Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Tolbert v. Gerber Industries, Inc., 255 N.W.2d 362.

85 citing documents.

Zontelli & Sons, Inc. v. City of Nashwauk 373 N.W.2d 744 Minn. 1985
A party is entitled to be indemnified for its liability “[wjhere the one seeking indemnity has incurred liability because of a breach of duty owed to him by the one sought to be charged.” Tolbert v. Gerber Indus., Inc., Hendrickson v. Minnesota Power & Light Co., 258 Minn. 368, 373
Fossum v. Kraus-Anderson Construction Co. 372 N.W.2d 415 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Fossum v. Kraus-Anderson Construction Co. 372 N.W.2d 415 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Farmington Plumbing and Heating Co. v. Fischer Sand and Aggregate, Inc., Tolbert v. Gerber Industries, Inc.
Kempa v. E.W. Coons Co. 370 N.W.2d 414 Minn. 1985
Kempa v. E.W. Coons Co. 370 N.W.2d 414 Minn. 1985
Tolbert v. Gerber Industries, Inc.
Federated Mut. Ins. v. Amer. Family Mut. Ins. 350 N.W.2d 425 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Federated Mutual Insurance Co. v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 350 N.W.2d 425 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Federated Mut. Ins. v. Amer. Family Mut. Ins. 350 N.W.2d 425 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Hendrickson v. Minnesota Power & Light Co., 258 Minn. 368 , modified on other grounds, Tolbert v. Gerber Indus., Inc.
Federated Mutual Insurance Co. v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 350 N.W.2d 425 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Hendrickson v. Minnesota Power & Light Co., 258 Minn. 368 , modified on other grounds, Tolbert v. Gerber Indus., Inc.
Horton Ex Rel. Horton v. Orbeth, Inc. 342 N.W.2d 112 Minn. 1984
Hudson v. Snyder Body, Inc. 326 N.W.2d 149 Minn. 1982
Vesely, Otto, Miller & Keefe v. Blake 311 N.W.2d 3 Minn. 1981
Vesely, Otto, Miller & Keefe v. Blake 311 N.W.2d 3 Minn. 1981
White v. Johnson, 272 Minn. 363, 371 , overruled in part, *5
Jones v. Fisher 309 N.W.2d 726 Minn. 1981
Jones v. Fisher 309 N.W.2d 726 Minn. 1981
& Omaha Railway, 235 Minn. 304 , the running of a statute of limitations against a co-tortfeasor, see Gustafson v. Johnson, 235 Minn. 358, 364 , failure to provide statutory notice to a municipal co-tort-feasor, see White v. Johnson, 272 Minn. 363, 372 , overruled on other grounds; Tolbert v. Gerber Industries, Inc., -68 (1977); and failure to provide statutory notice to a dramshop defendant
Ploog v. Ogilvie 309 N.W.2d 49 Minn. 1981
Ploog v. Ogilvie 309 N.W.2d 49 Minn. 1981
Tolbert v. Gerber Industries, Inc., -68 (Minn.1977).
Polaris Industries v. Plastics, Inc. 299 N.W.2d 414 Minn. 1980
Polaris Industries v. Plastics, Inc. 299 N.W.2d 414 Minn. 1980
Reconciling the special verdicts applicable to Plastics’ liability the court properly held that Plastics was found negligent only as to “information supplied [to Polaris] concerning the polyethylene gasoline tanks.” In Tolbert v. Gerber Industries, Inc., we abrogated Rule 4 set forth in Hendrickson v. Minnesota Power & Light Co., 258 Minn. 368 , which had granted indemnity where the one seeking indemnity has incurred liability merely because of failure, even though negligent, to discover or
Ruberg v. Skelly Oil Co. 297 N.W.2d 746 Minn. 1980
Ruberg v. Skelly Oil Co. 297 N.W.2d 746 Minn. 1980
Inc., Note, Contribution and Indemnity-An Examination of the Upheaval in Minnesota Tort Loss Allocation Concepts, 5 Wm.
Lange Ex Rel. Lange v. Schweitzer 295 N.W.2d 387 Minn. 1980
Anderson Ex Rel. Anderson v. Stream 295 N.W.2d 595 Minn. 1980
Lange Ex Rel. Lange v. Schweitzer 295 N.W.2d 387 Minn. 1980
See Busch v. Busch Const., Inc., Lambertson v. Cincinnati Corp., 312 Minn. 114
Anderson Ex Rel. Anderson v. Stream 295 N.W.2d 595 Minn. 1980
Ford v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad 294 N.W.2d 844 Minn. 1980
Ford v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad 294 N.W.2d 844 Minn. 1980
The contribution clause is not affected by the decision in Tolbert v. Gerber Industries, Inc., requiring joint tort-feasors to bear losses in accordance with the jury’s allocation of fault rather than by common law indemnity.
Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. v. Milbank Mutual Insurance Co. 284 N.W.2d 180 Minn. 1979
Distinguished Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. v. Milbank Mutual Insurance Co. 284 N.W.2d 180 Minn. 1979
We distinguished those rules precisely on the basis of culpable negligence on the part of the claimant in Tolbert v. Gerber Industries, Inc.
Farmington Plumbing & Heating Co. v. Fischer Sand & Aggregate, Inc. 281 N.W.2d 838 Minn. 1979
Farmington Plumbing & Heating Co. v. Fischer Sand & Aggregate, Inc. 281 N.W.2d 838 Minn. 1979
We rejected the active/passive analysis for indemnity cases in Tolbert v. Gerber Industries, Inc.
Busch v. Busch Construction, Inc. 262 N.W.2d 377 Minn. 1977
Busch v. Busch Construction, Inc. 262 N.W.2d 377 Minn. 1977
Under our decision today, the concerns of the dissenting justices in Tolbert v. Gerber Industries, Inc., Minn., should be allayed insofar as a user or consumer who fails to discover a defect cannot be liable for contribution to a strictly liable distributor.
Frey v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc. 258 N.W.2d 782 Minn. 1977
Frey v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc. 258 N.W.2d 782 Minn. 1977
If found to be a Rule 4 situation, then we direct the attention of the court below to our recent decision in Tolbert v. Gerber Industries, Inc., Minn.