Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Spannaus v. Otolaryngology Clinic & Professional Associates, 242 N.W.2d 594.

37 citing documents.

opc7021302-040103.pdf Minn. Ct. App. 2023
opc7021302-040103.pdf Minn. Ct. App. 2023
See Spannaus v. Otolaryngology Clinic, 308 Minn. 334, 337
Troy David Mack, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Carnea Roberson, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
(describing res ipsa loquitur and stating that an injury “must be caused by an agency or instrumentality within the exclusive control of the defendant”).
DeWitt v. London Road Rental Center, Inc. 899 N.W.2d 883 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
DeWitt v. London Road Rental Center, Inc. 899 N.W.2d 883 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
(citing Spannaus v. Otolaryngology Clinic, 308 Minn. 334, 337 , ).
Lorenzo Sanchez, Sr. and Bertha Sanchez v. Tucson Orthopaedic Institute Levi Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
Stelter v. Chiquita Processed Foods, L.L.C. 658 N.W.2d 242 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Stelter v. Chiquita Processed Foods, L.L.C. 658 N.W.2d 242 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
See Spannaus v. Otolaryngology Clinic, 308 Minn. 334, 337
Blohm v. Johnson 523 N.W.2d 14 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Blohm v. Johnson 523 N.W.2d 14 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
(citing Spannaus v. Otolaryngology Clinic, 308 Minn. 334, 339 , ), pet.
Dang v. St. Paul Ramsey Medical Center, Inc. 490 N.W.2d 653 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Dang v. St. Paul Ramsey Medical Center, Inc. 490 N.W.2d 653 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
for rev. denied (Minn. July 31, 1987); Spannaus v. Otolaryngology Clinic, 308 Minn. 334, 339 , (joint enterprise theory might apply in medical malpractice case).
Leuer v. Johnson 450 N.W.2d 363 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Leuer v. Johnson 450 N.W.2d 363 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Spannaus v. Otolaryngology Clinic, 308 Minn. 334, 337
Peterson v. Fortier 406 N.W.2d 563 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Peterson v. Fortier 406 N.W.2d 563 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
When one participant in a joint enterprise negligently causes an injury while acting within the scope of such enterprise, every participant is liable to the injured party, Spannaus v. Otolaryngology Clinic, 308 Minn. 334, 339 , and the dissolution of a joint enter *566 prise does not extinguish tort liability for damages arising out of joint enterprise activities.
Werdin v. Fielden 406 N.W.2d 89 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Werdin v. Fielden 406 N.W.2d 89 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
*92 Spannaus v. Otolaryngology Clinic, 308 Minn. 334, 337
Seaton v. County of Scott 404 N.W.2d 396 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Seaton v. County of Scott 404 N.W.2d 396 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
See Spannaus v. Otolaryngology Clinic, 308 Minn. 334, 337 , see also Note, Exclusive Control Under Strict Liability and Res Ipsa Lo-quitur, 11 Wm.
Hoven v. Rice Memorial Hospital 396 N.W.2d 569 Minn. 1986
Hoven v. Rice Memorial Hospital 396 N.W.2d 569 Minn. 1986
Spannaus v. Otolaryngology Clinic, 308 Minn. 334, 337
Hoven v. Rice Memorial Hospital 386 N.W.2d 752 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Hoven v. Rice Memorial Hospital 386 N.W.2d 752 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Spannus v. Otolaryngology Clinic, 308 Minn. 334, 337
Hanzel v. Good Earth, Inc. 371 N.W.2d 72 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Hanzel v. Good Earth, Inc. 371 N.W.2d 72 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Spannaus v. Otolaryngology Clinic, 308 Minn. 334, 337
Mahowald v. Minnesota Gas Co. 344 N.W.2d 856 Minn. 1984
Mahowald v. Minnesota Gas Co. 344 N.W.2d 856 Minn. 1984
In addition, although the issue was not raised in appellants’ motion for a new trial, the trial court thought Spannaus v. Otolaryngology Clinic and Professional Associates, 308 Minn. 334 , prevented the application of the doctrine to a case in which there were multiple defendants.
Cornfeldt v. Tongen 295 N.W.2d 638 Minn. 1980
Cornfeldt v. Tongen 295 N.W.2d 638 Minn. 1980
See Spannaus v. Otolaryngology Clinic, 308 Minn. 334
Warrick v. Giron 290 N.W.2d 166 Minn. 1980
Warrick v. Giron 290 N.W.2d 166 Minn. 1980
Spannaus v. Otolaryngology Clinic, 308 Minn. 334, 337 , and cases cited therein.
Delgado v. Lohmar 289 N.W.2d 479 Minn. 1979
Delgado v. Lohmar 289 N.W.2d 479 Minn. 1979
Spannaus v. Otolaryngology Clinic, 308 Minn. 334
Weiby v. Wente 264 N.W.2d 624 Minn. 1978
Weiby v. Wente 264 N.W.2d 624 Minn. 1978
hree things with regard to the injury-producing event: (1) The event must be of a kind which ordinarily does not occur in the absence of someone’s negligence; (2) it must be caused by an agency or instrumentality within the exclusive control of the defendant; and (3) it must not have been due to any voluntary action or contribution on the part of the plaintiff.” Spannaus v. Otolaryngology Clinic, 308 Minn. 334, 337

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by