DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Hoaglund, 240 N.W.2d 4.

65 citing documents.

  • State v. Melina 295 N.W.2d 644 Minn. 1980
    State v. Hoaglund, 307 Minn. 322 , State v. Russell, 306 Minn. 274
  • State v. Milton 295 N.W.2d 94 Minn. 1980
  • State v. Milton 295 N.W.2d 94 Minn. 1980
    State v. Hoaglund, 307 Minn. 322
  • Kochevar v. State 281 N.W.2d 680 Minn. 1979
  • Kochevar v. State 281 N.W.2d 680 Minn. 1979
    State v. Hoaglund, 307 Minn. 322
  • State v. Genereux 272 N.W.2d 33 Minn. 1978
  • State v. Genereux 272 N.W.2d 33 Minn. 1978
    State v. Hoaglund, 307 Minn. 322
  • State v. Neumann 262 N.W.2d 426 Minn. 1978
  • State v. Neumann 262 N.W.2d 426 Minn. 1978
    State v. Taylor, 288 Minn. 37 , State v. Johnson, 279 Minn. 209 , cf. State v. Hoaglund, 307 Minn. 322 , see, generally, 5A Dunnell, Dig.
  • State v. Goulette 258 N.W.2d 758 Minn. 1977
  • State v. Goulette 258 N.W.2d 758 Minn. 1977
    See, State v. Hoaglund, 307 Minn. 322
  • State v. Nelson 250 N.W.2d 816 Minn. 1976
  • State v. Nelson 250 N.W.2d 816 Minn. 1976
    Recently, in State v. Hoaglund, 307 Minn. 322 , we emphasized strongly that the trial court has the primary responsibility to elicit from a defendant the testimony needed to establish a proper plea.
  • State v. Nace 241 N.W.2d 101 Minn. 1976
  • State v. Nace 241 N.W.2d 101 Minn. 1976
    We agree that the trial court has the primary responsibility for eliciting from defendant the testimony needed to establish a factual basis, see, State v. Hoaglund, 307 Minn. 322 , and also that the questions should be designed to get the defendant to say in his own words exactly what happened.