Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Milwaukee Mutual Insurance v. Currier, 245 N.W.2d 248.

34 citing documents.

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Angela Mary Lennartson, Katie Foss 872 N.W.2d 524 Minn. 2015
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Angela Mary Lennartson, Katie Foss 872 N.W.2d 524 Minn. 2015
In Milwaukee Mutual Insurance Co. v. Currier, 310 Minn. 81 , we concluded that a negligence verdict did not preclude subsequent, contractually required arbitration proceedings on a claim' for uninsured-motorist benefits.'' We explained that “[s]uch á result would run[ ] directly contrary to the plain terms of the parties’ agreement, namely, That the det
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, (A14-132), (A14-224) v. Angela Mary Lennartson, (A14-132), Katie Foss, (A14-224). 857 N.W.2d 713 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Followed State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, (A14-132), (A14-224) v. Angela Mary Lennartson, (A14-132), Katie Foss, (A14-224). 857 N.W.2d 713 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Co. v. Currier, 310 Minn. 81, 88, (“[A] res judicata defense does not preclude arbitration proceedings solely because the underlying claim would be barred by res judicata if asserted in an action in court.”).
Gerdesmeier v. Sutherland 690 N.W.2d 126 Minn. 2004
Distinguished Gerdesmeier v. Sutherland 690 N.W.2d 126 Minn. 2004
To support that position, Farmers cited Costello v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., and Milwaukee Mutual Insurance Co. v. Currier, 310 Minn. 81
Miklas v. Parrott 684 N.W.2d 458 Minn. 2004
Miklas v. Parrott 684 N.W.2d 458 Minn. 2004
Co. v. Currier, 310 Minn. 81, 86-87 , (noting that the term “legally entitled to recover damages” is ambiguous).
Reinhardt v. Milwaukee Mutual Insurance Co. 524 N.W.2d 531 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Reinhardt v. Milwaukee Mutual Insurance Co. 524 N.W.2d 531 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
v. Currier, 310 Minn. 81 , to argue that the Nordstrom dictum represented a “substantial departure” from the way UIM law had previously been practiced in Minnesota.
Employers Mutual Companies v. Nordstrom 487 N.W.2d 543 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Employers Mutual Companies v. Nordstrom 487 N.W.2d 543 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Co. v. Currier, 310 Minn. 81, 85
Costello v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. 472 N.W.2d 324 Minn. 1991
Costello v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. 472 N.W.2d 324 Minn. 1991
Co. v. Currier, 310 Minn. 81 , Liberty Mut.
Costello v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. 463 N.W.2d 911 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Costello v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. 463 N.W.2d 911 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Co. v. Currier, 310 Minn. 81, 87-88
Liberty Mut. Ins. v. AMERICAN FAMILY MUT. 463 N.W.2d 750 Minn. 1990
Liberty Mut. Ins. v. AMERICAN FAMILY MUT. 463 N.W.2d 750 Minn. 1990
Co. v. Currier, 310 Minn. 81, 87-88 , -52 (1976).
Aufderhar v. Data Dispatch, Inc. 452 N.W.2d 648 Minn. 1990
Aufderhar v. Data Dispatch, Inc. 452 N.W.2d 648 Minn. 1990
Co. v. Currier, 310 Minn. 81 , Nat’l Indent.
Aufderhar v. Data Dispatch, Inc. 437 N.W.2d 679 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Aufderhar v. Data Dispatch, Inc. 437 N.W.2d 679 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
In Milwaukee Mutual Insurance Co. v. Currier, 310 Minn. 81 , the issue was the preclusive effect of a jury verdict in a subsequent uninsured motorist coverage arbitration proceeding.
Arney v. American Family Insurance 429 N.W.2d 271 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Arney v. American Family Insurance 429 N.W.2d 271 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
See, e.g., Milwaukee Mutual Insurance Co. v. Currier, 310 Minn. 81, 88 , (claim for uninsured motorist coverage; arbitration proceedings were not precluded merely because the appellant’s liability was determined in a judicial proceeding and the underlying claim would have been barred by res judicata if the claim were asserted in an action in court).
Benson v. Johnson 392 N.W.2d 890 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Benson v. Johnson 392 N.W.2d 890 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
See Milwaukee Mutual Insurance Co. v. Currier, 310 Minn. 81, 88
Eckblad v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. 371 N.W.2d 78 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Eckblad v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. 371 N.W.2d 78 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In Milwaukee Mutual Insurance Co. v. Currier, 310 Minn. 81 , the supreme court held that court determinations had no effect on arbi-trations where the parties by their insurance contracts had agreed to the arbitrators deciding questions of fault and damages, not a jury.
National Indemnity Co. v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. 348 N.W.2d 748 Minn. 1984
National Indemnity Co. v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. 348 N.W.2d 748 Minn. 1984
Milwaukee Mutual Insurance Company v. Currier, 310 Minn. 81 , is controlling here.
Eric A. Carlstrom Construction Co. v. Independent School District No. 77 256 N.W.2d 479 Minn. 1977
Eric A. Carlstrom Construction Co. v. Independent School District No. 77 256 N.W.2d 479 Minn. 1977
In Re Arbitration Between Hennen & St. Paul Mercury Insurance 250 N.W.2d 840 Minn. 1977
In Re Arbitration Between Hennen & St. Paul Mercury Insurance 250 N.W.2d 840 Minn. 1977
Co. v. Currier, 310 Minn. 81 , for interpretation of a similar arbitration clause.