DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Prideaux v. State Dept. of Public Safety, 247 N.W.2d 385.

115 citing documents.

  • State, Department of Public Safety v. Wiehle 287 N.W.2d 416 Minn. 1979
    In Prideaux v. State, Dept. of Public Safety, 310 Minn. 405 , we required that the police officer also inform the person of a right to a reasonable time within which to consult with counsel before taking or refusing to take the test.
  • Hepfel v. Bashaw 279 N.W.2d 342 Minn. 1979
  • Hepfel v. Bashaw 279 N.W.2d 342 Minn. 1979
    In Prideaux v. State, Dept. of Public Safety, 310 Minn. 405 , for example, we held that, in view of the important constitutional rights that could be involved, the “civil” label attached to driver’s license revocation was not dispositive, and we held that a person has a right to consult with a lawyer before deciding whether or not to submit to a blood-al
  • Heller v. Wolner 269 N.W.2d 31 Minn. 1978
  • Heller v. Wolner 269 N.W.2d 31 Minn. 1978
    In Prideaux v. State, Dept. of Public Safety, 310 Minn. 405 , we departed from an earlier case and held that a motorist should be informed he had the right to consult an attorney before deciding whether to consent to a test.
  • Goldsworthy v. State, Department of Public Safety 268 N.W.2d 46 Minn. 1978
  • Goldsworthy v. State, Department of Public Safety 268 N.W.2d 46 Minn. 1978
    Prideaux v. State, Dept. of Public Safety, 310 Minn. 405 , decided after petitioner’s arrest, held that a driver had a limited right to counsel for the purposes of the implied consent law.
  • State, Department of Public Safety v. Kneisl 251 N.W.2d 645 Minn. 1977
  • State, Department of Public Safety v. Kneisl 251 N.W.2d 645 Minn. 1977
    Recently, in Prideaux v. State, Dept. of Public Safety, 310 Minn. 405 , we recognized a limited right to counsel under § 481.10 when a person is arrested for allegedly violating § 169.121.
  • State, Department of Public Safety v. Held 246 N.W.2d 863 Minn. 1976
  • State, Department of Public Safety v. Held 246 N.W.2d 863 Minn. 1976
    Recently, in Prideaux v. State, Department of Public Safety, 310 Minn. 405 , we held that when police arrest a driver for allegedly violating Minn. St.
  • State, Department of Public Safety v. Early 247 N.W.2d 402 Minn. 1976
  • City of St. Louis Park v. Bunkers 247 N.W.2d 404 Minn. 1976
  • State, Department of Public Safety v. Early 247 N.W.2d 402 Minn. 1976
    As we held in Prideaux v. State, Department of Public Safety, 310 Minn. 405, 421 , , filed herewith: “* * * [A]ny person who is required to decide whether he will submit to a chemical test in accordance with § 169.123 shall, have the right to consult with a lawyer of his own choosing before making that decision, provided that such a consultation does not unreasonably del
  • City of St. Louis Park v. Bunkers 247 N.W.2d 404 Minn. 1976
    As we held in the case of Prideaux v. State, Department of Public Safety, 310 Minn. 405 , , filed herewith, when police arrest a driver for allegedly violating § 169.121, then under § 481.10 they must accede to any timely request by the driver for permission to telephone his lawyer before deciding whether to submit to chemical testing.