Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Scott v. Photo Center, Inc., 235 N.W.2d 616.

29 citing documents.

Daniel Larson, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
E.g., Scott v. Photo Ctr., Inc., d 616, 617 (1975).
Ann R. Majerus, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Specifically , she relies on Thao v. Command Ctr., Inc. , Sunstar Foods Inc. v. Uhlendorf , ; Scott v. Photo Ctr., Inc., 306 Minn. 535, and Haugen v. Superior Dev., Inc., .
John L. Corrigan, Relator v. North Metro Harness Initiative, LLC, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2015
John L. Corrigan, Relator v. North Metro Harness Initiative, LLC, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Generally, “a substantial pay reduction gives an employee good cause for quitting.” Scott v. Photo Ctr., Inc., 306 Minn. 535, 536, Haugen v. Superior Dev., Inc., (noting that 6 “caselaw consistently establishes that a substantial wage or hours reduction is good reason to quit”).
Thao v. Command Center, Inc. 824 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Thao v. Command Center, Inc. 824 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Generally, “a substantial pay reduction gives an employee good cause for quitting.” Scott v. Photo Ctr., Inc., 306 Minn. 535, 536 , Haugen v. Superior Dev., Inc., (holding that “caselaw consistently establishes that a substantial wage or hours reduction is good reason to quit”); (holding that “wage cuts of 21-26
Haugen v. Superior Development, Inc. 819 N.W.2d 715 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Haugen v. Superior Development, Inc. 819 N.W.2d 715 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Wood v. Menard, Inc., Danielson Mobil, see also Scott v. The Photo Ctr., Inc., 306 Minn. 535, 535-36 , -17 (1975) (holding that a 25-percent wage reduction constituted good reason to quit employment).
Cook v. Playworks 541 N.W.2d 366 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Cook v. Playworks 541 N.W.2d 366 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
1 Scott v. Photo Ctr., Inc., 306 Minn. *369 535, 536 , (25 percent reduction in wages resulting from switch to commission from fixed salary established good cause for quitting); (30 percent reduction in pay resulting from change to hourly pay rate from monthly salary established good cause for quitting)
Dachel v. Ortho Met, Inc. 528 N.W.2d 268 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Dachel v. Ortho Met, Inc. 528 N.W.2d 268 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Scott v. The Photo Ctr., Inc., 306 Minn. 535, 536
Miller v. International Express Corp. 495 N.W.2d 616 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Miller v. International Express Corp. 495 N.W.2d 616 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
See Scott v. The Photo Ctr., Inc., 306 Minn. 535, 536
Wood v. Menard, Inc. 490 N.W.2d 441 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Wood v. Menard, Inc. 490 N.W.2d 441 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
See Sunstar Foods, Inc. v. Uhlendorf (20-25% pay reduction was substantial, but less than 15% was not sufficient to show good cause); Scott v. The Photo Center, Inc., 306 Minn. 535, 536 , -17 (1975) (change in pay from a fixed salary to a commission, resulting in a 25% pay reduction was substantial); (unilateral 30% pay reduction was substantial).
Simonson v. Thin Film Technology Corp. 392 N.W.2d 363 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Simonson v. Thin Film Technology Corp. 392 N.W.2d 363 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
See Scott v. The Photo Center, Inc., 306 Minn. 535 , (25 percent reduction in wages); (unilateral 30 percent pay reduction); (change of policy forcing reassignment with reduced grade and wages).
Moore v. Allied Aviation Fueling Co. of Minnesota 385 N.W.2d 41 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Moore v. Allied Aviation Fueling Co. of Minnesota 385 N.W.2d 41 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
See, e.g., Scott v. The Photo Center, Inc., 306 Minn. 535 , Helmin v. Griswold Ribbon & Typewriter, -61 (Minn.Ct.App.1984).
Burke v. Dorso Trailer Sales, Inc. 382 N.W.2d 570 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Foy v. J.E.K. Industries 352 N.W.2d 123 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Foy v. J.E.K. Industries 352 N.W.2d 123 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Sunstar Foods, Inc. v. Uhlendorf Scott v. The Photo Center, 306 Minn. 535
Rutten v. Rockie International, Inc. 349 N.W.2d 334 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Rutten v. Rockie International, Inc. 349 N.W.2d 334 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Scott v. The Photo Center, Inc., 306 Minn. 535
Sunstar Foods, Inc. v. Uhlendorf 310 N.W.2d 80 Minn. 1981
Sunstar Foods, Inc. v. Uhlendorf 310 N.W.2d 80 Minn. 1981
Scott v. The Photo Center, Inc., 306 Minn. 535, 536 , -17 (1975) (citations omitted).
Hanson v. I. D. S. Properties Management Co. 242 N.W.2d 833 Minn. 1976
Hanson v. I. D. S. Properties Management Co. 242 N.W.2d 833 Minn. 1976
A substantial wage reduction can constitute “good cause.” Scott v. The Photo Center, Inc. 306 Minn. 535