agency of Madelia, Inc., 306 Minn. 194, 201
Estate of Jones Ex Rel. Blume v. Kvamme 449 N.W.2d 428 Minn. 1989
Estate of Jones Ex Rel. Blume v. Kvamme 449 N.W.2d 428 Minn. 1989
Lewis v. Citizens Agency of Madelia, Inc., 306 Minn. 194, 200
Sports Page, Inc. v. First Union Management, Inc. 438 N.W.2d 428 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Sports Page, Inc. v. First Union Management, Inc. 438 N.W.2d 428 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Lewis v. Citizens Agency of Madelia, Inc., 306 Minn. 194, 199
Runia v. Marguth Agency, Inc. 437 N.W.2d 45 Minn. 1989
Runia v. Marguth Agency, Inc. 437 N.W.2d 45 Minn. 1989
Negligent misrepresentation is grounds for liability in this state, even when the statement is the result of a mistake, Le wis v. Citizens Agency of Madelia, Inc., 306 Minn. 194, 198-199
ESTATE OF JONES BY BLUME v. Kvamme 430 N.W.2d 188 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
ESTATE OF JONES BY BLUME v. Kvamme 430 N.W.2d 188 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Lewis v. Citizens Agency of Madelia, Inc., 306 Minn. 194, 200
B.F. Goodrich Co. v. Mesabi Tire Co. 430 N.W.2d 180 Minn. 1988
B.F. Goodrich Co. v. Mesabi Tire Co. 430 N.W.2d 180 Minn. 1988
One such instance was Lewis v. Citizens Agency of Madelia, Inc., 306 Minn. 194
Veit v. Anderson 428 N.W.2d 429 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Veit v. Anderson 428 N.W.2d 429 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
(question to be asked in determining whether reliance is reasonable is “not whether the representation would deceive the average man” but whether the representation was calculated to deceive “a person of the capacity and experience of the particular individual”); Lewis v. Citizens Agency of Madelia, Inc., 306 Minn. 194, 199 , (person with “no special competence or expertise in insurance matters” was justified in relying on insurance agent’s interpretation of terms of policy).
Hughes v. Sinclair Marketing, Inc. 389 N.W.2d 194 Minn. 1986
Hughes v. Sinclair Marketing, Inc. 389 N.W.2d 194 Minn. 1986
See Lewis v. Citizens Agency of Madelia, Inc., 306 Minn. 194 , (return of premiums paid inadequately compensated an insured whose policy has been wrongfully terminated).
Johnson Building Co. v. River Bluff Development Co. 374 N.W.2d 187 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Johnson Building Co. v. River Bluff Development Co. 374 N.W.2d 187 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Lewis v. Citizens Agency of Madelia, Inc., 306 Minn. 194, 199
Vettleson v. Special School District No. 1 361 N.W.2d 425 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Vettleson v. Special School District No. 1 361 N.W.2d 425 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Lewis v. Citizens Agency of Madelia, Inc., 306 Minn. 194, 198-99 , -35 (1975).
Autrey v. Trkla 350 N.W.2d 409 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Autrey v. Trkla 350 N.W.2d 409 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Lewis v. Citizens Agency of Madelia, Inc., 306 Minn. 194, 200
Frank v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. 336 N.W.2d 307 Minn. 1983
Frank v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. 336 N.W.2d 307 Minn. 1983
Lewis v. Citizens Agency of Madelia, Inc., 306 Minn. 194, 198 , Gorco Construction Co. v. Stein, 256 Minn. 476, 478-79 , -73 (1959).
Raach v. Haverly 269 N.W.2d 877 Minn. 1978
Raach v. Haverly 269 N.W.2d 877 Minn. 1978
See, e. g., Lewis v. Citizens Agency of Madelia, Inc., 306 Minn. 194 , Rosenquist v. Baker, 227 Minn. 217
Jensen v. Peterson 264 N.W.2d 139 Minn. 1978
Jensen v. Peterson 264 N.W.2d 139 Minn. 1978
In Lewis v. Citizens Agency of Madelia, Inc., 306 Minn. 194 , the court affirmed a lower court’s damage award in a fraud case involving misrepresentations in the sale of insurance.