Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Bonhiver v. Graff, 248 N.W.2d 291.

94 citing documents.

Han Zhong v. Nicholas Dudero, Stieg Strand Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Han Zhong v. Nicholas Dudero, Stieg Strand Minn. Ct. App. 2026
See Valspar Refinish, Inc. v. Gaylord’s, Inc., -99 (Minn. 1976).
Eugene and Sandra Alexander, et al., Plaintiffs, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Controlling Caselaw To determine whether Minnesota recognizes cross -jurisdictional class-action tolling, we examine three opinions: American Pipe, a United States Supreme Court opinion; a Minnesota Supreme Court opinion; and Bartlett, an opinion from this court.
Distinguished Michelin Properties LLC, Plaintiff, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Instead, to conclude an issue of material fact remains on whether Clean Care justifiably relied on the first report.
Kelly Michels, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
All-American Ice L.L.C., d/b/a All-American Arena Products, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
SRRT Properties, LP, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
If a person supplying the information “fails to exercise reasonable care or competence in obtaining or communicating the information,” he is “subject to liability for pecuniary loss.” Bonhiver v. Graff , (quoting Restatement (Second) of Torts § 552 (Tentative Draft No. 12, 1966)).
PET Enterprises and Motortech, Inc., et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Bonhiver v. Graff, 311 Minn. 111, 132
Hardin County Savings Bank v. Housing & Redevelopment Authority of the City of Brainerd 821 N.W.2d 184 Minn. 2012
Hardin County Savings Bank v. Housing & Redevelopment Authority of the City of Brainerd 821 N.W.2d 184 Minn. 2012
Judges Ass’n, Minnesota Practice — Jury Instruction Guides, Civil, CIV JIG 57.20 (5th ed.2006); see Bonhiver v. Graff, 311 Minn. 111, 121-22 , -99 (1976).
Williams v. Smith 820 N.W.2d 807 Minn. 2012
Williams v. Smith 820 N.W.2d 807 Minn. 2012
See Bonhiver v. Graff, 311 Minn. 111, 122 , (adopting Restatement (Second) of Torts § 552 (Tent.
City of Maple Grove v. Marketline Construction Capital, LLC 802 N.W.2d 809 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
City of Maple Grove v. Marketline Construction Capital, LLC 802 N.W.2d 809 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
See Specialized Tours, (stating that a required element of fraud is that a party relies on the fraudulent action); Bonhiver v. Graff, 311 Minn. 111, 122 , (identifying reliance as a required element of negligent misrepresentation); Deli v. Univ.
Valspar Refinish, Inc. v. Gaylord's, Inc. 764 N.W.2d 359 Minn. 2009
Valspar Refinish, Inc. v. Gaylord's, Inc. 764 N.W.2d 359 Minn. 2009
174 & n. 3 (Minn.1986); Bonhiver v. Graff, 311 Minn. 111, 121-22 , -99 (1976).
Christians v. Grant Thornton, LLP 733 N.W.2d 803 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Distinguished Christians v. Grant Thornton, LLP 733 N.W.2d 803 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
The trustee argues that Minnesota courts have already recognized deepening-insolvency damages in Bonhiver v. Graff, 311 Minn. Ill, 131
McIntosh County Bank v. Dorsey & Whitney, LLP 726 N.W.2d 108 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
McIntosh County Bank v. Dorsey & Whitney, LLP 726 N.W.2d 108 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
In Bonhiver v. Graff, 311 Minn. 111, 122 , the supreme court adopted the formulation of negligent misrepresentation described in the Restatement (Second) of Torts § 552 (1976), which provides: (1) One who, in the course of his .business, profession or employment, or in any other transaction in which he has a pecuniary interes
Greuling v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc. 690 N.W.2d 757 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Greuling v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc. 690 N.W.2d 757 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Noske v. Friedberg 670 N.W.2d 740 Minn. 2003
Noske v. Friedberg 670 N.W.2d 740 Minn. 2003
Herrmann, d at 643 ; see also Bonhiver v. Graff, 311 Minn. 111, 117 , Dalton v. Dow Chemical Co., 280 Minn. 147, 153
Hebrink v. Farm Bureau Life Insurance Co. 664 N.W.2d 414 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Hebrink v. Farm Bureau Life Insurance Co. 664 N.W.2d 414 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Restatement (Second) of Torts § 552(1) (1977); see Bonhiver v. Graff, 311 Minn. 111, 122 , -99 (1976) (adopting the restatement’s definition of negligent misrepresentation).
Broek v. Park Nicollet Health Services 660 N.W.2d 439 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Broek v. Park Nicollet Health Services 660 N.W.2d 439 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Id.; Bonhiver v. Graff, 311 Minn. 111, 117 , see also Minn. R. Civ.
Noske v. Friedberg 656 N.W.2d 409 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Noske v. Friedberg 656 N.W.2d 409 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Bonhiver v. Graff, 311 Minn. 111, 116-17
Dakota Bank v. Eiesland 645 N.W.2d 177 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Dakota Bank v. Eiesland 645 N.W.2d 177 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
With regard to negligent misrepresentations, Dakota relies on Bonhiver v. Graff, 311 Minn. 111 , *181 (1976), to argue that unaudited accounting records can be deemed representations by accountants.
Reinsurance Ass'n of Minnesota v. Timmer 641 N.W.2d 302 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Reinsurance Ass'n of Minnesota v. Timmer 641 N.W.2d 302 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
174 n. 3 (Minn.1986) (quoting Restatement (Second) of Torts § 552 (Tentative Draft No. 12, 1966)); Bonhiver v. Graff, 311 Minn. 111, 122
Citizens for a Safe Grant v. Lone Oak Sportsmen's Club, Inc. 624 N.W.2d 796 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Schroeder v. White 624 N.W.2d 810 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Schroeder v. White 624 N.W.2d 810 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Bonhiver v. Graff, 311 Minn. 111, 122 , -99 (1976) (quoting Restatement (Second) of Torts § 552); see also Smith v. Woodwind Homes, Inc., (“An essential element of negligent misrepresentation is that the alleged misrepresenter owes a duty of care to the person to whom they are providing informati
Citizens for a Safe Grant v. Lone Oak Sportsmen's Club, Inc. 624 N.W.2d 796 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
“A cause of action accrues when all of its elements exist to the extent that the claim could withstand a motion to dismiss.” Bonhiver v. Graff, 311 Minn. 111, 117
Noram Investment Services, Inc. v. Stirtz Bernards Boyden Surdel & Larter, P.A. 611 N.W.2d 372 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Noram Investment Services, Inc. v. Stirtz Bernards Boyden Surdel & Larter, P.A. 611 N.W.2d 372 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
1408, 1418 (D.Minn.1988); Bonhiver v. Graff, 311 Minn. 111, 122 , -99 (1976) (applying the Restatement (Second) rule as it then existed in draft form).
Witzman v. Lehrman, Lehrman & Flom 601 N.W.2d 179 Minn. 1999
Witzman v. Lehrman, Lehrman & Flom 601 N.W.2d 179 Minn. 1999
See L & H Airco, d at 379 (recognizing that attorneys can be held liable to nonclients for fraud); Bonhiver v. Graff, 311 Minn. 111, 123 , -99 (1976) (recognizing that accountants can be liable for misrepresentations to intended third party recipients whom the accountants know are relying on the representations).
Colangelo v. Norwest Mortgage, Inc. 598 N.W.2d 14 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Colangelo v. Norwest Mortgage, Inc. 598 N.W.2d 14 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
rofession or employment, or in a transaction in which he has a pecuniary interest, supplies false information for the guidance of others in their business transactions, is subject to liability for pecuniary loss caused to them by their justifiable reliance upon the information, if he fails to exercise reasonable care or competence in obtaining or communicating the information.” Bonhiver v. Graff, 311 Minn. 111, 122 , (citation omitted).
G.A.W. v. D.M.W. 596 N.W.2d 284 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Gaw v. Dmw 596 N.W.2d 284 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Gaw v. Dmw 596 N.W.2d 284 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Bonhiver v. Graff, 311 Minn. 111
G.A.W. v. D.M.W. 596 N.W.2d 284 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Bonhiver v. Graff, 311 Minn. 111
Herrmann v. McMenomy & Severson 590 N.W.2d 641 Minn. 1999
Herrmann v. McMenomy & Severson 590 N.W.2d 641 Minn. 1999
See Bonhiver v. Graff, 311 Minn. 111, 117 , (citation omitted) (statute of limitations begins when "damage is occasioned”); Dalton , 280 Minn, at 154, d at 584 ("Thus, the alleged negligence * * * coupled with the alleged resulting damage is the gravamen in deciding the date upon which the cause of action at law h