DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Malzac, 244 N.W.2d 258.

33 citing documents.

  • State v. Dahlin 695 N.W.2d 588 Minn. 2005
  • State v. Dahlin 695 N.W.2d 588 Minn. 2005
    309 Minn. 300, 306-08 , -63 (1976).
  • State v. Griffin 518 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1994
  • State v. Griffin 518 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1994
    836-37 (Minn.1983) (summarizing State v. Malzac, 309 Minn. 300 , ).
  • State v. Kobow 466 N.W.2d 747 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
  • State v. Kobow 466 N.W.2d 747 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
    State v. Malzac, 309 Minn. 300, 304 , (quoting Leinweber, 303 Minn. at 422, d at 126).
  • State v. Moore 458 N.W.2d 90 Minn. 1990
  • State v. Moore 458 N.W.2d 90 Minn. 1990
    and State v. Malzac, 309 Minn. 300, 306
  • State v. Mitjans 408 N.W.2d 824 Minn. 1987
  • State v. Mitjans 408 N.W.2d 824 Minn. 1987
    This case is similar to State v. Malzac, 309 Minn. 300 , one of the cases we discussed in Edwards .
  • State v. Edwards 343 N.W.2d 269 Minn. 1984
  • State v. Edwards 343 N.W.2d 269 Minn. 1984
    (ii) Murder cases in which we have considered the issue of submission of second-degree culpably-negligent manslaughter include, in chronological order, State v. Leinweber, 303 Minn. 414 , State v. Swanson, 307 Minn. 412 , State v. Malzac, 309 Minn. 300
  • State v. Richardson 332 N.W.2d 912 Minn. 1983
  • State v. Richardson 332 N.W.2d 912 Minn. 1983
    State v. Malzac, 309 Minn. 300
  • State v. Patch 329 N.W.2d 833 Minn. 1983
  • State v. Patch 329 N.W.2d 833 Minn. 1983
    Illustrating the approach we have taken is State v. Malzac, 309 Minn. 300 , in which we upheld the trial court’s refusal to submit a lesser offense when the defendant’s version of the events was contrary to all the physical evidence and undisputed expert testimony.
  • State v. Dodis 314 N.W.2d 233 Minn. 1982
  • State v. Gorham 306 N.W.2d 123 Minn. 1981
  • State v. Gorham 306 N.W.2d 123 Minn. 1981
    State v. Malzac, 309 Minn. 300 , State v. Leinweber, 303 Minn. 414
  • State v. Nelson 297 N.W.2d 285 Minn. 1980
  • State v. Nelson 297 N.W.2d 285 Minn. 1980
    Illustrative of this is State v. Malzac, 309 Minn. 300 , (upholding refusal to submit lesser offense where defendant’s version of what happened, which was the only evidence supporting submission of the lessor offense, was contrary to all the physical evidence and undisputed expert testimony).
  • State v. Stigen 295 N.W.2d 382 Minn. 1980
  • State v. Stigen 295 N.W.2d 382 Minn. 1980
    State v. McDonald, 312 Minn. 320 , State v. Malzac, 309 Minn. 300 , State v. Leinweber, 303 Minn. 414
  • Wolfe v. State 293 N.W.2d 41 Minn. 1980
  • Wolfe v. State 293 N.W.2d 41 Minn. 1980
    Compare State v. Swanson, 307 Minn. 412 , with State v. Malzac, 309 Minn. 300
  • LaMere v. State 278 N.W.2d 552 Minn. 1979
  • LaMere v. State 278 N.W.2d 552 Minn. 1979
    Recent cases illustrating the application of this test include: State v. McDonald, Minn., and State v. Malzac, 309 Minn. 300
  • State v. Swain 269 N.W.2d 707 Minn. 1978
  • State v. Swain 269 N.W.2d 707 Minn. 1978
    See, also, State v. Jordan, 272 Minn. 84 , and State v. Malzac, 309 Minn. 300
  • State v. Neumann 262 N.W.2d 426 Minn. 1978
  • State v. Neumann 262 N.W.2d 426 Minn. 1978
    See, State v. Malzac, Minn., State v. Annis, 308 Minn. 232 , State v. DeFoe, 308 Minn. 436 , State v. Kolodge, 293 Minn. 413 , State v. Carlson, 291 Minn. 536
  • State v. Nesgoda 261 N.W.2d 356 Minn. 1977
  • State v. Nesgoda 261 N.W.2d 356 Minn. 1977
    Recent cases illustrating the application of this test include State v. McDonald, Minn., and State v. Malzac, Minn.