Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Berg v. Berg, 244 N.W.2d 149.

28 citing documents.

Marriage of Warwick v. Warwick 438 N.W.2d 673 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Marriage of Warwick v. Warwick 438 N.W.2d 673 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
The Peterson analysis, originally limited to a custody context, was later expanded to “other matters before the family court.” Berg v. Berg, 309 Minn. 281, 285
Marriage of Hodges v. Hodges 415 N.W.2d 62 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Hodges v. Hodges 415 N.W.2d 62 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
ANALYSIS I. Standard of Review The standard of review of a referee’s see also Berg v. Berg, 309 Minn. 281, 285
Marriage of Jensen v. Jensen 414 N.W.2d 742 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Jensen v. Jensen 414 N.W.2d 742 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Peterson v. Peterson, 308 Minn. 297, 304 , (child custody matters); Berg v. Berg, 309 Minn. 281, 285 , (extending Peterson to family court matters other than custody).
Thomas v. Fey 405 N.W.2d 450 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Thomas v. Fey 405 N.W.2d 450 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
See Berg v. Berg, 309 Minn. 281, 284-85 , (Peterson reasoning in custody cases applies equally to other matters before the family court).
Marriage of Olson v. Olson 399 N.W.2d 660 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Olson v. Olson 399 N.W.2d 660 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Peterson was extended to family court matters other than custody in Berg v. Berg, 309 Minn. 281, 285
Marriage of Adams v. Adams 393 N.W.2d 508 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Adams v. Adams 393 N.W.2d 508 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
The supreme court did not address Berg v. Berg, 309 Minn. 281, 283 , which explained that Rule 60 merely prohibits relief from "that portion of a decree and judgment which actually dissolved the bonds of matrimony."
Fudenberg v. Molstad 390 N.W.2d 19 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Fudenberg v. Molstad 390 N.W.2d 19 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Berg v. Berg, 309 Minn. 281 , Pe *22 terson v. Peterson, 308 Minn. 297
Marriage of Thompson v. Thompson 385 N.W.2d 55 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Thompson v. Thompson 385 N.W.2d 55 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Peterson was extended to family court matters other than custody in Berg v. Berg, 309 Minn. 281
Marriage of Carlson v. Carlson 371 N.W.2d 591 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Carlson v. Carlson 371 N.W.2d 591 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Berg v. Berg, 309 Minn. 281, 283-284
Marriage of Schroetke v. Schroetke 365 N.W.2d 380 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Schroetke v. Schroetke 365 N.W.2d 380 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
However, Berg v. Berg, 309 Minn. 281 , explains: While the rule on its face does not allow relief from that portion of a decree and judgment which actually dissolved the bonds of matrimony, we have allowed a *383 party to attack the other portions of the judgment under such circumstances as amount to a fraud on the court and the adm
Marriage of Thomas v. Thomas 356 N.W.2d 76 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Marriage of Thomas v. Thomas 356 N.W.2d 76 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Berg v. Berg, 309 Minn. 281, 283-284
McCarthy v. McCarthy 344 N.W.2d 414 Minn. 1984
McCarthy v. McCarthy 344 N.W.2d 414 Minn. 1984
The district court was aware of our decisions in Peterson v. Peterson, 308 Minn. 297 , and Berg v. Berg, 309 Minn. 281 , but said, “Except for custody cases, this Court intends to follow Rule 53.05(2) and to apply the clearly erroneous test until and unless the Supreme Court directs otherwise.” We so direct.
Gilbert v. Christiansen 259 N.W.2d 896 Minn. 1977
Gilbert v. Christiansen 259 N.W.2d 896 Minn. 1977
One becomes the keeper of a dog only when he either with or without the owner’s permission undertakes to manage, control or care for it as dog owners in general are accustomed to do.” Minn., .
Sieber v. Sieber 258 N.W.2d 754 Minn. 1977
Sieber v. Sieber 258 N.W.2d 754 Minn. 1977
We later held in Berg v. Berg, Minn., that the reasoning in Peterson applies to all domestic matters incident to a divorce.