Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Nieting v. Blondell, 235 N.W.2d 597.

112 citing documents.

Pirkov-Middaugh v. Gillette Children's Hospital 495 N.W.2d 608 Minn. 1993
Pirkov-Middaugh v. Gillette Children's Hospital 495 N.W.2d 608 Minn. 1993
It is, as the state contends, inconceivable that a legislature which responded so quickly to this court’s decision in Nieting v. Blondell, 306 Minn. 122 , to establish monetary limits on what might otherwise be unlimited tort liability for state governmental entities, could have intended the result reached by the courts below in this case.
Johnson v. State 478 N.W.2d 769 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Johnson v. State 478 N.W.2d 769 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
See Niet *774 ing v. Blondell, 306 Minn. 122 , (abolished sovereign immunity).
Rico v. State 472 N.W.2d 100 Minn. 1991
Rico v. State 472 N.W.2d 100 Minn. 1991
See Nieting v. Blondell, 306 Minn. 122, 132
Turner v. IDS Financial Services, Inc. 471 N.W.2d 105 Minn. 1991
Turner v. IDS Financial Services, Inc. 471 N.W.2d 105 Minn. 1991
907 n. 15 (Minn.1977) (where change in constitutional law affects criminal proceedings); *109 (change in law of sovereign immunity).
Schaeffer v. State 444 N.W.2d 876 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Schaeffer v. State 444 N.W.2d 876 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
The state claims that the original installation of the guardrail was an “event occurring” prior to August 1, 1976, and that liability cannot be premised upon this “event.” Common law sovereign immunity was abolished by the supreme court in Nieting v. Blondell, 306 Minn. 122
Wornson v. Chrysler Corp. 436 N.W.2d 472 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Wornson v. Chrysler Corp. 436 N.W.2d 472 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
*474 Sovereign immunity with respect to tort claims was prospectively abolished in Nieting v. Blondell, 306 Minn. 122
Lienhard v. State 431 N.W.2d 861 Minn. 1988
Lienhard v. State 431 N.W.2d 861 Minn. 1988
Governmental immunity for tort was abolished, plaintiff argues, because it was “an anachronism, without rational basis, and has existed only by the force of inertia.” Nieting v. Blondell, 306 Minn. 122, 129 , (quoting Muskopf v. Coming Hospital District, 55 Cal.2d 211, 216 , 11 Cal.Rptr.
Forster v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. 423 N.W.2d 691 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Forster v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. 423 N.W.2d 691 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Nusbaum v. County of Blue Earth 422 N.W.2d 713 Minn. 1988
Nusbaum v. County of Blue Earth 422 N.W.2d 713 Minn. 1988
*718 In Nieting v. Blondell, 306 Minn. 122 , this court abolished the doctrine of sovereign immunity except as to “the exercise of discretionary functions or legislative, judicial, quasi-legislative, and quasi-judicial functions.” Id.
Lienhard v. State 417 N.W.2d 119 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Lienhard v. State 417 N.W.2d 119 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Sovereign immunity in tort was abolished by the Minnesota Supreme Court in Nieting v. Blondell, 306 Minn. 122, 132
Andrade v. Ellefson 391 N.W.2d 836 Minn. 1986
Lyons v. State Ex Rel. Humphrey Ex Rel. Pung 366 N.W.2d 621 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Lyons v. State Ex Rel. Humphrey Ex Rel. Pung 366 N.W.2d 621 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
See Nieting v. Blondell, 306 Minn. 122
Cook v. Connolly 353 N.W.2d 184 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Glassman v. Miller 356 N.W.2d 655 Minn. 1984
Ostendorf v. Kenyon 347 N.W.2d 834 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Ostendorf v. Kenyon 347 N.W.2d 834 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Nieting v. Blondell, 306 Minn. 122
Green-Glo Turf Farms, Inc. v. State 347 N.W.2d 491 Minn. 1984
Naylor v. Minnesota Daily 342 N.W.2d 632 Minn. 1984
Naylor v. Minnesota Daily 342 N.W.2d 632 Minn. 1984
Nieting v. Blondell, 306 Minn. 122
American Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. Ryan 330 N.W.2d 113 Minn. 1983
American Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. Ryan 330 N.W.2d 113 Minn. 1983
See, e.g., Nieting v. Blondell, 306 Minn. 122, 131-32 , see also Note, The Retroactivity of Minnesota Supreme Court Personal Injury Decisions, 6 Wm.
Thompson v. Estate of Petroff 319 N.W.2d 400 Minn. 1982
Thompson v. Estate of Petroff 319 N.W.2d 400 Minn. 1982
Although we generally have applied decisions that abolish a tort immunity prospectively, see, e.g., Nieting v. Blondell, 306 Minn. 122, 132 , Beaudette v. Frana, 285 Minn. 366, 373 , Silesky v. Kelman, 281 Minn. 431, 443 , we believe that in this case the most equitable result will be achieved by applying the new rule retroactively.
Hage v. Stade 304 N.W.2d 283 Minn. 1981
Hage v. Stade 304 N.W.2d 283 Minn. 1981
§ 3.736 (1978), in response to our decision in Nieting v. Blondeil, 306 Minn. 122 , the distinction between public duties and special duties is still valid.
Anderson Ex Rel. Anderson v. Stream 295 N.W.2d 595 Minn. 1980
Anderson Ex Rel. Anderson v. City of Minneapolis 296 N.W.2d 383 Minn. 1980
Anderson Ex Rel. Anderson v. City of Minneapolis 296 N.W.2d 383 Minn. 1980
Therefore, the causes of action arising from these accidents are unaffected by our decision in Nieting v. Blondell, 306 Minn. 122 , in which we prospectively abolished common law governmental immunity with regard to tort claims against the State of Minnesota arising after August 1, 1976.
Anderson Ex Rel. Anderson v. Stream 295 N.W.2d 595 Minn. 1980
See, Nieting v. Blondell, 306 Minn. 122 , Minn.Const.
Record v. Metropolitan Transit Commission 284 N.W.2d 542 Minn. 1979
Record v. Metropolitan Transit Commission 284 N.W.2d 542 Minn. 1979
See, Nieting v. Blondell, 306 Minn. 122 , Spanel v. Mounds View School Dist.
Rum River Lumber Co. v. State 282 N.W.2d 882 Minn. 1979
Stein v. Regents of the University of Minnesota 282 N.W.2d 552 Minn. 1979
Stein v. Regents of the University of Minnesota 282 N.W.2d 552 Minn. 1979
August 1, 1976, is the effective date of this court’s abrogation of the doctrine of governmental immunity as applied to the State of Minnesota in Nieting v. Blondell, 306 Minn. 122
Rum River Lumber Co. v. State 282 N.W.2d 882 Minn. 1979
The fire occurred on February 28, 1973, prior to the abolition of sovereign immunity in Nieting v. Blondell, 306 Minn. 122
Harrington v. County of Ramsey 279 N.W.2d 791 Minn. 1979
Harrington v. County of Ramsey 279 N.W.2d 791 Minn. 1979
The cause of action in this case arose prior to August 1, 1976, the date from which sovereign immunity was abolished by Nieting v. Blondell, 306 Minn. 122
Papenhausen v. Schoen 268 N.W.2d 565 Minn. 1978
Papenhausen v. Schoen 268 N.W.2d 565 Minn. 1978
While we abolished the sovereign immunity doctrine in Nieting v. Blondell, 306 Minn. 122 , the events giving rise to this litigation occurred on May 25, 1976, before the Nieting decision became effective.