DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Price v. Sheppard, 239 N.W.2d 905.

75 citing documents.

  • Matter of Rice 410 N.W.2d 907 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
    See Price v. Sheppard, 307 Minn. 250 , pet.
  • Jarvis v. Levine 403 N.W.2d 298 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • Jarvis v. Levine 403 N.W.2d 298 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
    In Price v. Sheppard, 307 Minn. 250 , a minor involuntarily committed to a state hospital was given a series of electroshock treatments against the express wishes of the minor’s guardian.
  • Hall v. Hall 408 N.W.2d 626 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • Matter of Danielson 398 N.W.2d 32 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • Matter of Danielson 398 N.W.2d 32 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
    Commitment, 8, Comment C. Treating facilities are authorized to determine when “the use of mild tranquilizers or those therapies requiring the cooperation of the patient” is appropriate, but the hospital must seek an adversary hearing before the trial court to obtain permission to administer “electroshock treatments, one of the most intrusive forms of treatment.” Price v. Sheppard, 307 Minn. 250, 260-63 , -13 (1976).
  • Matter of Smith 392 N.W.2d 582 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • Matter of Smith 392 N.W.2d 582 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
    On appeal, Smith argues for the first time that prior court authorization was required pursuant to Price v. Sheppard, 307 Minn. 250
  • In Re Guardianship of Kowalski 382 N.W.2d 861 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • In Re Guardianship of Kowalski 382 N.W.2d 861 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
    Price v. Sheppard, 307 Minn. 250, 257 , (footnote omitted).
  • Matter of Alleged Mental Illness of Kinzer 375 N.W.2d 526 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • Matter of Alleged Mental Illness of Kinzer 375 N.W.2d 526 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    This authorization was issued following a hearing pursuant to Price v. Sheppard, 307 Minn. 250
  • Nyflot v. Commissioner of Public Safety 369 N.W.2d 512 Minn. 1985
  • In Re Moll 347 N.W.2d 67 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
  • In Re Moll 347 N.W.2d 67 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
    uthorized, in the event that Respondent refuses such medication, inasmuch as the Court is convinced that Respondent’s mental condition requires the administration of such medications, and that his welfare is best served by provision for this treatment upon the recommendation of the medical staff.” The trial court’s order authorizing medication was apparently made in response to Price v. Sheppard, 307 Minn. 250
  • Enberg v. Bonde 331 N.W.2d 731 Minn. 1983
  • Enberg v. Bonde 331 N.W.2d 731 Minn. 1983
    In Price v. Sheppard, 307 Minn. 250 , the Director of the Minnesota Security Hospital had administered electroshock therapy to a patient against the express wishes of the patient’s guardian.
  • Finch v. Wemlinger 310 N.W.2d 66 Minn. 1981
  • Finch v. Wemlinger 310 N.W.2d 66 Minn. 1981
    Price v. Sheppard, 307 Minn. 250
  • County of Ramsey v. S. M. F. 298 N.W.2d 40 Minn. 1980
  • County of Ramsey v. S. M. F. 298 N.W.2d 40 Minn. 1980
    See Price v. Sheppard, 307 Minn. 250
  • State v. Vernon 283 N.W.2d 516 Minn. 1979
  • State v. Vernon 283 N.W.2d 516 Minn. 1979
    Price v. Sheppard, 307 Minn. 250 , Minnesota State Bd.
  • Minn. State Bd. of Health v. City of Brainerd 241 N.W.2d 624 Minn. 1976
  • Minn. State Bd. of Health v. City of Brainerd 241 N.W.2d 624 Minn. 1976
    See, Price v. Sheppard, 307 Minn. 250