Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Barber, 241 N.W.2d 476.

59 citing documents.

State v. Claussen 353 N.W.2d 688 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
The case of State v. Barber, 308 Minn. 204 , illustrates how only one observation may lead to the inference of criminal activity.
State v. Menard 341 N.W.2d 888 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Menard 341 N.W.2d 888 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
The case of State v. Barber, 308 Minn. 204 , illustrates how only one observation may lead to the inference that criminal activity might be occurring.
State v. Pleas 329 N.W.2d 329 Minn. 1983
State v. Pleas 329 N.W.2d 329 Minn. 1983
In State v. Barber, 308 Minn. 204 , we upheld a stop of a motor vehicle based on the officer’s suspicions about the reason that the license plates were wired on instead of bolted on.
Marben v. State, Department of Public Safety 294 N.W.2d 697 Minn. 1980
Marben v. State, Department of Public Safety 294 N.W.2d 697 Minn. 1980
See, State v. Barber, 308 Minn. 204
City of St. Paul v. Moody 244 N.W.2d 43 Minn. 1976
City of St. Paul v. Moody 244 N.W.2d 43 Minn. 1976
Rejecting his claim, we hold (1) that the police had a sufficient basis for the minimal intrusion occasioned by their knocking on the door of the car, State v. Barber, 308 Minn. 204 , (2) that the strong odor of paint fumes gave the police probable cause to believe that the occupants had been paint sniffing and justified their search for evidence of this offense, State v. Wicklund, 295 Minn. 402 , and (3) that the seizure of the gun, discovered in