Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Continental Western Insurance v. Toal, 244 N.W.2d 121.

76 citing documents.

Clemens v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. 378 N.W.2d 68 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Clemens v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. 378 N.W.2d 68 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
See Continental Western Insurance Co. v. Toal, 309 Minn. 169, 177-78 , 126 (1976).
Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. v. Judith G. 379 N.W.2d 638 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. v. Judith G. 379 N.W.2d 638 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Continental Western Insurance Co. v. Toal, 309 Minn. 169, 177 , (emphasis in original), quoted in Hill, d at 835 .
Auto-Owners Insurance Co. v. Smith 376 N.W.2d 506 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Auto-Owners Insurance Co. v. Smith 376 N.W.2d 506 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Continental Western Insurance Co. v. Toal, 309 Minn. 169, 176
Farmers Insurance Group v. Hastings 358 N.W.2d 473 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Farmers Insurance Group v. Hastings 358 N.W.2d 473 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Continental Western Insurance Company v. Toal, 309 Minn. 169, 177 , (emphasis in original) (quoting Caspersen, 298 Minn. at 99 , d at 330 ).
Horace Mann Insurance Co. v. Independent School District No. 656 355 N.W.2d 413 Minn. 1984
Horace Mann Insurance Co. v. Independent School District No. 656 355 N.W.2d 413 Minn. 1984
Hill, d at 835 ; Continental Western Insurance Co. v. Toal, 309 Minn. 169
State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Williams 355 N.W.2d 421 Minn. 1984
State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Williams 355 N.W.2d 421 Minn. 1984
Co. v. Toal, 309 Minn. 169 , 174 n.l, , 124 n.l (1976); Iowa Kemper Ins.
Grain Dealers Mutual Insurance Co. v. Cady 318 N.W.2d 247 Minn. 1982
Grain Dealers Mutual Insurance Co. v. Cady 318 N.W.2d 247 Minn. 1982
Co. v. Toal, 309 Minn. 169
Fireman's Fund Insurance Co. v. Hill 314 N.W.2d 834 Minn. 1982
Fireman's Fund Insurance Co. v. Hill 314 N.W.2d 834 Minn. 1982
Co. v. Toal, 309 Minn. 169 , we stated: In Caspersen v. Webber, 298 Minn. 93, 99 , we indicated that an injury is “expected or intended” from the standpoint of the insured if a reason for an insured’s act is to inflict bodily injury or “when the character of the act is such that an intention to
Woida v. North Star Mutual Insurance Co. 306 N.W.2d 570 Minn. 1981
Woida v. North Star Mutual Insurance Co. 306 N.W.2d 570 Minn. 1981
We also held that intent to inflict injury could be inferred as a matter of law in Continental Western Insurance Co. v. Toal, 309 Minn. 169
Brown v. State Automobile & Casualty Underwriters 293 N.W.2d 822 Minn. 1980
Brown v. State Automobile & Casualty Underwriters 293 N.W.2d 822 Minn. 1980
Co. v. Toal, 309 Minn. 169
Iowa Kemper Insurance Co. v. Stone 269 N.W.2d 885 Minn. 1978
Iowa Kemper Insurance Co. v. Stone 269 N.W.2d 885 Minn. 1978
Co. v. Toal, 309 Minn. 169 , Hartford Fire Ins.
Ohio Casualty Insurance Co. v. Terrace Enterprises, Inc. 260 N.W.2d 450 Minn. 1977
Ohio Casualty Insurance Co. v. Terrace Enterprises, Inc. 260 N.W.2d 450 Minn. 1977
Co. v. Toal, Minn., note 5 (1976).
Farmers Insurance Exchange v. Sipple 255 N.W.2d 373 Minn. 1977
Farmers Insurance Exchange v. Sipple 255 N.W.2d 373 Minn. 1977
Co. v. Toal, Minn., (extensive discussion of “expected or intended” injury within meaning of policy exclusion).