Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Hanson v. I. D. S. Properties Management Co., 242 N.W.2d 833.
- Wiley v. Robert Half International, Inc. 834 N.W.2d 567 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
-
Wiley v. Robert Half International, Inc.
834 N.W.2d 567
Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Co., 308 Minn. 422, 424-25 , (stating that “good cause attributable to the employer” need not be the employee’s only reason for quitting to qualify for that exception to ineligibility); Burtman v. Dealers Disc.
- Dachel v. Ortho Met, Inc. 528 N.W.2d 268 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
-
Dachel v. Ortho Met, Inc.
528 N.W.2d 268
Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Co., 308 Minn. 422, 425, n. 1 , , 835 n. 1 (Minn.1976) (citing Fannon v. Federal Cartridge Corp., 219 Minn. 306 , ) (negligence or wrongful conduct by the employer not necessary to support a claim of good cause to quit); Neubert v. St.
- Hanke v. Safari Hair Adventure 512 N.W.2d 614 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
-
Hanke v. Safari Hair Adventure
512 N.W.2d 614
Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Properties Management Co., 308 Minn. 422 , 425 n. 1, , 835 n. 1 (1976).
- Hawthorne v. Universal Studios, Inc. 432 N.W.2d 759 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
-
Hawthorne v. Universal Studios, Inc.
432 N.W.2d 759
Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Properties Management Co., 308 Minn. 422 , (all causal factors in a termination need not flow from the employer, but the termination must be wholly ‘without good cause attributable to the employer’.
- Wetterhahn v. Kimm Co. 430 N.W.2d 4 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
-
Wetterhahn v. Kimm Co.
430 N.W.2d 4
Minn. Ct. App. 1988
“Good cause attributable to the employer” does not require that the employer’s actions be negligent or wrongful, , 835 n. 1 (Minn.1976); Neubert v. St.
- Holbrook v. Minnesota Museum of Art 405 N.W.2d 537 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
-
Holbrook v. Minnesota Museum of Art
405 N.W.2d 537
Minn. Ct. App. 1987
for rev. denied, (Minn. June 12, 1984) (citing Hanson v. IDS Properties Management Company, 308 Minn. 422 , 425 n. 1, , 835 n. 1 (1976)).
- Burke v. Dorso Trailer Sales, Inc. 382 N.W.2d 570 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Dura Supreme v. Kienholz 381 N.W.2d 92 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
-
Dura Supreme v. Kienholz
381 N.W.2d 92
Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Properties Management Co., 308 Minn. 422 , which stated: The disqualification statute does not require that all causal factors in a termination flow from the employer, but that termination be wholly “without good cause attributable to the employer.” Id.
- Neubert v. St. Mary's Hospital & Nursing Center 365 N.W.2d 780 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
-
Neubert v. St. Mary's Hospital & Nursing Center
365 N.W.2d 780
Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Properties Management Co., 308 Minn. 422, 424-25 , -35 (1976) (employee quit for good cause when the employer failed to withhold a union initiation fee as promised); Porrazzo v. Nabisco, Inc., -64 (Minn.Ct.App.1985) (employee quit for good cause when employer substantially increased employee’s work hours and job duties w
- Burtman v. Dealers Discount Supply 347 N.W.2d 292 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
-
Burtman v. Dealers Discount Supply
347 N.W.2d 292
Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Properties Management Co., 308 Minn. 422 ,.
- Helmin v. Griswold Ribbon & Typewriter 345 N.W.2d 257 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
-
Helmin v. Griswold Ribbon & Typewriter
345 N.W.2d 257
Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Properties Management Co., 308 Minn. 422 , , 835 n. 1 (1976); Fannon v. Federal Cartridge Corp., 219 Minn. 306
- Jansen v. PEOPLES ELEC. CO., INC. 317 N.W.2d 879 Minn. 1982
- Loftis v. Legionville School Safety Patrol Training Center, Inc. 297 N.W.2d 237 Minn. 1980
-
Loftis v. Legionville School Safety Patrol Training Center, Inc.
297 N.W.2d 237
Minn. 1980
See also Hanson v. I. D. S. Properties Management Co., 308 Minn. 422, 425
- Stawikowski v. Collins Electric Construction Co. 289 N.W.2d 390 Minn. 1979
-
Stawikowski v. Collins Electric Construction Co.
289 N.W.2d 390
Minn. 1979
Properties Management Co., 308 Minn. 422
- Christensen v. Fiberite Corp. 269 N.W.2d 20 Minn. 1978
-
Christensen v. Fiberite Corp.
269 N.W.2d 20
Minn. 1978
389 (1945) — termination for sickness caused by the employment; Hanson v. IDS Properties Management Co., 308 Minn. 422 , — refusal of employer to withhold union initiation fee pursuant to authorization signed by the employee.