Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Peterson v. Peterson, 242 N.W.2d 103.

66 citing documents.

  • Faus v. Faus 319 N.W.2d 408 Minn. 1982
  • Faus v. Faus 319 N.W.2d 408 Minn. 1982
    In light of the broad discretion accorded the district court in making a division of property, Peterson v. Peterson, 308 Minn. 365, 368 , -96 (1976), we believe appellant’s challenge of the division of property in this case is without merit.
  • Melamed v. Melamed 286 N.W.2d 716 Minn. 1979
  • Melamed v. Melamed 286 N.W.2d 716 Minn. 1979
    Thus, the decision in Peterson v. Peterson, 308 Minn. 365 , which allows fault to be considered, is controlling here.
  • Aaron v. Aaron 281 N.W.2d 150 Minn. 1979
  • Aaron v. Aaron 281 N.W.2d 150 Minn. 1979
    See, , 609 & n. 5 (Minn. 1977); Peterson v. Peterson, 308 Minn. 365
  • Hansen v. Hansen 275 N.W.2d 52 Minn. 1979
  • Hansen v. Hansen 275 N.W.2d 52 Minn. 1979
    Peterson v. Peterson, 308 Minn. 365 , Bollenbach v. Bollenbach, 285 Minn. 418 , Minn.St.
  • LaPointe v. LaPointe 272 N.W.2d 259 Minn. 1978
  • LaPointe v. LaPointe 272 N.W.2d 259 Minn. 1978
    In Peterson v. Peterson, 308 Minn. 365 , we held that, upon a proper showing, evidence of marital misconduct should be admitted as one of the many factors to be considered by the trial court in the exercise of its broad discretion in the division of property and the award of alimony.
  • Elliott v. Elliott 274 N.W.2d 75 Minn. 1978
  • Elliott v. Elliott 274 N.W.2d 75 Minn. 1978
    6 Nevertheless, we believe that Peterson v. Peterson, 308 Minn. 365 , was correctly decided.
  • Bogen v. Bogen 261 N.W.2d 606 Minn. 1977
  • Bogen v. Bogen 261 N.W.2d 606 Minn. 1977
    Peterson v. Peterson, 308 Minn. 297
  • Harder v. Harder 251 N.W.2d 703 Minn. 1977
  • Harder v. Harder 251 N.W.2d 703 Minn. 1977
    We recently held in Peterson v. Peterson, 308 Minn. 365 , that the marital misconduct of the parties remains as one of several factors to be considered by the court in the exercise of its dis *303 cretion in the division of property and the award of alimony notwithstanding the fact that a dissolution of marriage may now be granted in this state wit