DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In re Clerk of Lyon County Courts' Compensation, 241 N.W.2d 781.

97 citing documents.

  • State v. Krotzer 548 N.W.2d 252 Minn. 1996
    Clerk of Court’s Compensation for Lyon County v. Lyon County Comm’rs, 308 Minn. 172, 180 , City of St.
  • Matter of Burns 542 N.W.2d 389 Minn. 1996
  • Matter of Burns 542 N.W.2d 389 Minn. 1996
    We add that while our decision in In Re Clerk of Lyon County, 308 Minn. 172 , deals with the necessity of a full adversarial hearing in the context of an adversarial proceeding, this matter involves neither such an adversarial proceeding nor a justiciable controversy.
  • Matter of Burns 538 N.W.2d 162 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
  • Matter of Burns 538 N.W.2d 162 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
    In re Clerk of Lyon Co. Courts’ Compensation, 308 Minn. 172, 180-82
  • Patton v. Newmar Corp. 538 N.W.2d 116 Minn. 1995
  • Patton v. Newmar Corp. 538 N.W.2d 116 Minn. 1995
    en have commented that courts are vested "with considerable inherent judicial authority necessary to their “vital function — the disposition of individual cases to deliver remedies for wrongs and ‘justice freely and without purchase; completely and without denial; promptly and without delay, conformable to the laws.’” See Clerk of Court’s Compensation for Lyon County v. Lyon County Commissioners, 308 Minn. 172, 177 , , 925 *119 (Minn.1979).
  • State v. Krotzer 531 N.W.2d 862 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
  • State v. Krotzer 531 N.W.2d 862 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
    In re Clerk of Court’s Compensation v. Lyon County Comm’rs, 308 Minn. 172, 177
  • Patton v. Newmar Corp. 520 N.W.2d 4 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
  • Patton v. Newmar Corp. 520 N.W.2d 4 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
    t the Minnesota Supreme Court has stated that the inherent judicial power of the state’s courts may be invoked to meet “the practical necessity of ensuring the free and full exercise of the court’s vital function — the disposition of individual cases to deliver remedies for wrongs and justice.” (citing In re Clerk of Lyon County Courts, 308 Minn. 172, 177 , ).
  • State Ex Rel. Archabal v. County of Hennepin 505 N.W.2d 294 Minn. 1993
  • State Ex Rel. Archabal v. County of Hennepin 505 N.W.2d 294 Minn. 1993
    Clerk of Court’s Compensation for Lyon County v. Lyon County Comm’rs, 308 Minn. 172, 180
  • Kronick v. Kronick 482 N.W.2d 533 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
  • Kronick v. Kronick 482 N.W.2d 533 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
    See In re Clerk of Lyon County Courts’ Compensation, 308 Minn. 172, 176-83 , -87 (1976) (discussing inherent judicial power).
  • Reesman v. State 449 N.W.2d 489 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
  • Reesman v. State 449 N.W.2d 489 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
    “Inherent judicial power governs that which is essential to the existence, dignity, and function of a court because it is a court.” In re Clerk of Lyon County Courts’ Compensation, 308 Minn. 172, 176
  • Collins v. Cochrane and Bresnahan, P.A. 415 N.W.2d 715 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • Collins v. Cochrane and Bresnahan, P.A. 415 N.W.2d 715 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
    See, e.g., Clerk of Court’s Compensation for Lyon County v. Lyon County Commissioners, 308 Minn. 172, 180-81
  • Blanding v. Sports & Health Club, Inc. 373 N.W.2d 784 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • In Re the Office of District Public Defender for the First Judicial District 373 N.W.2d 772 Minn. 1985
  • In Re the Office of District Public Defender for the First Judicial District 373 N.W.2d 772 Minn. 1985
    In Clerk of Court’s Compensation for Lyon County v. Lyon County Commissioners, 308 Minn. 172, 180-82, we set forth the principles that guide the exercise of inherent judicial power: (1) Inherent judicial power grows out of express and implied constitutional provisions *776 mandating a separation of powers and a viable judicial branch of government.
  • Neujahr v. Ramsey County Civil Service Commission 370 N.W.2d 446 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • Barlow v. Commissioner of Public Safety 365 N.W.2d 232 Minn. 1985
  • Barlow v. Commissioner of Public Safety 365 N.W.2d 232 Minn. 1985
    We have also recognized another aspect of the court’s inherent authority, namely, the “inherent authority of the courts to control the performance of judicial functions,” C.A., d at 358 , which involves that power “which is essential to the existence, dignity and function of a court because it is a court.” Id., quoting In re Clerk of Lyon County Court’s Compensation, 308 Minn. 172, 176
  • Minnesota Public Interest Research Group v. Northern States Power Co. 360 N.W.2d 654 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • Minnesota Public Interest Research Group v. Northern States Power Co. 360 N.W.2d 654 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    It is well settled that the words “by law” in this state’s constitution mean “by legislative enactment.” In re Clerk of Lyon County Courts’ Compensation, 308 Minn. 172, 174
  • Reinhold v. Board of Supervisors 677 P.2d 1335 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
  • Reinhold v. BD. OF SUP'RS OF NAVAJO CTY. 677 P.2d 1335 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
  • State v. Errington 310 N.W.2d 681 Minn. 1981
  • State v. Errington 310 N.W.2d 681 Minn. 1981
    The state impliedly concedes in its brief that the statute, if interpreted as requiring judges to perform the functions in question, violates the separation-of-powers doctrine, but the state argues that the challenged subsections can be saved if this court interprets the word “court” in those subsections as meaning “clerk of court” because it was settled in In re Clerk of Lyon County Courts, 308 Minn. 172, 173-74 , -83 (1976), that the legislature has shared power under the constitution to order
  • State v. C. A. 304 N.W.2d 353 Minn. 1981
  • State v. CA 304 N.W.2d 353 Minn. 1981
  • State v. CA 304 N.W.2d 353 Minn. 1981
    In re Clerk of Lyon County Courts' Compensation, 308 Minn. 172, 176, 180-81 , 786 (1976); In re Disbarment of Greathouse, 189 Minn. 51, 55 , 248 N.W.
  • State v. C. A. 304 N.W.2d 353 Minn. 1981
    In re Clerk of Lyon County Courts’ Compensation, 308 Minn. 172, 176, 180-81 , 786 (1976); In re Disbarment of Greathouse, 189 Minn. 51, 55 , 248 N.W.
  • County of Ramsey v. Stevens 283 N.W.2d 918 Minn. 1979
  • County of Ramsey v. Stevens 283 N.W.2d 918 Minn. 1979
    We have said that inherent judicial power may be invoked to meet “the practical necessity of ensuring the free and full exercise of the court’s vital function— the disposition of individual cases to deliver remedies for wrongs and ‘justice freely and without purchase; completely and without denial; promptly and without delay, conformable to the laws.’ ” In re Clerk of Lyon County Courts, 308 Minn. 172,177
  • City of Richfield v. Local No. 1215, International Ass'n of Fire Fighters 276 N.W.2d 42 Minn. 1979
  • City of Richfield v. Local No. 1215, International Ass'n of Fire Fighters 276 N.W.2d 42 Minn. 1979
    Indeed, “[i]nherent judicial power may not be asserted unless * * * reasonable legislative-administrative procedures are first exhausted.” In re Clerk of Lyon County Courts’ Compensation, 308 Minn. 172, 181
  • State v. Osterloh 275 N.W.2d 578 Minn. 1978
  • State v. Osterloh 275 N.W.2d 578 Minn. 1978
    In the case of In re Clerk of Court's Compensation for Lyon County, 308 Minn. 172, 180-181 , this court set forth five principles governing the application of inherent power.
  • In re County of Beltrami Probation Officer 249 N.W.2d 178 Minn. 1976
  • STATE DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETY v. Ogg 246 N.W.2d 560 Minn. 1976
  • STATE DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETY v. Ogg 246 N.W.2d 560 Minn. 1976
    11 See, In re Clerk of Lyon County Courts, 308 Minn. 172
  • Clerk of Court's Comp. for LC v. LC Com'rs 241 N.W.2d 781 Minn. 1976
  • Busse v. BOARD OF COUNTY COM'RS, SIBLEY 241 N.W.2d 794 Minn. 1976
  • Busse v. BOARD OF COUNTY COM'RS, SIBLEY 241 N.W.2d 794 Minn. 1976
    7, was considered in this court’s opinion in In re Clerk of Lyon County Courts, 308 Minn. 172