Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Bituminous Casualty Corp. v. Bartlett, 240 N.W.2d 310.

75 citing documents.

Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Bloomington Steel & Supply Co. 695 N.W.2d 408 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Bloomington Steel & Supply Co. 695 N.W.2d 408 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Corp. v. Bartlett, 307 Minn. 72, 77-79 , *411 -14 (1976); Ohio Cas.
American Family Insurance Co. v. Walser 628 N.W.2d 605 Minn. 2001
American Family Insurance Co. v. Walser 628 N.W.2d 605 Minn. 2001
In 1976, when considering the Hauen-stein definition of accident, we noted that “this definition or a similar one is universally accepted by the courts * * Bituminous Cos. Corp. v. Bartlett, 307 Minn. 72 , 80 n. 5, n. 5 .
Franklin v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co. 574 N.W.2d 405 Minn. 1998
Franklin v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co. 574 N.W.2d 405 Minn. 1998
We are persuaded that the rationale of Bituminous Casualty Corp. v. Bartlett, 307 Minn. 72 , controls the outcome in the present case: [An] insurer is in the business of distributing losses due to such property damage among a large number of policyholders.
Domtar, Inc. v. Niagara Fire Insurance Co. 563 N.W.2d 724 Minn. 1997
Domtar, Inc. v. Niagara Fire Insurance Co. 563 N.W.2d 724 Minn. 1997
Corp. v. Bartlett, 307 Minn. 72, 77-79 , -14 (1976).
Sentinel Management Co. v. New Hampshire Insurance Co. 563 N.W.2d 296 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Sentinel Management Co. v. New Hampshire Insurance Co. 563 N.W.2d 296 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Corp. v. Bartlett, 307 Minn. 72 , 78 n. 8, , 313 n. 8 (1976) (citation omitted); Domtar, Inc. v. Niagara Fire Ins.
Meadowbrook, Inc. v. Tower Insurance Co. 559 N.W.2d 411 Minn. 1997
Meadowbrook, Inc. v. Tower Insurance Co. 559 N.W.2d 411 Minn. 1997
Corp. v. Bartlett, 307 Minn. 72, 75 , ).
Domtar, Inc. v. Niagara Fire Insurance Co. 552 N.W.2d 738 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Domtar, Inc. v. Niagara Fire Insurance Co. 552 N.W.2d 738 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Corp. v. Bartlett, 307 Minn. 72 , 78 n. 8, , 313 n. 8 (1976) (citing Herbert S. Denenberg, et.
Fluoroware, Inc. v. Chubb Group of Insurance Companies 545 N.W.2d 678 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Fluoroware, Inc. v. Chubb Group of Insurance Companies 545 N.W.2d 678 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Bituminous Casualty Corp. v. Bartlett, 307 Minn. 72, 75 , overruled in part on other grounds by Prahm v. Rupp Constr.
Rohrer v. Rick 529 N.W.2d 406 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Rohrer v. Rick 529 N.W.2d 406 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Cf. Bituminous Casualty Corp. v. Bartlett, 307 Minn. 72 , 77 n. 5, , 313 n. 5 (1976) (term "accident" may include negligent acts of insured), overruled on other grounds, Prahm v. Rupp Constr.
Independent School District No. 197 v. Accident & Casualty Insurance of Winterthur 525 N.W.2d 600 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Independent School District No. 197 v. Accident & Casualty Insurance of Winterthur 525 N.W.2d 600 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Bituminous Casualty Corp. v. Bartlett, 307 Minn. 72, 77
Board of Regents v. Royal Insurance Co. of America 517 N.W.2d 888 Minn. 1994
Board of Regents v. Royal Insurance Co. of America 517 N.W.2d 888 Minn. 1994
The word “sudden” is used in tandem with the word “accidental,” and “accidental” in liability insurance parlance means unexpected or unintended, Bituminous Casualty Corp. v. Bartlett, 307 Minn. 72, 76-77 , -13 (1976), overruled in part on other grounds, Prahm v. Rupp Constr.
Pedro Companies v. Sentry Insurance 518 N.W.2d 49 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Pedro Companies v. Sentry Insurance 518 N.W.2d 49 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Bituminous Casualty Corp. v. Bartlett, 307 Minn. 72, 75
Rw v. Tf 510 N.W.2d 231 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Rw v. Tf 510 N.W.2d 231 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Corp. v. Bartlett, 307 Minn. 72 , 77 n. 5, , 313 n. 5 (1976), overruled on other grounds, by, Prahm v. Rupp Constr.
Sphere Drake Insurance Co. v. Tremco, Inc. 513 N.W.2d 473 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Sphere Drake Insurance Co. v. Tremco, Inc. 513 N.W.2d 473 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Corp. v. Bartlett, 307 Minn. 72, 77 , overruled in part on other grounds
R.W. v. T.F. 510 N.W.2d 231 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
R.W. v. T.F. 510 N.W.2d 231 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Corp. v. Bartlett, 307 Minn. 72 , 77 n. 5, , 313 n. 5 (1976), overruled on other grounds, by, Prahm v. Rupp Constr.
Dornfeld v. Oberg 491 N.W.2d 297 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Dornfeld v. Oberg 491 N.W.2d 297 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Corp. v. Bartlett, 307 Minn. 72, 78 , (in general liability policy, either “intentional or reckless” acts viewed outside a covered “occurrence,” defined in the policy as an expected or intended accident), overruled on other grounds, Farmers Union Oil Co. v. Mutual
Milbank Insurance Co. v. B.L.G. 484 N.W.2d 52 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Milbank Insurance Co. v. B.L.G. 484 N.W.2d 52 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Mil-bank contends the Hauenstein definition means that, if an injury is “foreseeable,” it cannot be an “accident.” The application of the Hauen-stein definition to particular facts “has produced a quagmire of conflicting results and rationales.” Bituminous Casualty Corp. v. Bartlett, 307 Minn. 72, 77, n. 5 , , 313 n. 5 (1976), overruled on other grounds, Prahm v. Rupp Constr.
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. Briggs 464 N.W.2d 535 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. Briggs 464 N.W.2d 535 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Bituminous Casualty Corp. v. Bartlett, 307 Minn. 72, 78 , overruled on other grounds, Prahm v. Rupp Constr.
Magnetic Data, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. 430 N.W.2d 483 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Magnetic Data, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. 430 N.W.2d 483 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
This case is unlike Bituminous Casualty Corp. v. Bartlett, 307 Minn. 72 , overruled on other grounds, wherein a construction contractor knowing *487 ly used inferior brick and intentionally installed out-of-plumb walls “contrary to contract standards of workmanship,” and therefore should have expected any r
Farmers Union Oil Co. v. Mutual Service Insurance Co. 422 N.W.2d 530 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Farmers Union Oil Co. v. Mutual Service Insurance Co. 422 N.W.2d 530 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
The legal standard to apply in this case was introduced in Bituminous Casualty Corp. v. Bartlett, 307 Minn. 72 , overruled on other grounds
TWIN CITY FED. SAV. & LOAN v. Zimmerman 411 N.W.2d 294 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
TWIN CITY FED. SAV. & LOAN v. Zimmerman 411 N.W.2d 294 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Respondent cites Bituminous Casualty Corp. v. Bartlett, 307 Minn. 72 , in support of its argument that Minnesota law does not permit a party to insure his failure to perform under a contract absent an accident which prevents performance.
Gamble Skogmo, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. 390 N.W.2d 343 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Gamble Skogmo, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. 390 N.W.2d 343 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
(citing Bituminous Casualty Corp. v. Bartlett, 307 Minn. 72 , ).
Atlantic Mutual Insurance Co. v. Judd Co. 367 N.W.2d 604 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Atlantic Mutual Insurance Co. v. Judd Co. 367 N.W.2d 604 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Bituminous Casualty Corp. v. Bartlett, 307 Minn. 72
Federated Mutual Insurance Co. v. Concrete Units, Inc. 363 N.W.2d 751 Minn. 1985
Federated Mutual Insurance Co. v. Concrete Units, Inc. 363 N.W.2d 751 Minn. 1985
See Bituminous Casualty Corp. v. Bartlett, 307 Minn. 72, 77-79 , -14 (1976) (for a discussion of the term "accident” as used in liability insurance policies).
Transamerica Insurance Group v. Meere 694 P.2d 181 Ariz. 1984
Perl v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. 345 N.W.2d 209 Minn. 1984