DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. McKinley, 232 N.W.2d 906.

97 citing documents.

  • Doheny v. Commissioner of Public Safety 368 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    1868 [ 20 L.Ed.2d 889 ] [1968], and State v. McKinley, 305 Minn. 297 , [1975].
  • State v. L'ITALIEN 355 N.W.2d 709 Minn. 1984
  • State v. L'ITALIEN 355 N.W.2d 709 Minn. 1984
    1391 , 59 L.Ed.2d 660 (1979); State v. McKinley, 305 Minn. 297
  • State v. Faber 343 N.W.2d 659 Minn. 1984
  • State v. Faber 343 N.W.2d 659 Minn. 1984
    State v. McKinley, 305 Minn. 297
  • State v. Menard 341 N.W.2d 888 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
  • State v. Menard 341 N.W.2d 888 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
    See People v. Ingle, 36 N.Y.2d 413, 420 , 369 N.Y.S.2d 67, 74 , 330 N.E.2d 39, 44 (1975), cited with approval in State v. Johnson, supra, and State v. McKinley, 305 Minn. 297
  • State v. Schinzing 342 N.W.2d 105 Minn. 1983
  • State v. Schinzing 342 N.W.2d 105 Minn. 1983
    and State v. McKinley, 305 Minn. 297
  • State v. Sanders 339 N.W.2d 557 Minn. 1983
  • State v. Sanders 339 N.W.2d 557 Minn. 1983
    1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968); State v. McKinley, 305 Minn. 297
  • State v. Mallory 337 N.W.2d 391 Minn. 1983
  • State v. Mallory 337 N.W.2d 391 Minn. 1983
    1391 , 59 L.Ed.2d 660 (1979); State v. McKinley, 305 Minn. 297
  • State v. Kvam 336 N.W.2d 525 Minn. 1983
  • State v. Kvam 336 N.W.2d 525 Minn. 1983
    1391 , 59 L.Ed.2d 660 (1979); State v. McKinley, 305 Minn. 297
  • State v. Smith 331 N.W.2d 234 Minn. 1983
  • State v. Smith 331 N.W.2d 234 Minn. 1983
    In State v. McKinley, 305 Minn. 297 , which is the leading Minnesota case on stopping motor vehicles, we held that a motor vehicle stop must be based on specific and articulable facts which, taken together with rational inferences therefrom, provide an objective reasonable basis for the stop.
  • State v. Pleas 329 N.W.2d 329 Minn. 1983
  • State v. Pleas 329 N.W.2d 329 Minn. 1983
    In doing so, we quoted from State v. McKinley, 305 Minn. 297 , which is the leading Minnesota ease on stopping motor vehicles, and then we stated: Here the plates were affixed to the vehicle in an unusual, although apparently legal, way.
  • State v. Alesso 328 N.W.2d 685 Minn. 1982
  • State v. Alesso 328 N.W.2d 685 Minn. 1982
    State v. McKinley, 305 Minn. 297
  • State v. Duesterhoeft 311 N.W.2d 866 Minn. 1981
  • State v. Duesterhoeft 311 N.W.2d 866 Minn. 1981
    1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968)], and applied to automobile stops by this court in State v. McKinley, 305 Minn. 297
  • State v. Gilchrist 299 N.W.2d 913 Minn. 1980
  • State v. Gilchrist 299 N.W.2d 913 Minn. 1980
    2637 , 61 L.Ed.2d 357 (1979); State v. McKinley, 305 Minn. 297 , City of St.
  • State v. Cavegn 294 N.W.2d 717 Minn. 1980
  • State v. Cavegn 294 N.W.2d 717 Minn. 1980
    Accord, e. g., State v. McKinley, 305 Minn. 297 , City of St.
  • Marben v. State, Department of Public Safety 294 N.W.2d 697 Minn. 1980
  • Marben v. State, Department of Public Safety 294 N.W.2d 697 Minn. 1980
    1391 , 59 L.Ed.2d 660 (1979); State v. McKinley, 305 Minn. 297
  • State v. Engholm 290 N.W.2d 780 Minn. 1980
  • State v. Engholm 290 N.W.2d 780 Minn. 1980
    This passage was also quoted with approval in State v. McKinley, 305 Minn. 297
  • State v. Ferraro 290 N.W.2d 177 Minn. 1980
  • State v. Ferraro 290 N.W.2d 177 Minn. 1980
    State v. McKinley, 305 Minn. 297
  • State v. Richards 284 N.W.2d 549 Minn. 1979
  • State v. Richards 284 N.W.2d 549 Minn. 1979
    1391 , 59 L.Ed.2d 660 (1979), and State v. McKinley, 305 Minn. 297 , (b) upon doing this and before they ever actually entered the vehicle one of the officers saw through the window and in open view a partially uncased gun; 2 (c) this observation provided them with all they needed in the way of probable cause; and (d) under the motor vehicle exception they at that point clearly
  • State v. Gallagher 275 N.W.2d 803 Minn. 1979
  • State v. Ferrise 269 N.W.2d 888 Minn. 1978
  • State v. Hodgman 257 N.W.2d 313 Minn. 1977
  • State v. Johnson 257 N.W.2d 308 Minn. 1977
  • State v. Hodgman 257 N.W.2d 313 Minn. 1977
    1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968); State v. *315 McKinley, 305 Minn. 297
  • State v. Johnson 257 N.W.2d 308 Minn. 1977
    In State v. McKinley, 305 Minn. 297 , this court held that single nonsystematic stops for routine driver’s license checks required as justification some specific and articulable suspicion by police of a violation.
  • State v. Dillon 242 N.W.2d 84 Minn. 1976
  • State v. Dillon 242 N.W.2d 84 Minn. 1976
    See, Terry v. Ohio, 392 U. S. 1 , 88 S. Ct 1868 , 20 L. ed. 2d 889 (1968); State v. McKinley, 305 Minn. 297
  • State v. Barber 241 N.W.2d 476 Minn. 1976
  • State v. Barber 241 N.W.2d 476 Minn. 1976
    *206 In affirming the conviction and upholding the trial court’s ruling that the stop was legal, we rely on our recent decision in State v. McKinley, 305 Minn. 297 , decided after the lower court’s decision in this case.
  • City of St. Paul v. Vaughn 237 N.W.2d 365 Minn. 1975
  • City of St. Paul v. Vaughn 237 N.W.2d 365 Minn. 1975
    Given those periods of suspension or revocation, and absent any knowledge on the part of Officers Zajac and Patsy that Vaughn’s license had been reinstated, 6 the stop here is not unreasonable under the standard set forth in Terry v. Ohio, supra, and applied to automobile stops by this court in State v. McKinley, 305 Minn. 297