Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Singsaas v. Diederich, 238 N.W.2d 878.

28 citing documents.

Bella Vista Condominium Association, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
10 actually damaged.” Singsaas v. Diederich
Thumper Pond Resort, LLC d/b/a Thumper Pond Resort, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
but caused by negligence occurring while the policy was in effect prior to cancellation, were not cove red by the policy.” (M inn.
Donnelly Bros. Construction Co. v. State Auto Property & Casualty Insurance Co. 759 N.W.2d 651 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Donnelly Bros. Construction Co. v. State Auto Property & Casualty Insurance Co. 759 N.W.2d 651 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
In this state, the actual-injury rule has evolved since it was first articulated in Singsaas v. Diederich, 307 Minn. 153, 156
Parr v. Gonzalez 669 N.W.2d 401 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Parr v. Gonzalez 669 N.W.2d 401 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
An occurrence takes place not when the policyholder engages in the wrongful act, “but the time the complaining party was actually damaged.” Singsaas v. Diederich, 307 Minn. 153, 156
In Re Silicone Implant Insurance Coverage Litigation 667 N.W.2d 405 Minn. 2003
In Re Silicone Implant Insurance Coverage Litigation 667 N.W.2d 405 Minn. 2003
Under such a rule, “the time of the occurrence is not the time the wrongful act was committed but the time the complaining party was actually damaged.” Singsaas v. Diederich, 307 Minn. 153, 156
In Re Silicone Implant Insurance Coverage Litigation 652 N.W.2d 46 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
In Re Silicone Implant Insurance Coverage Litigation 652 N.W.2d 46 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
An occurrence takes place not when the policyholder engages in the wrongful act, “but the time the complaining party was actually damaged.” Singsaas v. Diederick, 307 Minn. 153, 156 , -81 (1976).
Redeemer Covenant Church of Brooklyn Park v. Church Mutual Insurance Co. 567 N.W.2d 71 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Redeemer Covenant Church of Brooklyn Park v. Church Mutual Insurance Co. 567 N.W.2d 71 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
See also Singsaas v. Diederich, 307 Minn. 153 , (holding that occurrence covered is triggered when the injury occurs during the policy period, regardless of when the accident occurred, and denying coverage for injuries that occurred after the policy had expired).
Domtar, Inc. v. Niagara Fire Insurance Co. 563 N.W.2d 724 Minn. 1997
Domtar, Inc. v. Niagara Fire Insurance Co. 563 N.W.2d 724 Minn. 1997
Co., (denying coverage for employment discrimination damages incurred after the end of the policy period when a class action settlement formula assumed that the damages to each class member corresponded to the period of employment with Jos-tens; the policy limited coverage to personal injury taking place during the policy period); Singsaas v. Diederich, 307 Minn. 153, 155-56 , (denying coverage when the injury took place after the policy was cancelled by the insured; although the negligent act t
Jenoff, Inc. v. New Hampshire Insurance Co. 558 N.W.2d 260 Minn. 1997
Jenoff, Inc. v. New Hampshire Insurance Co. 558 N.W.2d 260 Minn. 1997
The district court granted New Hampshire’s motion for summary judgment, holding that Singsaas v. Diederich, 307 Minn. 153 , established a general rule that, under an “occurrence policy,” the time of the occurrence is not the time that the act resulting in liability is committed, but rather *262 the time that the complaining party is actually damaged.
Jenoff, Inc. v. New Hampshire Insurance Co. 545 N.W.2d 385 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Jenoff, Inc. v. New Hampshire Insurance Co. 545 N.W.2d 385 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
The district court also cited Singsaas v. Diederich, 307 Minn. 153
Northern States Power Co. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York 523 N.W.2d 657 Minn. 1994
Northern States Power Co. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York 523 N.W.2d 657 Minn. 1994
Cf. Singsaas v. Diederich, 307 Minn. 158, 155-56 , -81 (1976) (emphasizing that insurer agreed to be liable for damages incurred during the policy period.)
Fairview Hospital & Health Care Services v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. 518 N.W.2d 41 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Fairview Hospital & Health Care Services v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. 518 N.W.2d 41 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Under the actual injury rule, property damage occurs at “ ‘the time the complaining party was actually damaged.’ ” Industrial Steel, d at 159 (quoting Singsaas v. Diederich, 307 Minn. 153, 156 , ); see also Krawczewski v. Western Casualty and *44 Sur.
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. National Chiropractic Mutual Insurance Co. 496 N.W.2d 411 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. National Chiropractic Mutual Insurance Co. 496 N.W.2d 411 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Paul, relying on Singsaas v. Diede-rich, 307 Minn. 153 , contends its policy provides no coverage because Feldman’s ultimate injury did not occur during the St.
Jostens, Inc. v. CNA Insurance/Continental Casualty Co. 403 N.W.2d 625 Minn. 1987
Jostens, Inc. v. CNA Insurance/Continental Casualty Co. 403 N.W.2d 625 Minn. 1987
s of discrimination is “an act or series of acts * * * committed during this policy period which causes such personal injury.” Finally, the policies also define “Policy Period:” “This coverage applies to personal injury, * * * taking place during this policy period.” The provision defining the coverage period in the present case is similar to the provision we interpreted in Singsaas v. Diederick, 307 Minn. 153
Industrial Steel Container Co. Ex Rel. Rutman v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co. 399 N.W.2d 156 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Industrial Steel Container Co. Ex Rel. Rutman v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co. 399 N.W.2d 156 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Singsaas v. Diederich, 307 Minn. 153, 156 , the Minnesota Supreme Court interpreted a similar definition of occurrence of property damage to mean “not the time the wrongful act was committed but the time the complaining party was actually damaged.” We believe this interpretation governs the coverage in this case.