Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Swanson, 240 N.W.2d 822.

29 citing documents.

Luke Joshua Cain, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
d 822, 824-25 (Minn. 1976).
Distinguished State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
See, (affirming conviction where defendant consciously shot victim without intent to kill); (affirming conviction where defendant consciously used knife against decedent) .
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
See State v. Swanson, 307 Minn. 412, 422, (holding that the erro r of admitting “irrelevant and possibly harmful” evidence about unrelated criminal conduct was nonprejudicial because of the cautionary instruction).
State v. Gatson 801 N.W.2d 134 Minn. 2011
State v. Gatson 801 N.W.2d 134 Minn. 2011
State v. Swanson, 307 Minn. 412, 422 , (“[Carefully worded instructions by the trial court can ameliorate the effect of improper pros-ecutorial argument.”)
State v. Back 775 N.W.2d 866 Minn. 2009
State v. Back 775 N.W.2d 866 Minn. 2009
See, e.g., Frost, d at 318-20 (holding the evidence was sufficient to sustain the second-degree manslaughter conviction of a wife who armed herself with a gun with the intent of scaring her abusive husband but accidentally killed him when the gun discharged during the course of their fight); State v. Swanson, 307 Minn. 412, 416-17 , (holding that the evidence supported a finding that defendant was guilty of second-degree manslaughter where the defendant pulled out his gun and fired at close rang
State v. Jurgens 424 N.W.2d 546 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
State v. Jurgens 424 N.W.2d 546 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
See State v. Swanson, 307 Minn. 412 , (pointing a gun at another and firing, where death was not intended).
State v. Turner 359 N.W.2d 22 Minn. 1984
State v. Turner 359 N.W.2d 22 Minn. 1984
and State v. Swanson, 307 Minn. 412 , (affirming convictions notwithstanding the improper elicitation of such evidence).
State v. Edwards 343 N.W.2d 269 Minn. 1984
State v. Edwards 343 N.W.2d 269 Minn. 1984
(ii) Murder cases in which we have considered the issue of submission of second-degree culpably-negligent manslaughter include, in chronological order, State v. Leinweber, 303 Minn. 414 , State v. Swanson, 307 Minn. 412 , State v. Malzac, 309 Minn. 300
State v. Bland 337 N.W.2d 378 Minn. 1983
State v. Bland 337 N.W.2d 378 Minn. 1983
In State v. Swanson, 307 Minn. 412 , on the other hand, we held that a similar error was nonprejudicial, particularly in view of the trial court’s cautionary instructions.
Hauwiller v. State 295 N.W.2d 641 Minn. 1980
Hauwiller v. State 295 N.W.2d 641 Minn. 1980
See State v. Swanson, 307 Minn. 412 , and State v. Spann, 289 Minn. 497
Wolfe v. State 293 N.W.2d 41 Minn. 1980
Wolfe v. State 293 N.W.2d 41 Minn. 1980
Compare State v. Swanson, 307 Minn. 412 , with State v. Malzac, 309 Minn. 300
State v. Underwood 281 N.W.2d 337 Minn. 1979
State v. Underwood 281 N.W.2d 337 Minn. 1979
In State v. Swanson, 307 Minn. 412 , a ease factually similar to the one presently before us, we held that the prosecutor’s inquiry was error but, because of the trial court’s ruling and cautionary instruction, not reversible error.
In Re the Welfare of S. W. T. 277 N.W.2d 507 Minn. 1979
In Re the Welfare of S. W. T. 277 N.W.2d 507 Minn. 1979
State v. Swanson, 307 Minn. 412 , State v. Spann, 289 Minn. 497 , State v. Johnson, 277 Minn. 368
State v. Organ 263 N.W.2d 627 Minn. 1978
State v. Organ 263 N.W.2d 627 Minn. 1978
See, State v. Swanson, 307 Minn. 412 , State v. Hyleck, 286 Minn. 126 , , certiorari denied, 399 U.S. 932 , 90 S.Ct.
State v. Martin 256 N.W.2d 85 Minn. 1977
State v. Martin 256 N.W.2d 85 Minn. 1977
State v. Malzac 244 N.W.2d 258 Minn. 1976
State v. Malzac 244 N.W.2d 258 Minn. 1976
Neither State v. Swanson, 307 Minn. 412 , nor People v. Jones, 395 Mich.