Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Vieths v. Thorp Finance Co., 232 N.W.2d 776.

27 citing documents.

Dimke v. Farr 802 N.W.2d 860 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Dimke v. Farr 802 N.W.2d 860 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
305 Minn. 522, 524 , -78 (1975).
C.O. v. Doe 757 N.W.2d 343 Minn. 2008
C.O. v. Doe 757 N.W.2d 343 Minn. 2008
E.g., Vieths v. Thorp Finance Co., 305 Minn. 522, 525 , (summary judgment is not a substitute for trial where there are fact issues to be determined).
Ciardelli v. Rindal 582 N.W.2d 910 Minn. 1998
Writers, Inc. v. West Bend Mutual Insurance Co. 465 N.W.2d 419 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Writers, Inc. v. West Bend Mutual Insurance Co. 465 N.W.2d 419 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Vieths v. Thorp Finance Co., 305 Minn. 522, 525
Clough v. Ertz 442 N.W.2d 798 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Clough v. Ertz 442 N.W.2d 798 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Vieths v. Thorp Finance Co., 305 Minn. 522, 524-25
Steen v. Those Underwriters at Lloyds, London Signatory to Policy No. E0100191 442 N.W.2d 158 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Steen v. Those Underwriters at Lloyds, London Signatory to Policy No. E0100191 442 N.W.2d 158 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Vieths v. Thorp Finance Co., 305 Minn. 522, 524-25
Peterson v. Fortier 406 N.W.2d 563 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Peterson v. Fortier 406 N.W.2d 563 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
The district court must view the evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, Vieths v. Thorp Finance Co., 305 Minn. 522, 525 , (per curiam), and on appeal this court must view the evidence most favorable to the one against whom the motion was granted.
Weihe v. Hendley 389 N.W.2d 754 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Weihe v. Hendley 389 N.W.2d 754 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Vie ths v. Thorp Finance Co., 305 Minn. 522, 525 , (citations omitted).
Woody v. Krueger 374 N.W.2d 822 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Woody v. Krueger 374 N.W.2d 822 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Vieths v. Thorp Finance Co., 305 Minn. 522, 525
Clemas v. Northern States Enterprises, Inc. 361 N.W.2d 149 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Clemas v. Northern States Enterprises, Inc. 361 N.W.2d 149 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Vieths v. Thorp Finance Co., 305 Minn. 522, 525
Grondahl v. Bulluck 318 N.W.2d 240 Minn. 1982
Grondahl v. Bulluck 318 N.W.2d 240 Minn. 1982
The district court must view the evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, Vieths v. Thorp Finance Co., 305 Minn. 522, 525 , (per curiam), and this court on appeal must view the evidence most favorably to the one against whom the motion was granted.
State Ex Rel. Spannaus v. Maple Hill Estates, Inc. 317 N.W.2d 53 Minn. 1982
State Ex Rel. Spannaus v. Maple Hill Estates, Inc. 317 N.W.2d 53 Minn. 1982
Harrington v. County of Ramsey 279 N.W.2d 791 Minn. 1979
Harrington v. County of Ramsey 279 N.W.2d 791 Minn. 1979
Vieths v. Thorp Finance Co., 305 Minn. 522
Corwine v. Crow Wing County 244 N.W.2d 482 Minn. 1976
Corwine v. Crow Wing County 244 N.W.2d 482 Minn. 1976
Vieths v. Thorp Finance Co. 305 Minn. 522 , Ahlm v. Rooney, 274 Minn. 259 , Abdal- *362 lah, Inc. v. Martin, 242 Minn. 416 , Willmore v. Willmore, 273 Minn. 537 , , certiorari denied, 385 U. S. 898 , 87 S. Ct. 202 , 17 L. ed. 2d 130 (1966).