Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Meinke v. Lewandowski, 237 N.W.2d 387.

26 citing documents.

Anderson v. Indep. Sch. Dist. 696 924 N.W.2d 911 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Anderson v. Indep. Sch. Dist. 696 924 N.W.2d 911 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Meinke v. Lewandowski , 306 Minn. 406 , , 392 (1975).
Randall Norman v. Crow Wing Cooperative Power & Light Company Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Randall Norman v. Crow Wing Cooperative Power & Light Company Minn. Ct. App. 2016
See Meinke v. Lewandowski, 306 Minn. 406, 410, (noting “extremely difficult position” of district court after wording of special verdict led to inconsistent verdict).
Poppler v. Wright Hennepin Cooperative Electric Ass'n 845 N.W.2d 168 Minn. 2014
Poppler v. Wright Hennepin Cooperative Electric Ass'n 845 N.W.2d 168 Minn. 2014
See, e.g., Automated Sys., d at 753 (recognizing district court power to interpret a jury’s findings if a fact is implied by the jury’s answers); Meinke v. Lewandowski, 306 Minn. 406, 412 , -92 (1975) (recognizing district court has inherent power to harmonize a jury’s findings if the jury’s answers are inconsistent).
Daly v. McFarland 812 N.W.2d 113 Minn. 2012
Daly v. McFarland 812 N.W.2d 113 Minn. 2012
Typically, district courts facing a potentially inconsistent verdict have two options in construing the form: (1) “exercising their own powers of interpretation”; or (2) “in effect partially directing a verdict, where it is deemed that a jury’s response must be changed as a matter of law.” Meinke v. Lewandowski, 306 Minn. 406, 412 , -92 (1975).
Olson v. Alexandria Independent School District 206 680 N.W.2d 583 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Olson v. Alexandria Independent School District 206 680 N.W.2d 583 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
See Meinke v. Lewandowski, 306 Minn. 406
Musicland Group, Inc. v. Ceridian Corp. 508 N.W.2d 524 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Musicland Group, Inc. v. Ceridian Corp. 508 N.W.2d 524 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
(citing Meinke v. Lewandowski, 306 Minn. 406, 412 , ).
Bartosch v. Lewison 413 N.W.2d 530 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Bartosch v. Lewison 413 N.W.2d 530 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
See Meinke v. Lewandowski, 306 Minn. 406, 412
Bogut v. Jannetta 410 N.W.2d 451 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Bogut v. Jannetta 410 N.W.2d 451 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
See, e.g., Meinke v. Lewandowski, 306 Minn. 406 , (jury’s finding that the negligence of plaintiff and one *454 defendant were not the cause of plaintiffs damages was inconsistent with jury’s apportionment of damages to those parties); Dubbe v. A.O.
Stewart v. Frisch 381 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Stewart v. Frisch 381 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Appellant relies on Meinke v. Lewandowski, 306 Minn. 406
Haugen v. International Transport, Inc. 364 N.W.2d 484 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Haugen v. International Transport, Inc. 364 N.W.2d 484 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In Meinke v. Lewandowski, 306 Minn. 406 , the court said: Although Rule 49.01, Rules of Civil Procedure, does not specify the procedure to be followed by a trial judge when a jury returns inconsistent answers to a special verdict, a substantial body of case law in Minnesota and other jurisdictions defines the alternative courses availa
Kukowski v. Wm. Miller Scrap Iron & Metal Co. 353 N.W.2d 638 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Kukowski v. Wm. Miller Scrap Iron & Metal Co. 353 N.W.2d 638 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Meinke v. Lewandowski, 306 Minn. 406 , 413 n. 5, , 392 n. 5 (1975).
Carufel v. Steven 293 N.W.2d 47 Minn. 1980
Carufel v. Steven 293 N.W.2d 47 Minn. 1980
Cf. Meinke v. Lewandowski, 306 Minn. 406
Walsh v. Pagra Air Taxi, Inc. 282 N.W.2d 567 Minn. 1979
Walsh v. Pagra Air Taxi, Inc. 282 N.W.2d 567 Minn. 1979
Meinke v. Lewandowski, 306 Minn. 406, 412 , Orwick v. Belshan, 304 Minn. 338